Moses Zakhele Sithole
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Moses Zakhele Sithole has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mishal Trevor Morepje
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
11 shared publications - Isaac Azikiwe Agholor
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
10 shared publications - Nomzamo Sharon Msweli
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
9 shared publications - Lethu Inneth Mgwenya
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
8 shared publications - Variety Nkateko Thabane
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
8 shared publications - Ndiko Ludidi
School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Vol. 10, 1745276
Effects of digital platforms on improved market access and reduced food losses for emerging farmers in South Africa
Introduction: Digital platforms are increasingly recognized as catalysts for agricultural transformation, offering tools that enhance coordination, market transparency, and post-harvest management. In South Africa, their potential is particularly relevant for emerging farmers who face structural challenges such as limited access to capital, infrastructure, and formal markets. Problem statement: Despite the availability of digital innovations, adoption remains uneven due to barriers including digital illiteracy, inadequate training, and poor rural connectivity. These challenges raise critical questions about the extent to which digital platforms practically improve market access and reduce food losses. Methodology: This review paper examines how digital technologies influence market access and food loss outcomes within the agricultural value chains. Results and discussion: Evidence suggests that digital platforms improve coordination between producers and buyers, enhance price discovery, and reduce inefficiencies in post-harvest handling. However, infrastructural and institutional constraints moderate these benefits. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of strengthening digital literacy programs for emerging farmers, the need for investment in rural broadband and mobile infrastructure and integrating digital platforms into formal market systems and agricultural extension services. Study implications: The review emphasize the need for supportive policy frameworks that promote platform interoperability, encourage public–private partnerships to scale inclusive agri-tech solutions, and address affordability and access barriers within smallholder farming communities.
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Vol. 10, 1745276
Open AccessEffects of digital platforms on improved market access and reduced food losses for emerging farmers in South Africa
Introduction: Digital platforms are increasingly recognized as catalysts for agricultural transformation, offering tools that enhance coordination, market transparency, and post-harvest management. In South Africa, their potential is particularly relevant for emerging farmers who face structural challenges such as limited access to capital, infrastructure, and formal markets. Problem statement: Despite the availability of digital innovations, adoption remains uneven due to barriers including digital illiteracy, inadequate training, and poor rural connectivity. These challenges raise critical questions about the extent to which digital platforms practically improve market access and reduce food losses. Methodology: This review paper examines how digital technologies influence market access and food loss outcomes within the agricultural value chains. Results and discussion: Evidence suggests that digital platforms improve coordination between producers and buyers, enhance price discovery, and reduce inefficiencies in post-harvest handling. However, infrastructural and institutional constraints moderate these benefits. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of strengthening digital literacy programs for emerging farmers, the need for investment in rural broadband and mobile infrastructure and integrating digital platforms into formal market systems and agricultural extension services. Study implications: The review emphasize the need for supportive policy frameworks that promote platform interoperability, encourage public–private partnerships to scale inclusive agri-tech solutions, and address affordability and access barriers within smallholder farming communities.
- Open Access
- 2 April 2026
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Sustainability
- Vol. 7, 1777618
The formal-informal institutional and policy nexus in livelihood diversification among smallholder farmers in developing countries: a systematic review
Livelihood diversification is widely recognized as a strategy for improving income stability, resilience, and food security among smallholder farmers in developing countries. However, evidence on how institutional environments shape diversification outcomes remains fragmented, particularly regarding interactions between formal and informal institutions. This study applies the Sustainable Livelihood Framework to examine how these institutional spheres influence livelihood diversification across developing-country contexts. A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and institutional reports from Africa, Asia, and Latin America was conducted. The review synthesized evidence on the roles of formal institutions, including extension services, financial systems, policies, cooperatives, and market infrastructure, alongside informal institutions such as kinship networks, reciprocity systems, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, community savings groups, and Self-Help Groups. Findings show that both institutional spheres significantly influence diversification decisions, with stronger outcomes where complementarities exist. Formal institutions shape access to markets, finance, technology, and information, while informal institutions provide social capital, flexibility, and risk-sharing mechanisms. However, weak coordination, policy misalignment, and exclusionary implementation processes often constrain diversification and produce uneven outcomes. The study concludes that sustainable livelihood diversification depends on cohesive institutional environments that recognize and integrate both systems. Key outcomes include improved income, food security, resilience, and capital accumulation. Recommendations include strengthening institutional coordination, improving extension and financial access, investing in rural infrastructure, aligning policies with local norms, and reinforcing governance within informal institutions to support inclusive livelihood diversification.
