Carmen Matey-Rodríguez

Carmen Matey-Rodríguez

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Carmen Matey-Rodríguez has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Collaborative Telehealth Intervention for Performance of Activities During Daily Routines by Children and Adolescents with Physical Disabilities: A Feasibility Study

    by Carmen Matey-Rodríguez, Mónica Pico, Verónica Robles-García, Lisa Musso-Daury, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Robert J. Palisano

    To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a collaborative telehealth intervention on engaging families in the intervention process, achievement of individualized goals, time spent practicing goal activities, and participant experiences. Twenty-one children/adolescents with physical disabilities (mean age 10.6 ± 4.1 years) and their parents collaborated with a physical therapist on an eight-week individualized intervention to achieve three goals for performance of activities during daily routines using WhatsApp. Mean ratings for Performance and Satisfaction with performance on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and mean Goal Attainment Scale T-scores increased between baseline, post-intervention, and 12-week follow-up (p < 0.001). Participants reported the intervention was more practical than usual care, they practiced their goals during the intervention, continued to practice in the 12 wk until follow-up, and the intervention empowered them to plan new personal goals in the future and ask for help when needed. An average of 9.2 ± 4.5 h was spent practicing the activities for the three goals. The collaborative process facilitated family engagement in the intervention and may have potential to build family capacity and children's self-determination. Further research is needed to determine whether the findings are replicable when the intervention is incorporated into students' education programs. Registered July 2024 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06514287).

  • Open Access

    Pain Neuroscience Education in Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

    by Mónica Pico, Carmen Matey-Rodríguez, Ana Domínguez-García, Noemí Yubero, Alejandro Santos-Lozano

    Background/Objectives: Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has demonstrated efficacy in adults with chronic pain, but the pediatric evidence is still developing, despite its increasingly frequent use. Evidence for the effectiveness of PNE in pediatrics remains fragmented across settings and outcomes, which justifies a systematic evaluation focused on children and adolescents. Methods: Following PRISMA, two reviewers independently screened records (PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro; through 21 July 2025), extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2 for randomized controlled trials; NIH/CASP for non-randomized studies). Given the heterogeneity, we conducted a structured narrative synthesis (SWiM) and rated the certainty of evidence with GRADE. PROSPERO: CRD420251062922. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. PNE consistently improved pain-related knowledge, with effects maintained at follow-up (moderate certainty); effects on pain intensity, function, and emotional outcomes were small and inconsistent (low certainty), with more favorable patterns when PNE was combined with exercise and/or booster sessions. Digital and gamified formats proved feasible and engaging; parental outcomes showed small improvements where measured. Conclusions: PNE is a promising, low-cost, and scalable component of pediatric chronic pain care, strengthening self-efficacy and adaptive coping. Integration into biopsychosocial, multidisciplinary programs—particularly alongside exercise and family involvement—may optimize outcomes. Larger, standardized trials with long-term follow-up and systematic adverse-event reporting are needed to solidify guidance for clinical practice.


  • Open Access

    From Inactivity to Activity: Passive Wheelchair Bike Rides Increase Trapezius Muscle Activity in Non-Ambulant Youth with Disabilities

    by Lisa Musso-Daury, Celia García-Chico, Susana López-Ortiz, Saúl Peñín-Grandes, Diego del Pozo-González, Rosa Ana Sánchez-García, Laura Marín-Varela, Carmen Matey-Rodríguez, Alejandro Santos-Lozano

    Background/Objectives: Children at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV and V experience severe motor impairments, yet the effects of passive wheelchair rides on their physiological parameters remain unexplored. This study aimed to examine the acute physiological response to passive bike in non-ambulant children with physical disabilities. Methods: This quasi-experimental study included 24 non-ambulant participants with cognitive impairments (6–21 years old, 50% female). After a 10-min rest, participants underwent a 10-min passive wheelchair bike. Muscle activity, oxygen consumption, and heart rate variability were assessed. Results: Passive bike rides significantly increased muscle activity in the right upper (p = 0.050), left upper (p = 0.008), and left lower trapezius (p = 0.038), with increases of 97–112%. However, no significant changes were observed in oxygen consumption or cardiorespiratory parameters. Conclusions: This study suggests that passive wheelchair bike rides increase trapezius muscle activity in children with severe disabilities at GMFCS levels IV and V, offering potential benefits for this population.

  • Open Access

    Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge about Pediatric Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

    by Mónica Pico, Carmen Matey-Rodríguez, Ana Domínguez-García, Héctor Menéndez, Simone Lista, Alejandro Santos-Lozano

    Pediatric chronic pain is a common public health problem with a high prevalence among children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to review the current knowledge of health professionals on pediatric chronic pain between 15–30% among children and adolescents. However, since this is an underdiagnosed condition, it is inadequately treated by health professionals. To this aim, a systematic review was carried out based on a search of the electronic literature databases (PubMed and Web of Science), resulting in 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The analysis of these articles seems to show a certain degree of heterogeneity in the surveyed professionals about the awareness of this concept, especially regarding its etiology, assessment, and management. In addition, the extent of knowledge of the health professionals seems to be insufficient regarding these aspects of pediatric chronic pain. Hence, the knowledge of the health professionals is unrelated to recent research that identifies central hyperexcitability as the primary factor affecting the onset, persistence, and management of pediatric chronic pain.


  • Open Access

    Validation and Determination of Physical Activity Intensity GT3X+ Cut-Points in Children and Adolescents with Physical Disabilities: Preliminary Results in a Cerebral Palsy Population

    by Carmen Matey-Rodríguez, Susana López-Ortiz, Saúl Peñín-Grandes, José Pinto-Fraga, Pedro L. Valenzuela, Mónica Pico, Carmen Fiuza-Luces, Simone Lista, Alejandro Lucia, Alejandro Santos-Lozano

    Background: Children and adolescents with disabilities engage in low levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), which may create the onset of a sedentary lifestyle. In light of this, MVPA levels must be quantified with a valid tool such as accelerometry. This study aimed to: (i) analyze the accuracy of Evenson cut-points by estimating MVPA and sedentary behavior (SB) in children and adolescents with disabilities; (ii) define new equations to estimate energy expenditure (EE) with the GT3X+ accelerometer in this population and particularly in those with cerebral palsy (CP); (iii) define specific GT3X+ cut-points to estimate MVPA in those with CP. Methods: A total of 23 children and adolescents with disabilities (10 ± 3 years; 44%females) participated in the study. GT3X+-counts and oxygen uptake (VO2) were measured in four laboratory walking conditions. Results: (i) Evenson cut-points were accurate; (ii) new equations were defined to effectively predict EE; (iii) specific GT3X+ cut-points (VM ≥ 702 counts·min−1; Y-Axis ≥ 360 counts·min−1) were defined for estimating MVPA levels in children and adolescents with CP. Conclusions: The use of specific cut-points for ActiGraph GT3X+ seems to be accurate to estimate MVPA levels in children and adolescents with disabilities and, particularly, in those with CP, at least in laboratory conditions.