Lipeng Xie

Wafer surface defect detection plays an important role in controlling product quality in semiconductor manufacturing, which has become a research hotspot in computer vision. However, the induction and summary of wafer defect detection methods in the existing review literature are not thorough enough and lack an objective analysis and evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of various techniques, which is not conducive to the development of this research field. This paper systematically analyzes the research progress of domestic and foreign scholars in the field of wafer surface defect detection in recent years. Firstly, we introduce the classification of wafer surface defect patterns and their causes. According to the different methods of feature extraction, the current mainstream methods are divided into three categories: the methods based on image signal processing, the methods based on machine learning, and the methods based on deep learning. Moreover, the core ideas of representative algorithms are briefly introduced. Then, the innovations of each method are compared and analyzed, and their limitations are discussed. Finally, we summarize the problems and challenges in the current wafer surface defect detection task, the future research trends in this field, and the new research ideas.

In recent years, air pollutants have become an important issue in meteorological research and an indispensable part of air quality forecasting. To improve the accuracy of the Chinese Unified Atmospheric Chemistry Environment (CUACE) model’s air pollutant forecasts, this paper proposes a solution based on ensemble learning. Firstly, the forecast results of the CUACE model and the corresponding monitoring data are extracted. Then, using feature analysis, we screen the correction factors that affect air quality. The random forest algorithm, XGBoost algorithm, and GBDT algorithm are employed to correct the prediction results of PM_2.5, PM₁₀, and O₃. To further optimize the model, we introduce the grid search method. Finally, we compare and analyze the correction effect and determine the best correction model for the three air pollutants. This approach enhances the precision of the CUACE model’s forecast and improves our understanding of the factors that affect air quality. The experimental results show that the model has a better prediction error correction effect than the traditional machine learning statistical model. After the algorithm correction, the prediction accuracy of PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ is increased by 60%, and the prediction accuracy of O₃ is increased by 70%.