- 2 April 2026
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Sustainability
- Vol. 7, 1777618
Open AccessThe formal-informal institutional and policy nexus in livelihood diversification among smallholder farmers in developing countries: a systematic review
Livelihood diversification is widely recognized as a strategy for improving income stability, resilience, and food security among smallholder farmers in developing countries. However, evidence on how institutional environments shape diversification outcomes remains fragmented, particularly regarding interactions between formal and informal institutions. This study applies the Sustainable Livelihood Framework to examine how these institutional spheres influence livelihood diversification across developing-country contexts. A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and institutional reports from Africa, Asia, and Latin America was conducted. The review synthesized evidence on the roles of formal institutions, including extension services, financial systems, policies, cooperatives, and market infrastructure, alongside informal institutions such as kinship networks, reciprocity systems, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, community savings groups, and Self-Help Groups. Findings show that both institutional spheres significantly influence diversification decisions, with stronger outcomes where complementarities exist. Formal institutions shape access to markets, finance, technology, and information, while informal institutions provide social capital, flexibility, and risk-sharing mechanisms. However, weak coordination, policy misalignment, and exclusionary implementation processes often constrain diversification and produce uneven outcomes. The study concludes that sustainable livelihood diversification depends on cohesive institutional environments that recognize and integrate both systems. Key outcomes include improved income, food security, resilience, and capital accumulation. Recommendations include strengthening institutional coordination, improving extension and financial access, investing in rural infrastructure, aligning policies with local norms, and reinforcing governance within informal institutions to support inclusive livelihood diversification.
- Open Access
- 24 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 16 (7) , 719
Determinants of On-Farm Diversification Strategies: A Case Study of Smallholder Farmers in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa
Promoting resilience, increasing productivity and sustainability, and profit maximization remain key challenges facing farmers globally. These are exacerbated by factors such as climate change, low to no access to technological advancement, financial constraints, poor technical and management skills, inadequate government support, and limited access to resources. However, there are diverse strategies that abound, including on-farm diversification, that farmers could leverage on to address these numerous and complex challenges. This study investigated the determinants of on-farm diversification strategies among smallholders in Mpumalanga Province. The study employed a quantitative approach using closed-ended survey questionnaires to elicit information from a total of 465 farmers who were randomly sampled from a total population of 14,411. The data gathered were analysed using descriptive statistics to determine the on-farm diversification strategies employed by farmers and the factors influencing the use of these strategies. A binary logistic regression model was employed to establish the relationship between on-farm diversification strategies and the determining factors. More than half of the farmers were female (51.8%), with only 48.2% male. The majority (59.1%) of the farmers were between the ages of 36 and 60, with only 20.2% youth participation in farming. Slightly more than half (50.8%) of the farmers practise mixed farming as their on-farm diversification strategy, while only 4.3% of the farmers practise mono-cropping. The study identified significant variables such as level of education (p = 0.001), secondary source of income (p = 0.057), farmland size (p = 0.022), number of farm assistants (p = 0.016), and on-farm diversification awareness as key determinants of on-farm diversification among smallholder farmers in Mpumalanga Province. Therefore, it is recommended that policies within the agricultural sector be revised to encourage on-farm diversification in order to motivate farmers to transition to agripreneurship for poverty alleviation, food security and rural economic development (RED).
- 24 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 16 (7) , 719
Open AccessDeterminants of On-Farm Diversification Strategies: A Case Study of Smallholder Farmers in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa
Promoting resilience, increasing productivity and sustainability, and profit maximization remain key challenges facing farmers globally. These are exacerbated by factors such as climate change, low to no access to technological advancement, financial constraints, poor technical and management skills, inadequate government support, and limited access to resources. However, there are diverse strategies that abound, including on-farm diversification, that farmers could leverage on to address these numerous and complex challenges. This study investigated the determinants of on-farm diversification strategies among smallholders in Mpumalanga Province. The study employed a quantitative approach using closed-ended survey questionnaires to elicit information from a total of 465 farmers who were randomly sampled from a total population of 14,411. The data gathered were analysed using descriptive statistics to determine the on-farm diversification strategies employed by farmers and the factors influencing the use of these strategies. A binary logistic regression model was employed to establish the relationship between on-farm diversification strategies and the determining factors. More than half of the farmers were female (51.8%), with only 48.2% male. The majority (59.1%) of the farmers were between the ages of 36 and 60, with only 20.2% youth participation in farming. Slightly more than half (50.8%) of the farmers practise mixed farming as their on-farm diversification strategy, while only 4.3% of the farmers practise mono-cropping. The study identified significant variables such as level of education (p = 0.001), secondary source of income (p = 0.057), farmland size (p = 0.022), number of farm assistants (p = 0.016), and on-farm diversification awareness as key determinants of on-farm diversification among smallholder farmers in Mpumalanga Province. Therefore, it is recommended that policies within the agricultural sector be revised to encourage on-farm diversification in order to motivate farmers to transition to agripreneurship for poverty alleviation, food security and rural economic development (RED).
