Seyedeh Elnaz Mirazimzadeh

This review explores the evolution and current state of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) applications in direct energy deposition (DED) and wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) processes. A Python-based automated search script was developed to systematically retrieve relevant literature using the Crossref API, yielding around 370 papers published between 2010 and July 2025. The study identifies significant growth in ML-related DED research starting in 2020, with increasing adoption of advanced techniques such as deep learning, fuzzy logic, and hybrid physics-informed models. A year-by-year trend analysis is presented, and a comprehensive categorization of the literature is provided to highlight dominant application areas, including process optimization, real-time monitoring, defect detection, and melt pool prediction. Key challenges, such as limited closed-loop control, lack of generalization across systems, and insufficient modeling of deposition-location effects, are discussed. Finally, future research directions are outlined, emphasizing the need for integrated thermo-mechanical models, uncertainty quantification, and adaptive control strategies. This review serves as a resource for researchers aiming to advance intelligent control and predictive modeling in DED-based additive manufacturing.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of toolpath patterns, geometry types, and layering effects on the mechanical properties of parts manufactured by direct energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing using data analysis and machine learning methods. A total of twelve case studies were conducted, involving four distinct geometries, each paired with three different toolpath patterns based on finite element method (FEM) simulations. These simulations focused on residual stresses, strains, and maximum principal stresses at various nodes. A comprehensive analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects (LME) model, principal component analysis (PCA), and self-organizing map (SOM) clustering. The LME model quantified the contributions of geometry, toolpath, and layer number to mechanical properties, while PCA identified key variables with high variance. SOM clustering was used to classify the data, revealing patterns related to stress and strain distributions across different geometries and toolpaths. In conclusion, LME, PCA, and SOM offer valuable insights into the final mechanical properties of DED-fabricated parts.