Andrew B. Adams

Background.: Transplant center processes for determining candidacy are complex, poorly documented, ambiguous, and variable across centers. Opaque and nonstandardized transplant processes can compromise data collection and lead to inconsistent outcomes. Methods.: To understand process variation and data quality in transplantation, we surveyed 8 abdominal transplant centers in an existing research consortium about their processes of care for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplants. We used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to identify variation related to people, tasks, tools, environment, and processes. Results.: Centers varied in their processes across phases of transplant care, including screening referral, waitlist maintenance, and posttransplant follow-up. Regarding referrals, transplant centers chose their locations for outreach to and education for referring providers based on historical density or by request (63%). Additionally, screening of referred patients for transplant evaluation varied across centers related to screening method, screening timing/attempts, and who determines eligibility. For patients declined for listing, only 25% of centers had a formal appeal process (liver only), and most centers had either an informal appeal process (liver: 50%, kidney and pancreas: 87.5%) or none (liver: 25%, kidney and pancreas: 12.5%). Conclusions.: In light of increased national attention to improving data collection, processes of care, and workforce efficiency, our findings provide insight into processes that may inform effective transplant practices and identify targets for future interventions.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies are used to prevent life-threatening complications associated with thrombosis. While there are numerous clinical guidelines for antithrombotic medications, there is an incomplete understanding of whether these interventions yield similar effects in preclinical models, potentially impacting their predictive value for translational studies on the development of medical devices, therapies, and surgical techniques. Due to their close physiologic similarities to humans, we employed nonhuman primates (NHPs) using a reverse translational approach to analyze the response to clinical regimens of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and aspirin to assess concordance with typical human responses and evaluate the predictive validity of this model. We evaluate activated clotting time (ACT) in nine rhesus and six cynomolgus macaques following the intraoperative administration of intravenous unfractionated heparin (100–300 U/kg) reflecting the clinical dose range. We observed a significant dose-dependent effect of heparin on ACT (low-dose average = 114.1 s; high-dose average = 148.3 s; p = 0.0011). LMWH and aspirin, common clinical antithrombotic prophylactics, were evaluated in three rhesus macaques. NHPs achieved therapeutic Anti-Xa levels (mean = 0.64 U/mL) and ARU (mean = 459) via VerifyNow, adhering to clinical guidance using 1.0 mg/kg enoxaparin and 81 mg aspirin. Clinical dosing strategies for unfractionated heparin, LMWH, and aspirin were safe and effective in NHPs, with no development of thrombosis or bleeding complications intraoperatively, postoperatively, or for prophylaxis. Our findings suggest that coagulation studies, performed as an integrative part of studies on biologics, bioengineered devices, or transplantation in NHPs, can be extrapolated to the clinical situation with high predictive validity.

Costimulation blockade using belatacept results in improved renal function after kidney transplant as well as decreased likelihood of death/graft loss and reduced cardiovascular risk; however, higher rates and grades of acute rejection have prevented its widespread clinical adoption. Treatment with belatacept blocks both positive (CD28) and negative (CTLA-4) T cell signaling. CD28-selective therapies may offer improved potency by blocking CD28-mediated costimulation while leaving CTLA-4 mediated coinhibitory signals intact. Here we test a novel domain antibody directed at CD28 (anti-CD28 dAb (BMS-931699)) in a non-human primate kidney transplant model. Sixteen macaques underwent native nephrectomy and received life-sustaining renal allotransplantation from an MHC-mismatched donor. Animals were treated with belatacept alone, anti-CD28 dAb alone, or anti-CD28 dAb plus clinically relevant maintenance (MMF, Steroids) and induction therapy with either anti-IL-2R or T cell depletion. Treatment with anti-CD28 dAb extended survival compared to belatacept monotherapy (MST 187 vs. 29 days, p=0.07). The combination of anti-CD28 dAb and conventional immunosuppression further prolonged survival to MST ∼270 days. Animals maintained protective immunity with no significant infectious issues. These data demonstrate CD28-directed therapy is a safe and effective next-generation costimulatory blockade strategy with a demonstrated survival benefit and presumed advantage over belatacept by maintaining intact CTLA-4 coinhibitory signaling.