- Open Access
- 27 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (23) , 10627
Unpacking Water Scarcity Adaptation Strategies for Sustainable Food Production Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa
Building resilient and sustainable food production systems is a major challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) due to environmental, climatic, and economic pressures. Farmers in the region must adopt effective adaptation strategies to maintain productivity and contribute toward achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 2, “Zero Hunger.” Among these, water scarcity adaptation strategies are critical for building resilient food systems that also address poverty reduction. However, various obstacles hinder their widespread adoption, and documentation on these strategies remains fragmented. This paper examines available water scarcity adaptation strategies, the opportunities and challenges faced by farmers, and the policy and infrastructure implications for sustainable food production. The findings highlight the essential role of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in adopting these strategies. IKS supports natural resource conservation, promotes inclusive market participation, strengthens institutional frameworks, and improves resource-use efficiency under climate stress. The paper recommends further research on transferring Indigenous Knowledge to future generations and exploring the role of policy in preserving and promoting IKS, especially within the SSA context. Emphasizing Indigenous Knowledge is crucial for creating sustainable, resilient agricultural systems that can thrive amid the region’s growing environmental challenges.
- 27 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (23) , 10627
Open AccessUnpacking Water Scarcity Adaptation Strategies for Sustainable Food Production Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa
Building resilient and sustainable food production systems is a major challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) due to environmental, climatic, and economic pressures. Farmers in the region must adopt effective adaptation strategies to maintain productivity and contribute toward achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 2, “Zero Hunger.” Among these, water scarcity adaptation strategies are critical for building resilient food systems that also address poverty reduction. However, various obstacles hinder their widespread adoption, and documentation on these strategies remains fragmented. This paper examines available water scarcity adaptation strategies, the opportunities and challenges faced by farmers, and the policy and infrastructure implications for sustainable food production. The findings highlight the essential role of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in adopting these strategies. IKS supports natural resource conservation, promotes inclusive market participation, strengthens institutional frameworks, and improves resource-use efficiency under climate stress. The paper recommends further research on transferring Indigenous Knowledge to future generations and exploring the role of policy in preserving and promoting IKS, especially within the SSA context. Emphasizing Indigenous Knowledge is crucial for creating sustainable, resilient agricultural systems that can thrive amid the region’s growing environmental challenges.
- Open Access
Irrigation Water and Security in South African Smallholder Farming: Assessing Strategies for Revitalization
The precipitation pattern in South Africa is unpredictable and irregularly distributed across the nine provinces. Water resources support agriculture, mining activities, and other social and economic activities in the country. Nevertheless, South Africa is a water-scarce country prompting the urgent need for revitalization to increase water availability. There are major issues with irrigation water security in South Africa’s agriculture sector. Water scarcity, exacerbated by population growth, climate change, and wasteful use, threatens smallholder farmers’ livelihoods. Smallholder farmers encounter difficulties obtaining water despite initiatives to enhance water management, such as poor infrastructure, a lack of funding, and exclusion from choices about water management. This study examines the current water security challenges faced by smallholder farmers in ensuring water security in South Africa. It emphasizes the importance of collaborative networks, inclusive water governance, and innovative irrigation technologies. The study highlights the need for programs and policies that promote cutting-edge irrigation technologies and support smallholder farmers’ participation in water management decisions. Effective solutions require a coordinated approach, involving government, NGOs, and the private sector. Addressing these challenges can improve water security, promote sustainable agricultural development, and enhance food security nationwide effectively and efficiently. Additionally, the study suggests that context-specific solutions be developed, considering the requirements and difficulties smallholder farmers face. This entails funding irrigation infrastructure, assisting and training farmers, and advancing water-saving innovations.
