Ruth E. Spierling

The egg industry continues to search for alternative feed ingredients that support production efficiency, enhance egg quality, and add nutritional value. Microalgae are rich in protein, pigments, and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, making them promising candidates for poultry diets. This study evaluated the effects of dietary inclusion (1 and 2%) of four microalgae species, Arthrospira platensis (Spirulina), Hydrodictyon sp., Uronema sp., and Vaucheria sp., on laying hen performance, egg quality, yolk fatty acid composition, and bone strength. Seventy-six Lohmann LSL-Lite hens (92 weeks of age) were randomly assigned to nine treatments (control diet or one of eight microalgae diets). Feed intake, egg production, egg mass, feed conversion ratio, eggshell traits, yolk color, yolk fatty acids, and tibial breaking strength were measured. Inclusion of microalgae did not negatively affect hen performance, egg quality, nor bone strength. Spirulina significantly improved egg production and egg mass (p < 0.05). Increasing levels of Spirulina, Hydrodictyon sp., and Uronema sp. enhanced yolk color (all p < 0.05), while Vaucheria sp. showed no effect (p > 0.05). Yolk fatty acid profiles were only modestly altered, with increased docosahexaenoic acid observed in hens fed Hydrodictyon and Uronema (p < 0.05). In conclusion, low-level dietary inclusion of these microalgae species appears safe for laying hens and may provide added value through improved yolk pigmentation and modest omega-3 enrichment.

Our study objective was to determine the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility (AIAAD) of spirulina fed to broiler chickens and laying hens using the difference method. In both experiments, birds were either fed corn-soybean meal basal diets, containing no spirulina and formulated to provide the nutrient requirements of either broilers or layers, or fed test diets consisting of 25% spirulina and 75% of the appropriate basal diet. Titanium dioxide was added to all diets as an indigestible marker. The diets were fed to 10 replicate cages/treatment of broilers and 15 replicate cages/treatment of laying hens. The AME of spirulina for broilers was significantly lower (p < 0.05) (2368 ± 104 kcal/kg, as fed) than for laying hens (3144 ± 173 kcal/kg, as fed), suggesting bird type and age may influence energy utilization. The AIAAD of spirulina fed to broiler chickens did not differ from that of laying hens (p > 0.05), except for valine, alanine, and glycine, which were all significantly higher in laying hens (p < 0.05). Overall, the AIAAD for nonessential amino acids averaged 81.1%, with no significant difference between essential and nonessential amino acids. Differences in spirulina nutrient content cited in the literature support further research to determine the optimal inclusion of this alternative ingredient in broiler and layer diets.

Olive cake, the solid byproduct of three-phase centrifugation olive oil production, has a high organic and polyphenol content, rendering it an environmental threat when landfilled as well as limiting its animal feed potential. This residue can be a good candidate for biomethane production due to its rich polysaccharide content (pectin, hemicellulose, and cellulose). Two strategies were compared to maximize biomethane production: destoning (i.e., removal of the seed fragments via mechanical means) and enzymatic pretreatment of the pulp. After 30 days of batch anaerobic digestion at 35 °C, both enzymatically pretreated and destoned olive cakes produced similar amounts of methane (~295 mL CH₄/g volatile solids (VS)), 42% more than the control. A comparison of olive cake’s biomethane yields with a broad range of agricultural residues in the literature demonstrated its suitability for biomethane production. Additionally, the digestate recovered from the anaerobic digestion of olive cake had high Kjeldahl nitrogen contents (3.6%, db) and low polyphenol concentrations (0.02 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g), qualifying it as an ingredient for soil amendment. This study demonstrated olive cake can be diverted from landfills for second-generation biofuel production, and that the resulting digestate may have value for soil amendment.