Adithya Karthik Bhattiprolu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Adithya Karthik Bhattiprolu has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Rajkumar Boddu
Biopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad 500090, Telangana, India
6 shared publications - Sivacharan Kollipara
Biopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Hyderabad, India
6 shared publications - Tausif Ahmed
Biopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Bachupally, Hyderabad, India
6 shared publications Anand Arumugam
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), BachupallyMedchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, India
1 shared publicationAshima Bhatia
Biopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Hyderabad, India
1 shared publicationKarthik Parsa
Digital and Process Excellence, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Hyderabad, India
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 July 2024
- Published by Peertechz Publications Private Limited in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Developmental Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 022-09
Model Independent and Dependent Methods for Dissolution Profiles Comparison: Can we take the Road Less Travelled?
Dissolution testing plays an important role in pharmaceutical development due to its ability to provide critical insight into in vivo performance. Dissolution testing during routine pharmaceutical development can ensure batch-to-batch consistency and helps to ensure that the commercial batches are of representative quality to that of studied in the pivotal clinical studies. For comparing the dissolution profiles, there are multitude of approaches suggested by various regulatory agencies that consist of model independent and dependent approaches. The present review aims to summarize the current understanding of dissolution profile similarity approaches. Dissolution profile comparison approaches suggested by various regulatory agencies were compared and contrasted. Further, detailed procedural aspects were provided for the determination of similarity using model independent and dependent approaches. Model independent approaches such as f2 bootstrap, and Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) were portrayed from a practical perspective. Advanced tools such as Bias-Corrected and accelerated (BCa) for f2 bootstrap were discussed in depth. Further, model dependent approaches such as zero order, and Weibull models were discussed from realistic scenarios. Finally, the utility of modeling and simulation approaches such as physiologically based pharmacokinetics model (PBPK) and physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) were discussed in the context of their ability and potential to supersede traditional dissolution dissimilarity. Overall, this article acts as a ready-to-use guide for pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics scientists for effective methodologies for dissolution profile comparison for internal decision-making and regulatory justifications.
- 5 July 2024
- Published by Peertechz Publications Private Limited in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Developmental Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 022-09
Open AccessModel Independent and Dependent Methods for Dissolution Profiles Comparison: Can we take the Road Less Travelled?
Dissolution testing plays an important role in pharmaceutical development due to its ability to provide critical insight into in vivo performance. Dissolution testing during routine pharmaceutical development can ensure batch-to-batch consistency and helps to ensure that the commercial batches are of representative quality to that of studied in the pivotal clinical studies. For comparing the dissolution profiles, there are multitude of approaches suggested by various regulatory agencies that consist of model independent and dependent approaches. The present review aims to summarize the current understanding of dissolution profile similarity approaches. Dissolution profile comparison approaches suggested by various regulatory agencies were compared and contrasted. Further, detailed procedural aspects were provided for the determination of similarity using model independent and dependent approaches. Model independent approaches such as f2 bootstrap, and Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) were portrayed from a practical perspective. Advanced tools such as Bias-Corrected and accelerated (BCa) for f2 bootstrap were discussed in depth. Further, model dependent approaches such as zero order, and Weibull models were discussed from realistic scenarios. Finally, the utility of modeling and simulation approaches such as physiologically based pharmacokinetics model (PBPK) and physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) were discussed in the context of their ability and potential to supersede traditional dissolution dissimilarity. Overall, this article acts as a ready-to-use guide for pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics scientists for effective methodologies for dissolution profile comparison for internal decision-making and regulatory justifications.
- 20 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in AAPS PharmSciTech
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-19
Dissolution Profiles Comparison Using Conventional and Bias Corrected and Accelerated f2 Bootstrap Approaches with Different Software’s: Impact of Variability, Sample Size and Number of Bootstraps
Dissolution profiles comparison is an important element in order to support biowaivers, scale-up and post approval changes and site transfers. Highly varia
- 20 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in AAPS PharmSciTech
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-19
Dissolution Profiles Comparison Using Conventional and Bias Corrected and Accelerated f2 Bootstrap Approaches with Different Software’s: Impact of Variability, Sample Size and Number of Bootstraps
Dissolution profiles comparison is an important element in order to support biowaivers, scale-up and post approval changes and site transfers. Highly varia
- 27 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in The AAPS Journal
- Vol. 25 (5) , 1-18
Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment—Connecting Critical Bioavailability Attributes with In Vitro, In Vivo Properties and Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling to Enable Generic Regulatory Submissions
Quality risk assessment following ICH Q9 principles is an important activity to ensure optimal clinical efficacy and safety of a drug product. Typically, r
- 27 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in The AAPS Journal
- Vol. 25 (5) , 1-18
Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment—Connecting Critical Bioavailability Attributes with In Vitro, In Vivo Properties and Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling to Enable Generic Regulatory Submissions
Quality risk assessment following ICH Q9 principles is an important activity to ensure optimal clinical efficacy and safety of a drug product. Typically, r
- 9 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in AAPS PharmSciTech
- Vol. 24 (2) , 1-20
Best Practices for Integration of Dissolution Data into Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM): A Biopharmaceutics Modeling Scientist Perspective
Dissolution is considered as a critical input into physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) as it governs in vivo exposure. Despite ma
- 9 February 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in AAPS PharmSciTech
- Vol. 24 (2) , 1-20
Best Practices for Integration of Dissolution Data into Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM): A Biopharmaceutics Modeling Scientist Perspective
Dissolution is considered as a critical input into physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) as it governs in vivo exposure. Despite ma
- 9 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Vol. 111 (12) , 3397-3410
Utility of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Regulatory Perspective: Application to Supersede f2, Enabling Biowaivers & Creation of Dissolution Safe Space
- 9 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Vol. 111 (12) , 3397-3410
Utility of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Regulatory Perspective: Application to Supersede f2, Enabling Biowaivers & Creation of Dissolution Safe Space