Open AccessIrrigation Water and Security in South African Smallholder Farming: Assessing Strategies for Revitalization
The precipitation pattern in South Africa is unpredictable and irregularly distributed across the nine provinces. Water resources support agriculture, mining activities, and other social and economic activities in the country. Nevertheless, South Africa is a water-scarce country prompting the urgent need for revitalization to increase water availability. There are major issues with irrigation water security in South Africa’s agriculture sector. Water scarcity, exacerbated by population growth, climate change, and wasteful use, threatens smallholder farmers’ livelihoods. Smallholder farmers encounter difficulties obtaining water despite initiatives to enhance water management, such as poor infrastructure, a lack of funding, and exclusion from choices about water management. This study examines the current water security challenges faced by smallholder farmers in ensuring water security in South Africa. It emphasizes the importance of collaborative networks, inclusive water governance, and innovative irrigation technologies. The study highlights the need for programs and policies that promote cutting-edge irrigation technologies and support smallholder farmers’ participation in water management decisions. Effective solutions require a coordinated approach, involving government, NGOs, and the private sector. Addressing these challenges can improve water security, promote sustainable agricultural development, and enhance food security nationwide effectively and efficiently. Additionally, the study suggests that context-specific solutions be developed, considering the requirements and difficulties smallholder farmers face. This entails funding irrigation infrastructure, assisting and training farmers, and advancing water-saving innovations.
- Open Access
- 30 January 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (3) , 1149
Optimizing Water Conservation in South Africa’s Arid and Semi-Arid Regions Through the Cultivation of Indigenous Climate-Resilient Food Crops
The semi-arid and dry regions of South Africa experience shortages of water resources, which poses major challenges to livelihoods exacerbated by climate change. Despite the importance of indigenous food crops in optimizing water conservation, limited research has been conducted on effective strategies for promoting indigenous crops. This paper explores the potential of indigenous crops in optimizing water conservation in South Africa. This review paper adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist to ensure transparency, rigor, and reproducibility. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This review found that indigenous crops, such as sorghum and cowpeas, have innate traits that enable them to flourish in environments where water resources are limited. According to the findings of this study, these indigenous crops are resilient to drought and optimize water use efficiency. This review recommends the creation of a national database for indigenous climate-resilient food crops, which can act as an information hub for research and development. In maximizing the water use efficiency of indigenous crops, sustainable water management techniques remain critical. The results of this study have important implications for sustainable agriculture and water conservation in South Africa.
- 30 January 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (3) , 1149
Open AccessOptimizing Water Conservation in South Africa’s Arid and Semi-Arid Regions Through the Cultivation of Indigenous Climate-Resilient Food Crops
The semi-arid and dry regions of South Africa experience shortages of water resources, which poses major challenges to livelihoods exacerbated by climate change. Despite the importance of indigenous food crops in optimizing water conservation, limited research has been conducted on effective strategies for promoting indigenous crops. This paper explores the potential of indigenous crops in optimizing water conservation in South Africa. This review paper adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist to ensure transparency, rigor, and reproducibility. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. This review found that indigenous crops, such as sorghum and cowpeas, have innate traits that enable them to flourish in environments where water resources are limited. According to the findings of this study, these indigenous crops are resilient to drought and optimize water use efficiency. This review recommends the creation of a national database for indigenous climate-resilient food crops, which can act as an information hub for research and development. In maximizing the water use efficiency of indigenous crops, sustainable water management techniques remain critical. The results of this study have important implications for sustainable agriculture and water conservation in South Africa.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
Unpacking the Multifaceted Benefits of Indigenous Crops for Food Security: A Review of Nutritional, Economic and Environmental Impacts in Southern Africa
Indigenous and traditional food crops (ITFCs) are essential to initiatives aimed at increasing food and nutrition security and diversifying the food supply. Therefore, this study sought to evaluate the benefits associated with ITFCs, particularly for food security. The Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), Colocasia esculenta (Taro), and Sinapis arvensis (Wild mustard) are examples of indigenous crops that were introduced for food security in Southern Africa. This review assessed the advantages of indigenous crops for food security and examined literature, reports, and case studies from 2009 to 2024 using academic databases, like Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and AGRIS, to assess how indigenous crops impact on food security and the benefits thereof. The primary inclusion criteria were nutritional, economic and environmental impacts of these indigenous crops for food security in Southern Africa. The review concludes that maximizing these benefits requires removing obstacles through capacity-building and policy reforms. The need to integrate precision agriculture to increase production of indigenous crops should be considered and the coherent use of food crops associated with food security must be developed by the government. A comprehensive strategy centered on investment in sustainable farming and climate smart agriculture is recommended to ensure food security.
