Shruti G. Kulkarni

The standardized approach in nanoindentation measurements provides a reproducible mechanical characterization of cancer cells.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has become indispensable for studying biological and medical samples. More than two decades of experiments have revealed that cancer cells are softer than healthy cells (for measured cells cultured on stiff substrates). The softness or, more precisely, the larger deformability of cancer cells, primarily independent of cancer types, could be used as a sensitive marker of pathological changes. The wide application of biomechanics in clinics would require designing instruments with specific calibration, data collection, and analysis procedures. For these reasons, such development is, at present, still very limited, hampering the clinical exploitation of mechanical measurements. Here, we propose a standardized operational protocol (SOP), developed within the EU ITN network Phys2BioMed, which allows the detection of the biomechanical properties of living cancer cells regardless of the nanoindentation instruments used (AFMs and other indenters) and the laboratory involved in the research. We standardized the cell cultures, AFM calibration, measurements, and data analysis. This effort resulted in a step-by-step SOP for cell cultures, instrument calibration, measurements, and data analysis, leading to the concordance of the results (Young’s modulus) measured among the six EU laboratories involved. Our results highlight the importance of the SOP in obtaining a reproducible mechanical characterization of cancer cells and paving the way toward exploiting biomechanics for diagnostic purposes in clinics.

We have measured the elastic properties of live cells by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) using different tip geometries commonly used in AFM studies. Soft 4‐sided pyramidal probes (spring constant = 12 and 30 mN/m, radius 20 nm), 3‐sided pyramidal probes (spring constant = 100 mN/m, radius 65‐75 nm), flat (circular) probes (spring constant = 63 mN/m, radius 290 nm) and spherical probes (spring constant = 43 mN/m, radius 5 μm) have been used. Cells (3T3 fibroblasts) having elastic moduli around 0.5 kPa were investigated. We found that cell measured stiffness shows a systematic dependence on tip geometry: the sharper the tip, the higher the average modulus values. We hypothesize that the blunter the tip, the larger the contact area over which the mechanical response is measured or averaged. If there are small‐scale stiffer areas (like actin bundles) they will be easier to pick up by a sharp probe. This effect can be seen in the wider distribution of the histograms of the measured elastic moduli on cells. Furthermore, non‐linear responses of cells may be present due to the high average pressures applied by sharp probes, which would lead to an overestimation of the Young's modulus. Pressure versus contact radius simulations for the different tip geometries for a 0.5 kPa sample suggested similar average pressure for Bio‐MLCTs, PFQNM and cut tips, except spherical tips that showed much lower average pressure at the same 400 nm indentation. However, real data of the cells suggested different results. Using the same indentation depth (400 nm), PFQNM and Bio‐MLCTs showed similar average pressure and it decreased for cut and spherical tips. The calculated contact area at 400 nm cell indentation, using the obtained apparent Young's modulus for each tip geometry, showed the following distribution: Bio‐MLCTs < PFQNM < cut << spherical. In summary, tip geometry as well as average pressure and tip‐sample contact area are important parameters to take into account when measuring mechanical properties of soft samples. The larger the tip radius, the larger the contact area that will lead to a more evenly distribution of the applied pressure.