Federico Carcione
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Federico Carcione has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Saverio Bartalini
Istituto Nazionale di Ottica (Italy)
2 shared publications - Amelia Detti1 shared publication
- Davide Mazzotti
CNR-INO -Istituto Nazionale di Ottica Via Carrara 1 -50019 Sesto Fiorentino FI Italy
1 shared publication - Gustavo Adrián Defeo
CTC Ars Tinctoria s.r.l., Via del Bosco 125, 56029 Santa Croce sull’Arno, Italy
1 shared publication - Iacopo Galli
CNR-INO -Istituto Nazionale di Ottica Via Carrara 1 -50019 Sesto Fiorentino FI Italy
1 shared publication Luca Varricchio
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 483
A laser-based saturated-absorption cavity ring-down technology for precise biobased content analysis of plastic samples
- 26 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 483
Open AccessA laser-based saturated-absorption cavity ring-down technology for precise biobased content analysis of plastic samples
- Open Access
Material Circularity: A Novel Method for Biobased Carbon Quantification of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives
In the past, climate change led the United Nations to define the Sustainable Development Goals Statement “blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future” and the European Commission to promote the “bioeconomy” concept and to launch the Green Deal Policy. Accordingly, the COP26 conference proposed a drastic reduction of fossil-based fuels and materials, in favor of biobased materials which should ensure intrinsic carbon neutrality. Contextually, many startups and established materials suppliers proposed new, trendy materials claiming sustainability advantages but, in many cases, without robust scientific backing. The need for transparency in terms of circularity led us to exploit a fast, reliable and easily deployable analytical method for assessing the biogenic carbon fraction in a variety of industrial materials. Our research team identified a radiocarbon analysis based on Saturated-absorption CAvity Ring-down (SCAR) spectroscopy as a quick and effective method for such a scope. Here we demonstrate its use for the determination of biogenic/fossil carbon proportions of polymeric and coated materials such as leather, coated textiles and trendy alternatives used in the fashion industry, with the scope of defining their intrinsic renewable content. The reliability of the SCAR method is validated through a comparison with the results obtained by the benchmark technique.
Open AccessMaterial Circularity: A Novel Method for Biobased Carbon Quantification of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives
In the past, climate change led the United Nations to define the Sustainable Development Goals Statement “blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future” and the European Commission to promote the “bioeconomy” concept and to launch the Green Deal Policy. Accordingly, the COP26 conference proposed a drastic reduction of fossil-based fuels and materials, in favor of biobased materials which should ensure intrinsic carbon neutrality. Contextually, many startups and established materials suppliers proposed new, trendy materials claiming sustainability advantages but, in many cases, without robust scientific backing. The need for transparency in terms of circularity led us to exploit a fast, reliable and easily deployable analytical method for assessing the biogenic carbon fraction in a variety of industrial materials. Our research team identified a radiocarbon analysis based on Saturated-absorption CAvity Ring-down (SCAR) spectroscopy as a quick and effective method for such a scope. Here we demonstrate its use for the determination of biogenic/fossil carbon proportions of polymeric and coated materials such as leather, coated textiles and trendy alternatives used in the fashion industry, with the scope of defining their intrinsic renewable content. The reliability of the SCAR method is validated through a comparison with the results obtained by the benchmark technique.