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessUnpacking the Multifaceted Benefits of Indigenous Crops for Food Security: A Review of Nutritional, Economic and Environmental Impacts in Southern Africa
Indigenous and traditional food crops (ITFCs) are essential to initiatives aimed at increasing food and nutrition security and diversifying the food supply. Therefore, this study sought to evaluate the benefits associated with ITFCs, particularly for food security. The Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), Colocasia esculenta (Taro), and Sinapis arvensis (Wild mustard) are examples of indigenous crops that were introduced for food security in Southern Africa. This review assessed the advantages of indigenous crops for food security and examined literature, reports, and case studies from 2009 to 2024 using academic databases, like Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and AGRIS, to assess how indigenous crops impact on food security and the benefits thereof. The primary inclusion criteria were nutritional, economic and environmental impacts of these indigenous crops for food security in Southern Africa. The review concludes that maximizing these benefits requires removing obstacles through capacity-building and policy reforms. The need to integrate precision agriculture to increase production of indigenous crops should be considered and the coherent use of food crops associated with food security must be developed by the government. A comprehensive strategy centered on investment in sustainable farming and climate smart agriculture is recommended to ensure food security.
- Open Access
Socio-Demographic Determinants of Climate-Smart Agriculture Adoption Among Smallholder Crop Producers in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga Province of South Africa
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is a transformative approach to farming that aims to meet the demands of increasing food production under the growing pressures of climate change. CSA’s goals are to boost agricultural productivity, enhance resilience to climate impacts, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, the study explored farmers’ socio-demographic factors influencing the adoption of CSA in sustainable crop production. The study was carried out in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga province of South Africa, with a focus on smallholder crop producers in the area. The study surveyed 300 smallholder farmers and employed simple random sampling, structured questionnaires, and a binary logistic regression model for data analysis. The significant and positive socio-demographic variables relevant to the adoption of climate-smart practices were level of education (p < 0.014), household size (p < 0.007), farm experience (p < 0.053), and farmland fertility (p < 0.047). Therefore, for CSA practices to be adopted by smallholder crop producers, a targeted approach is needed to address this issue. Therefore, support and training are needed to bridge the literacy gap among smallholder crop producers with the overall aim of improving their understanding of climate change and CSA practices that can mitigate the effects of climate change.
Open AccessSocio-Demographic Determinants of Climate-Smart Agriculture Adoption Among Smallholder Crop Producers in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga Province of South Africa
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is a transformative approach to farming that aims to meet the demands of increasing food production under the growing pressures of climate change. CSA’s goals are to boost agricultural productivity, enhance resilience to climate impacts, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, the study explored farmers’ socio-demographic factors influencing the adoption of CSA in sustainable crop production. The study was carried out in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga province of South Africa, with a focus on smallholder crop producers in the area. The study surveyed 300 smallholder farmers and employed simple random sampling, structured questionnaires, and a binary logistic regression model for data analysis. The significant and positive socio-demographic variables relevant to the adoption of climate-smart practices were level of education (p < 0.014), household size (p < 0.007), farm experience (p < 0.053), and farmland fertility (p < 0.047). Therefore, for CSA practices to be adopted by smallholder crop producers, a targeted approach is needed to address this issue. Therefore, support and training are needed to bridge the literacy gap among smallholder crop producers with the overall aim of improving their understanding of climate change and CSA practices that can mitigate the effects of climate change.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Unpacking the Multifaceted Benefits of Indigenous Crops for Food Security: A Review of Nutritional, Economic and Environmental Impacts in Southern Africa
Indigenous and traditional food crops (ITFCs) are essential to initiatives aimed at increasing food and nutrition security and diversifying the food supply. Therefore, the study sought to evaluate the benefits associated with ITFCs particularly on food security. The Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), Colocasia esculenta (Taro), and Sinapis arvensis (Wild mustard) are examples of indigenous crops that were introduced for food security in Southern Af-rica. This review assessed the advantages of indigenous crops for food security and examined lit-erature, reports, and case studies from 2009 to 2024 using academic databases like Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and AGRIS to assess how indigenous crops impact on food security and benefits thereof. The primary inclusion criteria were nutritional, economic and environmental impacts of the indigenous crops for food security in Southern Africa. The review concludes that maximizing these benefits requires removing obstacles through capacity-building and policy reforms. The need to integrate precision agriculture to increase production of indigenous crops should be considered and the coherent use of food crops associated with food security must be developed by government. A comprehensive strategy centered on investments in sustainable farming, climate smart agriculture is recommended to ensure food security.
