Aaron Edelmann
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Aaron Edelmann has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexandra Neukum
WIVW GmbH Robert-Bosch-Straße 4 97209 Veitshöchheim Germany
1 shared publication - Barbara Metz
WIVW GmbH Robert-Bosch-Straße 4 97209 Veitshöchheim Germany
1 shared publication - Lena Rittger
Audi AG, 85045 Ingolstadt, Germany
1 shared publication - Markus Tomzig
Wuerzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences (WIVW) GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 4, 97209 Veitshöchheim, Germany
1 shared publication - Myriam Metzulat
Department of Psychology III Julius Maximilians University Würzburg Röntgenring 11 97070 Würzburg
1 shared publication - Stefan Stümper
Audi AG, 85045 Ingolstadt, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 3
The Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study
In automated driving, drivers may sleep during rides, making it important to study napping preferences and wake-up scenarios for human-centered system design. We conducted an online study with 280 participants, balanced by age and gender, examining how often, when, and how long individuals would nap if given the opportunity. The study also explored preferred wake-up methods when the vehicle nears the end of its operational design domain. Using a mixed 2 × 2 design, participants were assigned to one of two travel purposes (“commuting” vs. “holiday trip”) and two minimal risk conditions (rest area vs. hard shoulder). The results showed that 40% intended to sleep during automated driving, highlighting a strong interest in in-car sleeping. Wake-up preferences varied by travel purpose and minimal risk condition, with many favoring awakening before the drive ended. Participants also anticipated sleep inertia and desired post-wake-up support. The findings allow suggestions for designing wake-up concepts that mitigate sleep inertia.
- 14 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 3
Open AccessThe Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study
In automated driving, drivers may sleep during rides, making it important to study napping preferences and wake-up scenarios for human-centered system design. We conducted an online study with 280 participants, balanced by age and gender, examining how often, when, and how long individuals would nap if given the opportunity. The study also explored preferred wake-up methods when the vehicle nears the end of its operational design domain. Using a mixed 2 × 2 design, participants were assigned to one of two travel purposes (“commuting” vs. “holiday trip”) and two minimal risk conditions (rest area vs. hard shoulder). The results showed that 40% intended to sleep during automated driving, highlighting a strong interest in in-car sleeping. Wake-up preferences varied by travel purpose and minimal risk condition, with many favoring awakening before the drive ended. Participants also anticipated sleep inertia and desired post-wake-up support. The findings allow suggestions for designing wake-up concepts that mitigate sleep inertia.
- Open Access
Sick of being driven? -- Prevalence and modulating factors of carsickness in the European population in context of automated driving
As in automated driving the driver becomes a passenger, carsickness might reduce comfort for susceptible individuals. Insights in the prevalence of carsickness and its modulating factors are considered useful for the development of automated vehicles to mitigate or prevent its occurrence. An online survey was conducted with N = 3999 participants in Spain, Sweden, Poland, and Germany. 30% of participants reported to have already experienced carsickness as adult. The frequency of carsickness was modulated not only by demographic factors (country, gender, age), but also by frequency of being a passenger, type of non-driving related task, road type, and the seating position in car. Furthermore, the efficiency of applied countermeasures, temporal aspects of carsickness development, as well as the relation of carsickness with the acceptability of automated driving and the effect on subjective fitness to drive was investigated. The results are discussed with focus on automated driving.
Open AccessSick of being driven? -- Prevalence and modulating factors of carsickness in the European population in context of automated driving
As in automated driving the driver becomes a passenger, carsickness might reduce comfort for susceptible individuals. Insights in the prevalence of carsickness and its modulating factors are considered useful for the development of automated vehicles to mitigate or prevent its occurrence. An online survey was conducted with N = 3999 participants in Spain, Sweden, Poland, and Germany. 30% of participants reported to have already experienced carsickness as adult. The frequency of carsickness was modulated not only by demographic factors (country, gender, age), but also by frequency of being a passenger, type of non-driving related task, road type, and the seating position in car. Furthermore, the efficiency of applied countermeasures, temporal aspects of carsickness development, as well as the relation of carsickness with the acceptability of automated driving and the effect on subjective fitness to drive was investigated. The results are discussed with focus on automated driving.
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Ergonomics
- Vol. 92, 103346
Cross-cultural differences in the acceptance of decisions of automated vehicles
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Ergonomics
- Vol. 92, 103346
Cross-cultural differences in the acceptance of decisions of automated vehicles