Lu Cheng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lu Cheng has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Taisheng Chen
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
2 shared publications Bingxuan Du
School of Geography Science and Geomatics Engineering Suzhou University of Science and Technology Suzhou China
1 shared publication- Changan Sun
School of Education Suzhou University of Science and Technology Suzhou China
1 shared publication Junpeng Zhao
East China Academy of Inventory and Planning of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publicationMenglin Chen
School of Geography Science and Geomatics, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China
1 shared publication- Qingsheng Guo
School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 12 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Transactions in GIS
- Vol. 30 (7)
The Influence of Sense of Direction on Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Reference Frame Representation: An Investigation Utilizing Behavioral and Eye‐Tracking Metrics
Sense of direction is one of the important factors influencing the egocentric and allocentric reference frame representation in daily wayfinding. Existing behavioral studies have shown a significant correlation between sense of direction and the accuracy of allocentric reference frame representation. However, the relationship between sense of direction and egocentric reference frame representation remains unclear, and it is still not well understood how sense of direction affects the visual attention characteristics of these two types of spatial frame representations. To address these, we employed behavioral and eye‐tracking metrics to compare the performance of individuals with a good or poor sense of direction on tasks involving egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frame representation. The results revealed that, in the egocentric task, individuals with a poor sense of direction demonstrated longer task completion time, lower accuracy in angle and distance estimation, and lower visual processing efficiency, indicating the core source of individual differences in sense of direction lies in the cognitive processing level. In the allocentric task, individuals with a poor sense of direction performed worse behaviorally (lower accuracy, longer task completion time), but their eye‐tracking metrics showed no significant difference from those with a good sense of direction. This inconsistency between eye‐tracking and behavioral metrics indicates that the influence of sense of direction on spatial performance is reference‐frame‐specific, and that environmental cues provide only limited compensation for deficiencies in spatial representation ability. This study deepens the understanding of the psychological mechanisms through which sense of direction influences spatial reference frame representation.
- 12 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Transactions in GIS
- Vol. 30 (7)
The Influence of Sense of Direction on Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Reference Frame Representation: An Investigation Utilizing Behavioral and Eye‐Tracking Metrics
Sense of direction is one of the important factors influencing the egocentric and allocentric reference frame representation in daily wayfinding. Existing behavioral studies have shown a significant correlation between sense of direction and the accuracy of allocentric reference frame representation. However, the relationship between sense of direction and egocentric reference frame representation remains unclear, and it is still not well understood how sense of direction affects the visual attention characteristics of these two types of spatial frame representations. To address these, we employed behavioral and eye‐tracking metrics to compare the performance of individuals with a good or poor sense of direction on tasks involving egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frame representation. The results revealed that, in the egocentric task, individuals with a poor sense of direction demonstrated longer task completion time, lower accuracy in angle and distance estimation, and lower visual processing efficiency, indicating the core source of individual differences in sense of direction lies in the cognitive processing level. In the allocentric task, individuals with a poor sense of direction performed worse behaviorally (lower accuracy, longer task completion time), but their eye‐tracking metrics showed no significant difference from those with a good sense of direction. This inconsistency between eye‐tracking and behavioral metrics indicates that the influence of sense of direction on spatial performance is reference‐frame‐specific, and that environmental cues provide only limited compensation for deficiencies in spatial representation ability. This study deepens the understanding of the psychological mechanisms through which sense of direction influences spatial reference frame representation.
- Open Access
- 4 May 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Geocarto International
- Vol. 38 (1)
Integrated generalization method of contours and rivers considering geographic characteristics
In the integrated generalization of contours and rivers, it is more important to consider the generalization of their geographical characteristics in addition to focusing on the graph generalization. Therefore, we elaborated on the geographical characteristics on which the contours and rivers depend in the integrated generalization, qualitatively describe and quantitatively characterize the geographical characteristics (spatial characteristics and geographical elements information content characteristics), and put forward the integrated generalization method of contours and rivers considering geographical characteristics. Based on the geographical characteristics, this paper first identifies the relief and river network morphology, then as an essential terrain constraint, the spatial analysis and selection of topographic feature lines were carried out. Secondly, according to the integrated generalization method, the contours and rivers were discretized into 3D points along with describing semantic information and giving weights. Finally, the integrated generalization considering geographical characteristics experiment was implemented and well generalization results were obtained.
- 4 May 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Geocarto International
- Vol. 38 (1)
Open AccessIntegrated generalization method of contours and rivers considering geographic characteristics
In the integrated generalization of contours and rivers, it is more important to consider the generalization of their geographical characteristics in addition to focusing on the graph generalization. Therefore, we elaborated on the geographical characteristics on which the contours and rivers depend in the integrated generalization, qualitatively describe and quantitatively characterize the geographical characteristics (spatial characteristics and geographical elements information content characteristics), and put forward the integrated generalization method of contours and rivers considering geographical characteristics. Based on the geographical characteristics, this paper first identifies the relief and river network morphology, then as an essential terrain constraint, the spatial analysis and selection of topographic feature lines were carried out. Secondly, according to the integrated generalization method, the contours and rivers were discretized into 3D points along with describing semantic information and giving weights. Finally, the integrated generalization considering geographical characteristics experiment was implemented and well generalization results were obtained.