Yu-Hsiang Wang

Background/Objectives: Ground-glass pulmonary nodules are often nonpalpable and not visible during thoracoscopic surgery, making accurate localization important for achieving adequate pathological margins. However, no clinically validated localization-error threshold has been established. We evaluated the association between Dmn and pathological margin adequacy after image-guided thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule resection and sought to identify a clinically relevant localization-accuracy threshold. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 169 patients in a predefined peripheral-lesion cohort who underwent cone-beam computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule localization using hook-wire placement or dye marking in a hybrid operating room, followed by thoracoscopic wedge resection. Dmn was defined as the shortest three-dimensional Euclidean distance from the localization needle tip to the tumor margin. Pathological margin adequacy was defined as a resection margin equal to or greater than the maximum tumor diameter. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of pathological margin inadequacy, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the optimal Dmn cutoff. Results: Dmn was independently associated with pathological margin inadequacy (odds ratio, 1.617; 95% confidence interval, 1.356–1.928; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.827 and an optimal Dmn cutoff of 4.90 mm, with a sensitivity of 71.0% and specificity of 94.2%. Pathological margin inadequacy occurred more frequently in patients with Dmn ≥ 4.9 mm than in those with Dmn < 4.9 mm (73.3% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, a Dmn of approximately 4.9 mm was associated with pathological margin inadequacy after cone-beam computed tomography-guided pulmonary nodule localization and thoracoscopic wedge resection. This value may serve as a candidate intraoperative warning threshold for margin reassessment; however, prospective external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.

Background: Pulmonary nodule localization in a hybrid operating room (OR) followed by thoracoscopic operation presents a viable alternative for early lung cancer treatment, potentially supplanting conventional two-stage preoperative computed tomography-guided localization. This hybrid OR technique enables lesion localization under positive ventilation, contrasting with the traditional method requiring concurrent respiratory motion. This study aimed to evaluate our experience with different ventilator settings and the accuracy of pulmonary nodule localization. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 176 patients with multiple pulmonary nodules who had localization procedures in our hybrid operating room. Ninety-five patients were assigned to the traditional ventilator setting group (tidal volume 8–10 mL/kg) and 81 to the lung-protective strategy group (tidal volume < 8 mL/kg). Localization accuracy was assessed via hybrid computed tomography imaging, ensuring that the needle-to-lesion distance was ≤5 mm. Between-group differences were assessed using the chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Results: Pathological findings revealed primary lung malignancy in 150 patients, inclusive of invasive adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma in situ, and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. Multivariate regression analysis identified tidal volume, nodule count, and localization depth as significant predictors of localization accuracy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that ventilator settings with a tidal volume of 8–10 mL/kg significantly enhanced localization accuracy and slightly improved patient oxygenation. However, additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and establish definitive guidelines for future interventions.

Background: A bronchopleural fistula (BPF) occurs when an abnormal connection forms between the bronchial tubes and pleural cavity, often due to surgery, infection, trauma, radiation, or chemotherapy. The outcomes of both surgical and bronchoscopic treatments frequently prove to be unsatisfactory. Case presentation: Here, we report a case of successful bronchoscopic free fat pad transplantation combined with platelet-rich plasma, effectively addressing a post-lobectomy BPF. Contrast-enhanced chest tomography revealed pleural thickening with heterogeneous consolidations over the right upper and middle lobes, indicative of destructive lung damage and bronchiectasis. The patient underwent thoracoscopic bilobectomy of the lungs. During surgery, severe adhesions and calcification of the chest wall and lung parenchyma were observed. The entire hilar structure was calcified, presenting challenges for dissection, despite the assistance of energy devices. Bronchoscopic intervention was required, during which two abdominal subcutaneous fat pads were retrieved. Conclusion: This innovative approach offers promise in the management of BPF and signals potential advancements in enhancing treatment efficacy and patient recovery.