- 25 November 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessUnpacking the Multifaceted Benefits of Indigenous Crops for Food Security: A Review of Nutritional, Economic and Environmental Impacts in Southern Africa
Indigenous and traditional food crops (ITFCs) are essential to initiatives aimed at increasing food and nutrition security and diversifying the food supply. Therefore, the study sought to evaluate the benefits associated with ITFCs particularly on food security. The Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), Colocasia esculenta (Taro), and Sinapis arvensis (Wild mustard) are examples of indigenous crops that were introduced for food security in Southern Af-rica. This review assessed the advantages of indigenous crops for food security and examined lit-erature, reports, and case studies from 2009 to 2024 using academic databases like Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and AGRIS to assess how indigenous crops impact on food security and benefits thereof. The primary inclusion criteria were nutritional, economic and environmental impacts of the indigenous crops for food security in Southern Africa. The review concludes that maximizing these benefits requires removing obstacles through capacity-building and policy reforms. The need to integrate precision agriculture to increase production of indigenous crops should be considered and the coherent use of food crops associated with food security must be developed by government. A comprehensive strategy centered on investments in sustainable farming, climate smart agriculture is recommended to ensure food security.
- Open Access
Examining the Barriers to Redesigning Smallholder Production Practices for Water-Use Efficiency in Numbi, Mbombela Local Municipality, South Africa
Smallholder farmers in South Africa face issues related to water shortages and poor irrigation water management. This study investigated barriers to improving water-use efficiency (WUE) in smallholder production practices in Numbi, South Africa. The objectives were to identify barriers in redesigning production practices for higher agricultural productivity and analyze the relationship between irrigation water supply and the adoption of WUE methods. From a population of 7696 people, 141 smallholder farmers were sampled using a simple random sampling technique through Taro Yamane’s sample size formula. The data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and descriptive statistics. Unreliable water supply (M = 3.78, SD = 0.85), poor soil water retention (M = 3.78, SD = 0.85), lack of water-efficient irrigation systems (M = 3.91, SD = 0.71), lack of water storage facilities (M = 3.85, SD = 0.93), limited access to credit (M = 4.09, SD = 0.85), income instability due to market fluctuations (M = 3.96, SD = 0.91), inadequate knowledge of irrigation management (M = 4.00, SD = 0.84), and harsh climatic factors were identified. A positive correlation (r = 0.339, n = 141, p < 0.001) between irrigation water source and WUE techniques was evident, indicating that irrigation water source had an insignificant impact on WUE methods. Resolving these barriers requires a holistic approach focusing on investments in irrigation infrastructure and targeted education initiatives by extension agents and other stakeholders, as this can enhance agricultural productivity.
Open AccessExamining the Barriers to Redesigning Smallholder Production Practices for Water-Use Efficiency in Numbi, Mbombela Local Municipality, South Africa
Smallholder farmers in South Africa face issues related to water shortages and poor irrigation water management. This study investigated barriers to improving water-use efficiency (WUE) in smallholder production practices in Numbi, South Africa. The objectives were to identify barriers in redesigning production practices for higher agricultural productivity and analyze the relationship between irrigation water supply and the adoption of WUE methods. From a population of 7696 people, 141 smallholder farmers were sampled using a simple random sampling technique through Taro Yamane’s sample size formula. The data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and descriptive statistics. Unreliable water supply (M = 3.78, SD = 0.85), poor soil water retention (M = 3.78, SD = 0.85), lack of water-efficient irrigation systems (M = 3.91, SD = 0.71), lack of water storage facilities (M = 3.85, SD = 0.93), limited access to credit (M = 4.09, SD = 0.85), income instability due to market fluctuations (M = 3.96, SD = 0.91), inadequate knowledge of irrigation management (M = 4.00, SD = 0.84), and harsh climatic factors were identified. A positive correlation (r = 0.339, n = 141, p < 0.001) between irrigation water source and WUE techniques was evident, indicating that irrigation water source had an insignificant impact on WUE methods. Resolving these barriers requires a holistic approach focusing on investments in irrigation infrastructure and targeted education initiatives by extension agents and other stakeholders, as this can enhance agricultural productivity.