Onise Enukidze

Our understanding of foreland basin subsurface structures relies heavily on seismic reflection data. The seismic profile across the eastern Rioni foreland basin in western Georgia is critical for characterizing its deformation structural style. We applied fault-related folding and thrust wedge theories to interpret the seismic profile and construction structural cross-section, which reveals that compressional structures are controlled by multiple detachment levels. Both thin-skinned and thick-skinned structures are identified. The seismic profile and structural cross-section reveal the presence of normal faults, reverse faults, thrust faults, duplexes, triangle zone, and crustal-scale duplexes. The deep-level detachment within the basement is responsible for the development of the crustal-scale duplexes. These structures appear to have formed through the reactivation of pre-existing normal faults during compressive deformation. Based on our interpretation, the imaged duplex system likely represents the western subsurface continuation of the Dzirula Massif.

Our Understanding of the subsurface structure of foreland basins is based largely on seismic profiles. The seismic profile across the eastern Rioni foreland basin in western Georgia is crucial for identifying the deformation structural style. We used fault-related folding and thrust wedge theories to interpret these data. The seismic profile reflects that the dominant structural styles of the compressional structures are related to multiple detachments. We identified thin-skinned and basement-involved structures. The deep-level detachment in the basement develops the duplex. The formation of crustal-scale duplexes is related to the reactivation of pre-existing normal faults during compressive deformation. Based on the results obtained from the seismic profile, we assume that it represents the western continuation of the Dzirula massif.

The Rioni foreland basin system is located between the Lesser Caucasus (LC) and the Greater Caucasus (GC) orogens. Deformation of the Rioni double flexural foreland basin was controlled by the action of two opposing orogenic fronts, the LC retro-wedge to the south and the GC pro-wedge to the north (Alania et al., 2022). The Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt (RFFTB) is part of the Greater Caucasus pro-wedge. Here we show the deformation structural style of the RFFTB based on seismic reflection profiles and serial structural cross-sections. On the basis of serial structural cross-sections, 3-D structural models. 2-3D structural models show that the Rioni foreland is a thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt and the main style of deformation within the RFFTB is represented by a set of fault-propagation folds, duplexes, and triangle zones. The presence of two detachment levels in the RFFTB raises important questions about the deformation sequence. The serial structural cross-sections show that fault-propagation folds above the upper detachment level can develop by piggyback and break-back thrust sequences. The formation of fault-bend fold duplex structures above the lower detachment is related to piggyback thrust sequences. The synclines within the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt are filled by the Middle Miocene-Pleistocene shallow marine and continental syn-tectonic sediments, forming a series of typical thrust-top basins. The evolution of the thrust-top basins was mainly controlled by the kinematics of thrust sequences. Fault-propagation folds and duplex structures formed the main structure of the thrust-top basin. Recent earthquake data indicate that the RFFTB is still tectonically active and earthquake focal mechanisms within the RFFTB are thrust faults (Tsereteli et al., 2016), and active structures are mainly represented by thrust faults, blind thrusts, and blind wedges. Acknowledgments. This work was funded by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (SRNSF) (grant# FR-21-26377).ReferencesAlania, V., et al. (2022). Deformation structural style of the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt, western Greater Caucasus: Insight from the balanced cross-section. Frontiers in Earth Science 10, 10968386.Tsereteli, N., et al. (2016). Active tectonics of central-western Caucasus, Georgia. Tectonophysics 691, 328–344.

2D seismic reflection profiles revealed the presence of a triangle zone at the frontal part of the western Kura foreland fold-and-thrust belt of the pro-wedge of the Greater Caucasus. To understand the triangle zone geometry, seismic interpretations should be substantiated by forward kinematic modeling, supported by analog experiments. This study presents a new structural model for the region by integrating field observations, well data, and seismic reflection data. East-West directed along-strike structural variation of the frontal thrust is observed on the interpreted seismic profiles which affected the fold geometry. The Bitsmendi breakthrough fault-propagation fold gradually transits into a wedge structure in the W-E direction and is represented by the triangle zone. The seismic profiles interpretation results completely match with analog models of similar triangle zones. The analysis of the experimental results helps us to further understand the kinematic evolution of natural systems and improve seismic interpretation. The triangle zone developed in the western part of the Bitsmendi breakthrough fault-propagation fold is related to double fault-bend fold structural wedges and is characterized by the presence of passive, and active wedges, and passive-backthrust and passive-forethrust.

