Agnes Viale
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Agnes Viale has a total of 169 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David B. Solit
Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
44 shared publications - Mark T. A. Donoghue
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
33 shared publications - Michael F. Berger
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
33 shared publications - Nicholas D. Socci
Bioinformatics Core, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
29 shared publications - Nikolaus Schultz
Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
25 shared publications - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
24 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 September 2026
- Published by Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities in Journal of Biomolecular Techniques
- Vol. 37 (3)
Shared Resource Management in the Cancer Center Environment: Beyond Operational Excellence
Shared Resource Management (SRM) is critical to demonstrating the scientific, operational, and strategic value of shared resources (SRs) within NCI-designated Cancer Centers, particularly during quinquennial Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) renewal. SRs provide advanced technologies, specialized expertise, and coordinated infrastructure that support basic, translational, and clinical research. Within this framework, SRM advances three core aims: sustaining state-of-the-art resources, centralizing operational and financial management, and fostering innovation to meet emerging scientific needs. This paper examines SRM through the following aims, highlighting its importance for CCSG preparation, institutional competitiveness, and adaptation to a changing NIH funding landscape. Despite evolving review expectations and funding uncertainty, effective SRM remains essential to cancer center resilience and research excellence.
- 10 September 2026
- Published by Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities in Journal of Biomolecular Techniques
- Vol. 37 (3)
Open AccessShared Resource Management in the Cancer Center Environment: Beyond Operational Excellence
Shared Resource Management (SRM) is critical to demonstrating the scientific, operational, and strategic value of shared resources (SRs) within NCI-designated Cancer Centers, particularly during quinquennial Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) renewal. SRs provide advanced technologies, specialized expertise, and coordinated infrastructure that support basic, translational, and clinical research. Within this framework, SRM advances three core aims: sustaining state-of-the-art resources, centralizing operational and financial management, and fostering innovation to meet emerging scientific needs. This paper examines SRM through the following aims, highlighting its importance for CCSG preparation, institutional competitiveness, and adaptation to a changing NIH funding landscape. Despite evolving review expectations and funding uncertainty, effective SRM remains essential to cancer center resilience and research excellence.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Genomically matched targeted therapies guided by MSK-IMPACT testing (n=22).
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Genomically matched targeted therapies guided by MSK-IMPACT testing (n=22).
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Clonality assessment of known oncogenic mutations in the female GCT cohort.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Clonality assessment of known oncogenic mutations in the female GCT cohort.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Patient demographic data for the female patients in the Extragonadal GCT cohort (both Make-an-IMPACT and internal MSK patients, n=16)
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Overcoming Barriers to Tumor Genomic Profiling through Direct-to-Patient Outreach
Patient demographic data for the female patients in the Extragonadal GCT cohort (both Make-an-IMPACT and internal MSK patients, n=16)
- Open Access
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 2 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Table 2 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 2 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Table 2 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- Open Access
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Table 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Table 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Table 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Table 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- Open Access
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Figure 4 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Figure 4 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Figure 4 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Figure 4 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- Open Access
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplemental Figure 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Figure 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
- 3 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplemental Figure 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Supplemental Figure 3 from Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer