Fabrizia Di Tana

The Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) is a distinct subspecies whose ongoing population recovery in Italy has progressively increased the demand for live capture protocols validated for scientific monitoring and conservation management. Despite the widespread use of mechanical and chemical immobilization in European wolf management, no study has to date systematically evaluated the combined use of the Fremont™ humane foot snare with a medetomidine-ketamine-acepromazine (MKA) protocol in this subspecies, nor characterized the associated cardiorespiratory, thermal, and hematobiochemical parameters under operational field conditions. Between June 2010 and July 2017, thirteen free-ranging Apennine wolves were captured in Maiella National Park (central Apennines, Italy) using the Fremont™ snare and immobilized with a standardized MKA protocol; only animals immobilized with this protocol are reported here, as three additional capture events employed different drug combinations. Cardiorespiratory parameters, body temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation, venous blood gas values, and a comprehensive hematological and serum biochemical panel were recorded during immobilization. Mean heart rate was 100 ± 15 bpm, respiratory rate 24 ± 13 breaths/min, body temperature 38.1 ± 1.3 °C, and mean SpO₂ 88 ± 11% (range: 66–97%; n = 12). No clinically significant hyperthermia requiring active intervention was recorded in the cohort as a whole. Hematological and biochemical values were broadly consistent with published reference ranges for the species, with condition-specific deviations identified in two individuals—one pregnant female and one juvenile presenting signs of transient capture-related myopathy—both of which resolved without clinical sequelae. No capture-related mortality occurred. All thirteen individuals survived the minimum post-capture monitoring period. Preliminary GPS observations in a subset of individuals (n = 3) suggest a transient reduction in movement activity in the immediate post-release period. These findings support the safety and operational feasibility of the combined Fremont™ snare–MKA protocol for the Apennine wolf, and provide baseline physiological and hematobiochemical reference data for Canis lupus italicus relevant to future capture and conservation management programmes.

The Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) is a distinct subspecies whose ongoing population recovery in Italy has progressively increased the demand for live capture protocols validated for scientific monitoring and conservation management. Despite the widespread use of mechanical and chemical immobilization in European wolf management, no study has to date systematically evaluated the integrated combina-tion of a humane mechanical restraint system and a structured chemical immobiliza-tion protocol — and specifically the association of the Fremont™ humane foot snare with a medetomidine-ketamine-acepromazine (MKA) protocol, in terms of their joint physiological effects and welfare implications for this subspecies under operational field conditions. Between June 2010 and July 2017, thirteen free-ranging Apennine wolves were captured in Maiella National Park (central Apennines, Italy) using the Fremont™ snare and immobilized with a standardized MKA protocol. Cardiorespira-tory parameters, body temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation, venous blood gas values, and a comprehensive hematological and serum biochemical panel were rec-orded during immobilization. Mean heart rate was 100 ± 15 bpm, respiratory rate 24 ± 13 breaths/min, and body temperature 38.1 ± 1.0°C. No clinically significant hyper-thermia was recorded in the cohort as a whole. Hematological and biochemical values were broadly consistent with published reference ranges for the species, with condi-tion-specific deviations identified in two individuals (one pregnant female and one ju-venile presenting signs of transient capture-related myopathy), both of which resolved without clinical sequelae. No capture-related mortality occurred. All thirteen individ-uals survived the minimum post-capture monitoring period, and preliminary GPS da-ta suggest a transient reduction in movement activity in the immediate post-release period. These findings support the welfare adequacy and operational feasibility of the combined Fremont™ snare–MKA protocol for the Apennine wolf, and provide base-line physiological and hematobiochemical reference data for Canis lupus italicus rele-vant to future capture and conservation management programmes.

The Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) increasingly inhabits human-modified land-scapes, where exposure to anthropogenic environments may influence pathogen cir-culation and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Despite this relevance, no shotgun met-agenomic data are available for this subspecies during rehabilitation. A juvenile male wolf admitted to a Wildlife Rehabilitation Center (WRC) after traumatic injury and treated with multiple antibiotics was sampled at admission (T0) and after 11 months of rehabilitation (T1). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq) was used to characterize fecal microbial communities, potential pathogens, and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) using Kraken2 and CARD-RGI. Bacterial diversity increased from T0 to T1. Microbial composition shifted from Enterobacterales-dominated pro-files to more diverse communities. Reads associated with animal and human patho-gens were detected at both time points, together with human-associated taxa and viral reads at T1. ARGs were abundant (444 at T0; 417 at T1), mainly involving efflux pumps and β-lactamases. Genes related to Highest Priority Critically Important Anti-microbials—including mcr variants, van clusters, and oxazolidinone resistance deter-minants—were identified. Shotgun metagenomics revealed marked microbiome changes and high ARG diversity in an Apennine wolf during rehabilitation. These findings highlight wolves as potential sentinels of environmental AMR and emphasize the importance of biosecurity measures in WRCs.

The Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) is a subspecies of gray wolf that is widespread throughout Italy. Due to hunting and habitat loss, their population declined dramatically in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but conservation efforts improved to restore the species to an estimated population of 3300 individuals. The presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in Apennine Wolf may pose a risk to its health and survival, as well as the health of other animals in its environment. In this study, we investigated the antibiotic resistance profiles of bacteria collected from Apennine wolves admitted to the Wildlife Research Center of Maiella National Park (Italy) in 2022. A total of 12 bacteria collected from four wolves were isolated and tested for susceptibility to antibiotics used in veterinary medicine and to critically important antibiotics for human health by means of the Vitek 2 system. All isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic, and six bacteria were multidrug resistant to critically important antibiotics (third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones). The results of this pilot study have allowed for the characterization of resistant profiles in Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and other bacterial species not previously reported in Apennine wolves. Our findings provide important insights into antibiotic resistance in wildlife and its potential implications for the conservation of biodiversity and public health.

The Apennine chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata) is one of the rarest subspecies in Italy, listed in Annexes II and IV of the Habitats Directive and currently included as a vulnerable subspecies in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. The Maiella National Park population has recently been defined as a source population for reintroduction into other parks. Since collective captures allow for better selection of target animals for the establishment of new colonies, the aim of this study is to evaluate the physiological conditions and animal welfare in free-ranging Apennine chamois after collective physical capture followed by chemical immobilization with medetomidine 0.054 mg ± 0.007, ketamine 2.14 mg ± 0.28, and acepromazine 0.043 mg ± 0.006. Twenty-one Apennine chamois (18 females and 3 males) were captured and translocated for conservation purposes. The effects of capture and anesthesia were evaluated using clinical variables, hematology, serum biochemistry, and venous blood gas analysis, the latter being used in the field for the first time in chamois capture. A risk of metabolic acidosis and capture myopathy was identified, although it did not compromise the survival of 19 chamois, which adapted to novel environments and founded new colonies, as verified through GPS radiocollars. The protocol applied in this study represents an innovative approach to assessing animal physiology and welfare in collective mountain ungulate captures, useful for improving management activities for conservation purposes.