Collision and subsequent convergence of Arabia and Eurasian plates during the late Alpine time caused extensive intracontinental deformation in the Caucasus region. Inversion of back-arc basins, exhumation and crustal thickening took place in the far-field zone, forming two orogens, and leading to a convergence between the Lesser Caucasus (LC) and Greater Caucasus (GC). Continuous convergence between the LC and GC caused incremental deformation of the Rioni and Kura foreland basins. Recent GPS, earthquakes, and paleoseismic data indicate that the Kura foreland fold-and-thrust belt (KFFTB) is tectonically fairly active (e.g., Sokhadze et al., 2018; Tibaldi et al., 2020; Tsereteli et al., 2016; Stahl et al., 2022).In this study, we have integrated the post-stack depth-migrated 2D seismic profiles, borehole, and outcrop data to explore the structural geometry and kinematic features of the western KFFTB. Here we show the structural style of deformation of the convergence zone between the frontal part of the LC retro-wedge and the GC pro-wedge based on seismic reflection profiles. The seismic reflection profiles reveal the presence of a triangle zone and south-and north-vergent fault-related fold and south-vergent thrusts.In combination with surface geology and borehole data, we have analyzed along-strike variations of the south-vergent passive-back thrust and transition from the fault-propagation fold to wedge structure by using 2D seismic profiles in the western KFFTB.Based on the 2D seismic profiles and field data interpretations as well as our sequential kinematic modeling results, we have established the geometry and structural evolution of the LC-GC convergence zone in the western KFFTB since the Late Miocene.Acknowledgement: This research was supported by Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia (SRNSFG) [grant # YS-21-612. Geometry and kinematic evolution of frontal part of the Eastern Achara-Trialeti fold-and-thrust belt]

The Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt is part of the Greater Caucasus pro-wedge and is one of the most important examples of the collision-driven far-field deformation of the Arabia-Eurasia convergence zone. Here we show the deformation structural style of the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt based on seismic reflection profiles and regional balanced cross-section. The main style of deformation within the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt is represented by a set of fault-propagation folds, duplexes, and triangle zone. The regional balanced cross-section shows that fault-propagation folds above the upper detachment level can develop by piggyback and break-back thrust sequences. Formation of fault-bend fold duplex structures above the lower detachment is related to piggyback thrust sequences. A balanced section restoration of compressional structures across the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt provides a minimum estimate of shortening of −40%, equivalent −42.78 km. The synclines within the Rioni foreland fold-and-thrust belt are filled by the Middle Miocene-Pleistocene shallow marine and continental syn-tectonic sediments, forming a series of typical thrust-top basins. Fault-propagation folds and duplex structures formed the main structure of the thrust-top basin. The evolution of the thrust-top basins was mainly controlled by the kinematics of thrust sequences. Using end-member modes of thrust sequences, the thrust-top basins are divided into: 1) Type I-piggyback basin, 2) Type II-break-back basin, and 3) Type III—formation of thrust-top basin characterized by bi-vergent geometry and related to combined, piggyback and piggyback back thrust sequences.

Nine Mesozoic and Cenozoic palaeogeographic maps are presented to illustrate the petroleum prospectivity of the South Caucasus from a fresh perspective and as part of the wider Caucasus region. Previously, elements of petroleum systems – reservoir, source and sealing lithologies, and the timing of their formation – have mostly been examined within individual sub‐basins or licence blocks, and regional understanding has been limited. Emphasis is placed here on the onshore prospectivity of Georgia and Azerbaijan; the well‐known Pliocene Productive Series of eastern Azerbaijan and the southern Caspian is not considered.The Great Caucasus Basin (GCB) formed in the Early Jurassic following closure of PalaeoTethys, and remained a significant feature, despite structural modifications, until end‐Eocene underthrusting and uplift converted the basin into the Greater Caucasus mountains. By the Toarcian a major delta system had developed along its northeastern margin, while the Transcaucasus block to the south was mostly covered by a shallow sea with limited sediment supply. Bajocian volcanism across the South Caucasus was accompanied by modification of the structure of the Great Caucasus Basin with the intrusion of tholeiitic dykes, possibly associated with onset of northward NeoTethyan subduction. Rising sea levels led to the abandonment of the GCB delta system. Relative uplift of the South Caucasus in the Bathonian created lowlands surrounded by marginal settings in which paralic deposits and coals were laid down. Jurassic hydrocarbon source rocks include deep‐marine shales deposited within the Great Caucasus Basin together with coals; their potential is confirmed by numerous seeps within both Georgia and Azerbaijan. Various Middle Jurassic sandstones are potential reservoirs.Carbonates dominated by the late Callovian, with widespread development of Oxfordian reefs and of Late Jurassic evaporite basins in the North Caucasus. Bedded anhydrites in Georgia comprise potential seals. Shallow‐marine clastics again became widespread across the Caucasus in the Cretaceous, later replaced by carbonates including chalk‐like limestones. Deeper‐marine conditions persisted in the Great Caucasus Basin, which became less well‐defined and split into separate depocentres. Fractured chalks are known reservoirs in the North Caucasus and prospective reservoirs in the South Caucasus.Uplift of the southern South Caucasus during the Paleogene led to northward transport of sediment into evolving E‐W to ESE‐WSW basins in eastern Georgia and western Azerbaijan. Marine deposits within these basins form reservoirs, including thick fractured volcanogenic turbidites in eastern Georgia. Reduced sediment supply here at the start of the Late Eocene allowed organic‐rich restricted‐marine source rocks to accumulate.Rapid uplift of the GCB associated with underthrusting at the end of the Eocene led to emergence of the Greater Caucasus mountains. The prolific Maikopian source rocks were deposited in restricted‐marine conditions during the Oligocene and Early Miocene over the North Caucasus, parts of Azerbaijan and western Georgia, but they are diluted by coarser clastics in eastern Georgia where the Late Eocene source is more significant. Later Miocene uplift of the entire Caucasus region resulted in progressive marine regression, and the formation of potential reservoirs in alluvial and shallow‐marine sands.