Dean Edward Watkins
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Dean Edward Watkins has a total of 30 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ahmad Hegazi
Department of Cell and Cancer Biology, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
2 shared publications - Alexander J. Didier
The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, USA
2 shared publications - John Nemunaitis
Gradalis, Inc, Dallas, USA
2 shared publications - Adam Walter
Gradalis, Inc., Dallas, TX 75006, USA
1 shared publication - Alan M. Fahoury
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
1 shared publication - Andrew R. Campbell
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Medical Reports
- Vol. 13
Menorrhagia as an initial presentation of metastatic malignant melanoma: Case report
- 13 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Medical Reports
- Vol. 13
Open AccessMenorrhagia as an initial presentation of metastatic malignant melanoma: Case report
- Open Access
- 28 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 25 (21) , 11560
Advancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with a consistently low five-year survival rate for the past several decades. This is in stark contrast to other cancers, which have seen significant improvement in survival and prognosis due to recent developments in therapeutic modalities. These modest improvements in pancreatic cancer outcomes have primarily resulted from minor advances in cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, with limited progress in other treatment approaches. A major focus of current therapeutic research is the further development of immunomodulatory therapies characterized by antibody-based approaches, cellular therapies, and vaccines. Although initial results utilizing immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer have been mixed, recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes. In this review, we detail these three approaches to immunomodulation, highlighting their common targets and distinct shortcomings, and we provide a narrative summary of completed and ongoing clinical trials that utilize these approaches to immunomodulation. Within this context, we aim to inform future research efforts by identifying promising areas that warrant further exploration.
- 28 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 25 (21) , 11560
Open AccessAdvancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with a consistently low five-year survival rate for the past several decades. This is in stark contrast to other cancers, which have seen significant improvement in survival and prognosis due to recent developments in therapeutic modalities. These modest improvements in pancreatic cancer outcomes have primarily resulted from minor advances in cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, with limited progress in other treatment approaches. A major focus of current therapeutic research is the further development of immunomodulatory therapies characterized by antibody-based approaches, cellular therapies, and vaccines. Although initial results utilizing immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer have been mixed, recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes. In this review, we detail these three approaches to immunomodulation, highlighting their common targets and distinct shortcomings, and we provide a narrative summary of completed and ongoing clinical trials that utilize these approaches to immunomodulation. Within this context, we aim to inform future research efforts by identifying promising areas that warrant further exploration.
- Open Access
The Effects of Radiotherapy on the Sequence and Eligibility of Breast Reconstruction: Current Evidence and Controversy
Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following a mastectomy, combined with radiotherapy, presents a multifaceted approach to breast cancer treatment, balancing oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes. IBR, typically involving the use of implants or autologous tissue, aims to restore breast morphology directly after a mastectomy, minimizing the psychological and physical impacts. However, integrating radiotherapy with IBR is complex due to the potential adverse effects on reconstructed tissues. Radiotherapy, essential for reducing local recurrence, can induce fibrosis, capsular contracture, and compromised aesthetic results. This narrative review covers the current trends in the sequencing of breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. We discuss patient selection, timing of radiotherapy, and reconstructive techniques, with special attention paid to quality-of-life outcomes that are increasingly reported in clinical trials. Emerging evidence supports the feasibility of IBR with careful patient selection and tailored therapeutic approaches, although ongoing research is necessary to refine protocols and enhance outcomes. Overall, IBR in the context of radiotherapy remains a promising but intricate treatment modality, requiring a nuanced balance between cancer control and aesthetic restoration.
Open AccessThe Effects of Radiotherapy on the Sequence and Eligibility of Breast Reconstruction: Current Evidence and Controversy
Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following a mastectomy, combined with radiotherapy, presents a multifaceted approach to breast cancer treatment, balancing oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes. IBR, typically involving the use of implants or autologous tissue, aims to restore breast morphology directly after a mastectomy, minimizing the psychological and physical impacts. However, integrating radiotherapy with IBR is complex due to the potential adverse effects on reconstructed tissues. Radiotherapy, essential for reducing local recurrence, can induce fibrosis, capsular contracture, and compromised aesthetic results. This narrative review covers the current trends in the sequencing of breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. We discuss patient selection, timing of radiotherapy, and reconstructive techniques, with special attention paid to quality-of-life outcomes that are increasingly reported in clinical trials. Emerging evidence supports the feasibility of IBR with careful patient selection and tailored therapeutic approaches, although ongoing research is necessary to refine protocols and enhance outcomes. Overall, IBR in the context of radiotherapy remains a promising but intricate treatment modality, requiring a nuanced balance between cancer control and aesthetic restoration.
