Sean M. Rogers

Recently, with discriminatory legislation efforts and changing participation policies in organized sports, media attention surrounding transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals has increased. These changes and the historical lack of competence and education regarding the transgender patient population have resulted in subpar patient care and a misunderstanding of the athletic trainer’s (AT’s) role within the health care and compliance systems. This literature review is the second part of a 2-paper series, and our objective was to educate ATs on the processes relevant to medical affirmation, including compliance considerations regarding medical eligibility, and to establish the AT’s role. The gender affirmation framework includes social and legal components, which are discussed in part 1 of this literature, and the medical component is thoroughly discussed in part 2. All health care providers involved in the care of TGD individuals should work collaboratively on an interprofessional care team and have a general knowledge of the gender-affirmation process, including gender-affirming hormone therapy, surgical options, known risks and complications, and the general health needs of TGD patients. With this knowledge, ATs, as point-of-care providers and members of the interprofessional care team, are uniquely positioned to help reduce health and health care disparities. Furthermore, ATs can use their knowledge to facilitate medical compliance and eligibility in the evolving policies of sporting organizations.

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients experience discrimination, harassment, marginalization, and minority stress at greater rates than their cisgender counterparts, leading to numerous health and health care disparities that negatively affect well-being and access to quality health care.¹ Despite being in an opportune position to improve health equity for TGD patients under their care, many athletic trainers (ATs) report having little to no formal education on TGD patient care, leading to a reduction in self-reported competence. As such, to fill this knowledge gap, the purposes of the first part of this 2-part narrative literature review are to (1) provide readers with foundational information and terminology, (2) explore relevant health and health care disparities, and (3) identify the role of the AT within an interprofessional care team treating TGD patients.