Melanie Scarlett Mangold
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Melanie Scarlett Mangold has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carolin Steinack
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 shared publications - Daniel Franzen
Hospital of Uster
2 shared publications - Fabienne Rüber
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Fiorenza Gautschi
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Jasmin Wani
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Jürgen Hetzel
Department of Internal Medicine-Pneumology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 December 2024
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , e002617
Ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions: a multicenter pragmatic cohort study with real-world evidence
Background: Limited data exist on the reliability, efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy for suspicious mediastinal and hilar lesions. This study shares findings from implementing this method and compares the results with those of the standard endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Methods: Patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for mediastinal or hilar lesions in four Swiss centres were included. The study aims to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided cryobiopsy compared with EBUS-TBNA. Tunnelling to the target lesion was performed using an electric needle knife (70.8%), a 19 G- (12.4%) or a 22 G needle (16.8%). Cryobiopsies were obtained with a freezing time of 4–7 s (18.2% with a 1.7 mm probe) or 6–10 s (81.8% with a 1.1 mm probe). Results: Altogether, 137 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 89 days. The overall diagnostic yield was 56.2% for EBUS-TBNA and 91.2% for cryobiopsies (p<0.001). Cryobiopsies increased the diagnostic yield for benign disorders (+28.5%), uncommon tumours (+5.9%) and other metastatic cancer (+0.6%), but not for lung cancer (+0%). For lung cancer (n=27), immunohistochemistry was obtainable in 40.7% of EBUS-TBNA (median of 3 probes [IQR 3 to 3]), significantly lower than cryobiopsy’s 88.9% yield (median of 4 probes [IQR 3 to 5]) (p<0.001). Adverse events were found in 23.4% of participants; 10.2% had mild to moderate bleeding, 0.7% had pneumonia, and 0.7% (one) of patients had pneumothorax following pneumomediastinum. No deaths or mediastinum infections were observed. Conclusion: Cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions improves the diagnostic yield compared with EBUS-TBNA while maintaining a favourable safety profile.
- 12 December 2024
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , e002617
Open AccessUltrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions: a multicenter pragmatic cohort study with real-world evidence
Background: Limited data exist on the reliability, efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy for suspicious mediastinal and hilar lesions. This study shares findings from implementing this method and compares the results with those of the standard endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Methods: Patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for mediastinal or hilar lesions in four Swiss centres were included. The study aims to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided cryobiopsy compared with EBUS-TBNA. Tunnelling to the target lesion was performed using an electric needle knife (70.8%), a 19 G- (12.4%) or a 22 G needle (16.8%). Cryobiopsies were obtained with a freezing time of 4–7 s (18.2% with a 1.7 mm probe) or 6–10 s (81.8% with a 1.1 mm probe). Results: Altogether, 137 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 89 days. The overall diagnostic yield was 56.2% for EBUS-TBNA and 91.2% for cryobiopsies (p<0.001). Cryobiopsies increased the diagnostic yield for benign disorders (+28.5%), uncommon tumours (+5.9%) and other metastatic cancer (+0.6%), but not for lung cancer (+0%). For lung cancer (n=27), immunohistochemistry was obtainable in 40.7% of EBUS-TBNA (median of 3 probes [IQR 3 to 3]), significantly lower than cryobiopsy’s 88.9% yield (median of 4 probes [IQR 3 to 5]) (p<0.001). Adverse events were found in 23.4% of participants; 10.2% had mild to moderate bleeding, 0.7% had pneumonia, and 0.7% (one) of patients had pneumothorax following pneumomediastinum. No deaths or mediastinum infections were observed. Conclusion: Cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions improves the diagnostic yield compared with EBUS-TBNA while maintaining a favourable safety profile.
- Open Access
- 12 February 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (4) , 1474
Lung Ultrasound for the Exclusion of Pneumothorax after Interventional Bronchoscopies—A Retrospective Study
A chest X-ray (CXR) is recommended after bronchoscopies with an increased risk of pneumothorax (PTX). However, concerns regarding radiation exposure, expenses and staff requirements exist. A lung ultrasound (LUS) is a promising alternative for the detection of PTX, though data are scarce. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic yield of LUS compared to CXR, to exclude PTX after bronchoscopies with increased risk. This retrospective single-centre study included transbronchial forceps biopsies, transbronchial lung cryobiopsies and endobronchial valve treatments. Post-interventional PTX screening consisted of immediate LUS and CXR within two hours. In total, 271 patients were included. Early PTX incidence was 3.3%. Sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values of LUS were 67.7% (95% CI 29.93–92.51%), 99.2% (95% CI 97.27–99.91%), 75.0% (95% CI 41.16–92.79%) and 98.9% (95% CI 97.18–99.54%), respectively. PTX detection by LUS enabled the immediate placement of two pleural drains along with the bronchoscopy. With CXR, three false-positives and one false-negative were observed; the latter evolved into a tension-PTX. LUS correctly diagnosed these cases. Despite low sensitivity, LUS enables early diagnosis of PTX, thus preventing treatment delays. We recommend immediate LUS, in addition to LUS or CXR after two to four hours and monitoring for signs and symptoms. Prospective studies with higher sample sizes are needed.
- 12 February 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (4) , 1474
Open AccessLung Ultrasound for the Exclusion of Pneumothorax after Interventional Bronchoscopies—A Retrospective Study
A chest X-ray (CXR) is recommended after bronchoscopies with an increased risk of pneumothorax (PTX). However, concerns regarding radiation exposure, expenses and staff requirements exist. A lung ultrasound (LUS) is a promising alternative for the detection of PTX, though data are scarce. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic yield of LUS compared to CXR, to exclude PTX after bronchoscopies with increased risk. This retrospective single-centre study included transbronchial forceps biopsies, transbronchial lung cryobiopsies and endobronchial valve treatments. Post-interventional PTX screening consisted of immediate LUS and CXR within two hours. In total, 271 patients were included. Early PTX incidence was 3.3%. Sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values of LUS were 67.7% (95% CI 29.93–92.51%), 99.2% (95% CI 97.27–99.91%), 75.0% (95% CI 41.16–92.79%) and 98.9% (95% CI 97.18–99.54%), respectively. PTX detection by LUS enabled the immediate placement of two pleural drains along with the bronchoscopy. With CXR, three false-positives and one false-negative were observed; the latter evolved into a tension-PTX. LUS correctly diagnosed these cases. Despite low sensitivity, LUS enables early diagnosis of PTX, thus preventing treatment delays. We recommend immediate LUS, in addition to LUS or CXR after two to four hours and monitoring for signs and symptoms. Prospective studies with higher sample sizes are needed.