- Open Access
- 23 April 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Future Oncology
- Vol. 20 (19) , 1367-1380
Regulatory role of CD39 and CD73 in tumor immunity
CD39 is the rate-limiting enzyme for the molecular signal cascade leading to the generation of ADP and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). In conjunction with CD73, CD39 converts adenosine triphosphate ...
- 23 April 2024
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Future Oncology
- Vol. 20 (19) , 1367-1380
Open AccessRegulatory role of CD39 and CD73 in tumor immunity
CD39 is the rate-limiting enzyme for the molecular signal cascade leading to the generation of ADP and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). In conjunction with CD73, CD39 converts adenosine triphosphate ...
- Open Access
- 15 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (18) , 5992
Advances in Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Cervical cancer is an international public health crisis, affecting several hundred thousand women annually. While not universally protective due to other risk factors, many such cases are preventable with vaccination against high-risk serotypes of the human papilloma virus (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 53, 58). Advanced-stage and recurrent cervical cancers are typically lethal and have been the focus in recent years of the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to improve survival. We have consolidated information regarding the role of the immune system in both disease progression and disease clearance with the aid of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents. Additionally, we have characterized the treatment modalities currently indicated as the standard of care—such as bevacizumab and the immune CPIs—and those recently approved or in development, including Tivdak, Vigil, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells.
- 15 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (18) , 5992
Open AccessAdvances in Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Cervical cancer is an international public health crisis, affecting several hundred thousand women annually. While not universally protective due to other risk factors, many such cases are preventable with vaccination against high-risk serotypes of the human papilloma virus (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 53, 58). Advanced-stage and recurrent cervical cancers are typically lethal and have been the focus in recent years of the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to improve survival. We have consolidated information regarding the role of the immune system in both disease progression and disease clearance with the aid of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents. Additionally, we have characterized the treatment modalities currently indicated as the standard of care—such as bevacizumab and the immune CPIs—and those recently approved or in development, including Tivdak, Vigil, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 3 March 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Antioxidants
- Vol. 12 (3) , 632
Antioxidant and Anti-Tumor Effects of Dietary Vitamins A, C, and E
Oxidative stress, a condition characterized by an imbalance between pro-oxidant molecules and antioxidant defense systems, is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to cancer development. This is because the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during oxidative stress can damage DNA, proteins, and lipids to facilitate mutations and other cellular changes that promote cancer growth. Antioxidant supplementation is a potential strategy for decreasing cancer incidence; by reducing oxidative stress, DNA damage and other deleterious cellular changes may be attenuated. Several clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the role of antioxidant supplements in cancer prevention. Some studies have found that antioxidant supplements, such as vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin E, can reduce the risk of certain types of cancer. On the other hand, some studies posit an increased risk of cancer with antioxidant supplement use. In this review, we will provide an overview of the current understanding of the role of oxidative stress in cancer formation, as well as the potential benefits of antioxidant supplementation in cancer prevention. Additionally, we will discuss both preclinical and clinical studies highlighting the potentials and limitations of preventive antioxidant strategies.
- 3 March 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Antioxidants
- Vol. 12 (3) , 632
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessAntioxidant and Anti-Tumor Effects of Dietary Vitamins A, C, and E
Oxidative stress, a condition characterized by an imbalance between pro-oxidant molecules and antioxidant defense systems, is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to cancer development. This is because the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during oxidative stress can damage DNA, proteins, and lipids to facilitate mutations and other cellular changes that promote cancer growth. Antioxidant supplementation is a potential strategy for decreasing cancer incidence; by reducing oxidative stress, DNA damage and other deleterious cellular changes may be attenuated. Several clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the role of antioxidant supplements in cancer prevention. Some studies have found that antioxidant supplements, such as vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin E, can reduce the risk of certain types of cancer. On the other hand, some studies posit an increased risk of cancer with antioxidant supplement use. In this review, we will provide an overview of the current understanding of the role of oxidative stress in cancer formation, as well as the potential benefits of antioxidant supplementation in cancer prevention. Additionally, we will discuss both preclinical and clinical studies highlighting the potentials and limitations of preventive antioxidant strategies.