In centrally located lung tumors, salvage pulmonary resections pose challenges due to adhesions between the pulmonary parenchyma, chest wall, and hilum. This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes associated with Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) usage in thoracoscopic salvage pulmonary resections. Patients with centrally located advanced-stage lung tumors who underwent salvage anatomic resections following systemic or radiotherapy were included. They were categorized into CUSA and non-CUSA groups, and perioperative parameters and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study included 7 patients in the CUSA group and 15 in the non-CUSA group. Despite a longer median surgical time in the CUSA group (3.8 h vs. 6.0 h, p = 0.021), there was a significant reduction in blood loss (100 mL vs. 250 mL, p = 0.014). Multivariate analyses revealed that the use of CUSA and radiotherapy had opposing effects on blood loss (β: −296.7, 95% CI: −24.8 to −568.6, p = 0.034 and β: 282.9, 95% CI: 19.7 to 546.3, p = 0.037, respectively). In conclusion, while using CUSA in the salvage anatomic resection of centrally located lung cancer may result in a longer surgical time, it is crucial in minimizing blood loss during the procedure.

The standard treatment for early-stage lung cancer is complete tumor excision by limited resection of the lung. Preoperative localization is used before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to improve the accuracy of pulmonary nodule excision. However, lung atelectasis and hypoxia resulting from controlling apnea during the localization procedure may affect the localization accuracy. Pre-procedural pulmonary recruitment may improve the respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during localization. In this study, we investigated the potential benefits of pre-localization pulmonary recruitment prior to pulmonary ground-glass nodule localization in a hybrid operating room. We hypothesized that pre-localization pulmonary recruitment would increase the localization accuracy, improve oxygenation, and prevent the need for re-inflation during the localization procedure. We retrospectively enrolled patients with multiple pulmonary nodule localizations before surgical intervention in our hybrid operating room. We compared the localization accuracy between patients who had undergone pre-procedure pulmonary recruitment and patients who had not. Saturation, re-inflation rate, apnea time, procedure-related pneumothorax, and procedure time were also recorded as secondary outcomes. The patients who had undergone pre-procedure recruitment had better saturation, shorter procedure time, and higher localization accuracy. The pre-procedure pulmonary recruitment maneuver was effective in increasing regional lung ventilation, leading to improved oxygenation and localization accuracy.

The standard treatment for early-stage lung cancer is complete tumor excision by limited resection of the lung. Pre-operative localization is used before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to improve the accuracy of pulmonary nodule excision. However, lung atelectasis and hypoxia resulting from controlling apnea during the localization procedure may affect the localization accuracy. Pre-procedural pulmonary recruitment may improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during localization. In this study, we investigated the potential benefits of pre-localization pulmonary recruitment prior to pulmonary ground-glass nodule localization in a hybrid operating room. We hypothesized that pre-localization pulmonary recruitment would increase localization accuracy, improve oxygenation, and prevent the need for re-inflation during the localization procedure. We retrospectively enrolled patients with multiple pulmonary nodule localizations before surgical intervention in our hybrid operating room. We compared localization accuracies between patients who had undergone pre-procedure pulmonary recruitment and patients who had not. Saturation, re-inflation rate, apnea time, procedure-related pneumothorax, and procedure time were also recorded as secondary outcomes. Patients who had undergone pre-procedure recruitment had better saturation, shorter procedure time, and higher localization accuracy. The pre-procedure pulmonary recruitment maneuver was effective in increasing regional lung ventilation, leading to improved oxygenation and localization accuracy.

Background: Few studies have addressed patient preferences in emergent surgical decision making. Aim of the study: Analyzing patient preferences for hand trauma reconstruction to propose a decision-making model. Methods: A conjoint analysis survey was developed with Sawtooth Software. Three common flaps—i.e., a cross-finger flap (CFF), a dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap (DMAPF), and an arterialized venous flap (AVF)—were listed as treatment alternatives. Five attributes corresponding to these flaps were recovery time, total procedure, postoperative care methods, postoperative scar condition, and complication rate. Utility and importance scores were generated from the software, and preference characteristics were evaluated using cluster analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 197 participants with hand trauma. Complication risk received the highest importance score (42.87%), followed by scar condition (21.55%). Cluster analysis classified the participants as “conservative,” “practical,” and “dual-concern”. The dual-concern and conservative groups had more foreign laborers and highly educated participants, respectively, than the other groups. Most participants in the conservative and practical groups preferred DMAPF, whereas those in the dual-concern group favored CFF. Our proposed model consisted of shared decision-making and treatment recommendation pathways. Conclusion: Incorporating patient preferences into the decision-making model can strengthen patient-centered care. Further research on the applications of the proposed model is warranted.

I.A.A.R.C. - International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction Civil Engineering