Razmik Ghukasyan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Razmik Ghukasyan has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Timothy R. Donahue
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
48 shared publications - Alykhan Premji
Veterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA
47 shared publications - Amanda Labora
Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
47 shared publications - Caius G. Radu
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
47 shared publications - Charlotte Chan
Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
47 shared publications - Evan R. Abt
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
47 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 1 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 1 STING agonist diABZI synergizes with MAPK inhibition in PDAC by enhancing apoptosis.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 1 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 1 STING agonist diABZI synergizes with MAPK inhibition in PDAC by enhancing apoptosis.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 4 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 4 Immunoblot analysis demonstrating the effect of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN on CFPAC-1 and SUIT2 parental cells compared to their respective IFNAR-deficient isogenic cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CFPAC-1 parental and IFNAR1-KO cells exposed to ± 1 µM diABZI ± 100 nM trametinib for 24 h (C)Immunoblot analysis of the effects of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN ± 1 µM diABZI for 24 h.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 4 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 4 Immunoblot analysis demonstrating the effect of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN on CFPAC-1 and SUIT2 parental cells compared to their respective IFNAR-deficient isogenic cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CFPAC-1 parental and IFNAR1-KO cells exposed to ± 1 µM diABZI ± 100 nM trametinib for 24 h (C)Immunoblot analysis of the effects of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN ± 1 µM diABZI for 24 h.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 2 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 2 Tumor growth is inhibited by STING agonism and MEK inhibition in vivo.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 2 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 2 Tumor growth is inhibited by STING agonism and MEK inhibition in vivo.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 3 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 3 MEK inhibition amplifies STING-induced transcription of IFNB1, IL-6, and TNFA in multiple PDAC cell lines.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 3 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 3 MEK inhibition amplifies STING-induced transcription of IFNB1, IL-6, and TNFA in multiple PDAC cell lines.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 5 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 5 IL6 is not responsible for the synergistic effects of STING agonism and MEK inhibition.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 5 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Fig. 5 IL6 is not responsible for the synergistic effects of STING agonism and MEK inhibition.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Data 1 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Resources and Table
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Data 1 from MEK Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to STING Agonism by Tumor Cell–intrinsic Amplification of Type I IFN Signaling
Supplementary Resources and Table
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 3 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 3 MEK inhibition amplifies STING-induced transcription of IFNB1, IL-6, and TNFA in multiple PDAC cell lines.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 3 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 3 MEK inhibition amplifies STING-induced transcription of IFNB1, IL-6, and TNFA in multiple PDAC cell lines.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 5 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 5 IL6 is not responsible for the synergistic effects of STING agonism and MEK inhibition.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 5 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 5 IL6 is not responsible for the synergistic effects of STING agonism and MEK inhibition.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 4 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 4 Immunoblot analysis demonstrating the effect of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN on CFPAC-1 and SUIT2 parental cells compared to their respective IFNAR-deficient isogenic cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CFPAC-1 parental and IFNAR1-KO cells exposed to ± 1 µM diABZI ± 100 nM trametinib for 24 h (C)Immunoblot analysis of the effects of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN ± 1 µM diABZI for 24 h.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 4 from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Supplementary Fig. 4 Immunoblot analysis demonstrating the effect of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN on CFPAC-1 and SUIT2 parental cells compared to their respective IFNAR-deficient isogenic cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CFPAC-1 parental and IFNAR1-KO cells exposed to ± 1 µM diABZI ± 100 nM trametinib for 24 h (C)Immunoblot analysis of the effects of ± 100 U/ml exogenous IFN ± 1 µM diABZI for 24 h.
- Open Access
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Purpose: STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) agonists are currently in development for treatment of solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Response rates to STING agonists alone have been promising yet modest and combination therapies will likely be required to elicit their full potency. We sought to identify combination therapies and mechanisms that augment the tumor-cell intrinsic effect of therapeutically relevant STING agonists apart from their known effects on tumor immunity. Experimental Design: We screened 430 kinase inhibitors to identify synergistic effectors of tumor cell death with diABZI, an intravenously administered and systemically available STING agonist. We deciphered the mechanisms of synergy with STING agonism that cause tumor cell death in vitro and tumor regression in vivo. Results: We found that MEK inhibitors caused the greatest synergy with diABZI and that this effect was most pronounced in cells with high STING expression. MEK inhibition enhanced the ability of STING agonism to induce Type I interferon-dependent cell death in vitro and tumor regression in vivo. We parsed NF-κB-dependent and independent mechanisms that mediate STING-driven Type I interferon production and show that MEK signaling inhibits this effect by suppressing NF-κB activation. Conclusions: Our results highlight the cytotoxic effects of STING agonism on PDAC cells that are independent of tumor immunity, and that these therapeutic benefits of STING agonism can be synergistically enhanced by MEK inhibition.
- 16 September 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from MEK inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer to STING agonism by tumor-cell intrinsic amplification of type I interferon signaling
Purpose: STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) agonists are currently in development for treatment of solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Response rates to STING agonists alone have been promising yet modest and combination therapies will likely be required to elicit their full potency. We sought to identify combination therapies and mechanisms that augment the tumor-cell intrinsic effect of therapeutically relevant STING agonists apart from their known effects on tumor immunity. Experimental Design: We screened 430 kinase inhibitors to identify synergistic effectors of tumor cell death with diABZI, an intravenously administered and systemically available STING agonist. We deciphered the mechanisms of synergy with STING agonism that cause tumor cell death in vitro and tumor regression in vivo. Results: We found that MEK inhibitors caused the greatest synergy with diABZI and that this effect was most pronounced in cells with high STING expression. MEK inhibition enhanced the ability of STING agonism to induce Type I interferon-dependent cell death in vitro and tumor regression in vivo. We parsed NF-κB-dependent and independent mechanisms that mediate STING-driven Type I interferon production and show that MEK signaling inhibits this effect by suppressing NF-κB activation. Conclusions: Our results highlight the cytotoxic effects of STING agonism on PDAC cells that are independent of tumor immunity, and that these therapeutic benefits of STING agonism can be synergistically enhanced by MEK inhibition.