Maria Karoline de Carvalho Rodrigues de Sousa
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Maria Karoline de Carvalho Rodrigues de Sousa has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Janerson José Coelho
Universidade Regional do Cariri Crato Ceará Brazil
3 shared publications - Joaquim Bezerra Costa
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Brazil
3 shared publications Luciano Cavalcante Muniz
Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil
3 shared publications- Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário
Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil
3 shared publications - Jose Carlos Batista Dubeux
University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center Marianna Florida USA
2 shared publications - Raabe Alves Souza
Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (UEMA) São Luís Brazil
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 24 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Agroforestry Systems
- Vol. 99 (1) , 1-20
Urea fertilization can reduce soil bacterial and archaeal diversity in agroforestry systems
- 24 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Agroforestry Systems
- Vol. 99 (1) , 1-20
Urea fertilization can reduce soil bacterial and archaeal diversity in agroforestry systems
- 17 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in Grass and Forage Science
- Vol. 79 (3) , 423-437
Urea fertilization for potentializing beef cattle performance in agroforestry systems in the humid tropics
This study hypothesized that urea fertilization could optimize animal performance in an agroforestry system. This study evaluated how increasing rates of N fertilization (0, 100, 200, and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1) using urea (CH4N2O) affected forage mass, nutritive value, and beef cattle (Bos indicus) performance in an agroforestry system with Massai grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Massai) and legume tree (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.), in the humid tropic region of Brazil, over 2‐year period. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with four treatments (N fertilizer rates) and three replications. Forage mass was positive and linearly affected by N fertilization (p = .0236, R2 = 0.92), ranging from 1297 to 1583 kg DM ha−1 under 0 and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1, respectively. There was greater average forage mass during the rainy period (1826 kg ha−1) (p < .05). Crude protein in green forage mass increased linearly (p = .0041, R2 = 0.91) in function of the N applied. Cattle average daily gain showed a positive quadratic response to the rates of N applied (p = .0298, R2 = 0.97), ranging from 0.46 kg to 0.68 kg animal day−1; and the gain per area increased linearly from 1.84 to 2.68 kg LW ha−1 day−1 (p = .0640, R2 = 0.96). The findings indicate that applying 200 kg N ha−1 year−1, split‐applied during the rainy season, would yield acceptable outcomes in terms of forage mass, nutritive value, and animal performance for this type of agroforestry system.
- 17 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in Grass and Forage Science
- Vol. 79 (3) , 423-437
Urea fertilization for potentializing beef cattle performance in agroforestry systems in the humid tropics
This study hypothesized that urea fertilization could optimize animal performance in an agroforestry system. This study evaluated how increasing rates of N fertilization (0, 100, 200, and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1) using urea (CH4N2O) affected forage mass, nutritive value, and beef cattle (Bos indicus) performance in an agroforestry system with Massai grass (Megathyrsus maximus Jacq. cv. Massai) and legume tree (Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.), in the humid tropic region of Brazil, over 2‐year period. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with four treatments (N fertilizer rates) and three replications. Forage mass was positive and linearly affected by N fertilization (p = .0236, R2 = 0.92), ranging from 1297 to 1583 kg DM ha−1 under 0 and 400 kg N ha−1 year−1, respectively. There was greater average forage mass during the rainy period (1826 kg ha−1) (p < .05). Crude protein in green forage mass increased linearly (p = .0041, R2 = 0.91) in function of the N applied. Cattle average daily gain showed a positive quadratic response to the rates of N applied (p = .0298, R2 = 0.97), ranging from 0.46 kg to 0.68 kg animal day−1; and the gain per area increased linearly from 1.84 to 2.68 kg LW ha−1 day−1 (p = .0640, R2 = 0.96). The findings indicate that applying 200 kg N ha−1 year−1, split‐applied during the rainy season, would yield acceptable outcomes in terms of forage mass, nutritive value, and animal performance for this type of agroforestry system.
- 7 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Agroforestry Systems
- Vol. 98 (4) , 995-1008
Nitrogen fertilization increased grass litter decomposition in a tropical agroforestry system
- 7 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Agroforestry Systems
- Vol. 98 (4) , 995-1008
Nitrogen fertilization increased grass litter decomposition in a tropical agroforestry system
- Open Access
- 30 March 2022
- Published by Revista Scientia Agraria Paranaensis (SAP) in Scientia Agraria Paranaensis
- p. 1-10
Soil alterations by chronosequence of pastures in crop-livestock-forestry systems
The intensive use of land has accelerated the loss of soil quality, a process that can be avoided by adopting conservationist production systems, such as the Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest (CLFI system). It is noteworthy that in the Southwest of the State of Maranhão a substantial portion of soils in rural properties are degraded and in distinct stages of erosion, since they have been exploited for decades with non-properly managed pastures. Therefore, the objective of this work was to emphasize the importance of physical and chemical changes in the soil of pastures under crop-livestock-forest integration in general and in the Amazon region of state of Maranhão, Brazil. Therefore, a literature review was conducted through a search for studies in the Google Scholar database, which encompasses multiple other databases, such as Scielo, Elsevier, Scopus, Capes, and others. In face of the conditions of degradation in pastures throughout the state of Maranhão and the broad distribution of native forests such as Babassu forests, the use of technology from CLFI systems could allow for their recovery and sustainable status by means of economically and ecologically feasible productivity. Research on this field is therefore necessary to highlight short- and long-term efficiencies regarding carbon sequestration and quality of organic matter on the soil.
- 30 March 2022
- Published by Revista Scientia Agraria Paranaensis (SAP) in Scientia Agraria Paranaensis
- p. 1-10
Open AccessSoil alterations by chronosequence of pastures in crop-livestock-forestry systems
The intensive use of land has accelerated the loss of soil quality, a process that can be avoided by adopting conservationist production systems, such as the Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest (CLFI system). It is noteworthy that in the Southwest of the State of Maranhão a substantial portion of soils in rural properties are degraded and in distinct stages of erosion, since they have been exploited for decades with non-properly managed pastures. Therefore, the objective of this work was to emphasize the importance of physical and chemical changes in the soil of pastures under crop-livestock-forest integration in general and in the Amazon region of state of Maranhão, Brazil. Therefore, a literature review was conducted through a search for studies in the Google Scholar database, which encompasses multiple other databases, such as Scielo, Elsevier, Scopus, Capes, and others. In face of the conditions of degradation in pastures throughout the state of Maranhão and the broad distribution of native forests such as Babassu forests, the use of technology from CLFI systems could allow for their recovery and sustainable status by means of economically and ecologically feasible productivity. Research on this field is therefore necessary to highlight short- and long-term efficiencies regarding carbon sequestration and quality of organic matter on the soil.