Nguyen Thanh Van
Nguyen Thanh Van has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abd-ElRahman Mohamed Makram
School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 shared publications - Nguyen Tien Huy
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
4 shared publications - Randa Elsheikh
University Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz Switzerland
4 shared publications - Atsuko Imoto
School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
2 shared publications Gibson Omwansa Javes
School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
2 shared publications- Hirotsugu Aiga
Nagasaki University
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Medical Case Reports
- Vol. 19 (1) , 227
Fatal Mycobacterium avium meningitis in an HIV-negative Vietnamese man: a case report
Background: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are environmental mycobacteria that rarely cause human disease, especially in the central nervous system. Central nervous system infection by Mycobacterium avium complex, the most common pathogen among nontuberculous mycobacteria species, is rare and seldom reported, even in those with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. We describe a case of Mycobacterium avium complex meningitis with cerebral hemorrhage in an human immunodeficiency virus uninfected man in Vietnam. Case presentation: A 56-year-old Vietnamese man with hypertension was hospitalized with a 5-day history of headache, dizziness, low-grade fever, and unresponsive to 5 days of oral antibiotics. A brain magnetic resonance imaging, performed on day 12, showed hydrocephalus and lacunar infarct. The patient did not improve with 8 days of empirical treatment with ceftriaxone, vancomycin, dexamethasone, and meropenem, and was transferred to a referral hospital for tropical diseases. At the second hospital admission, a cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a white cell count of 22,518 cells/μL with 81% neutrophils, protein 1.72 g/L, and glucose 0.85 mmol/L. Acid-fast bacilli smear of the cerebrospinal fluid was positive. Molecular testing of the cerebrospinal fluid was negative on GeneXpert Ultra testing, while the line probe assay was positive for Mycobacterium avium. Blood cultures at two sites, cerebrospinal fluid cultures for bacteria and fungi, and human immunodeficiency virus Ag/Ab test were negative. The patient was continuously administered meropenem with the addition of azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol. Then, 1 day after nontuberculous mycobacteria treatment, he developed right-sided hemiplegia, and brain computed tomography showed a hemorrhage in the parietal area, adjacent to the left lateral ventricle, and left lateral intraventricular hemorrhage shifts the midline to the right. He was transferred to the third referral general hospital and died 22 days after the onset of symptoms. Conclusion: Nontuberculous mycobacteria-central nervous system infection might mimic unresponsive pyogenic bacterial meningitis. A rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for initiating appropriate therapy for this deadly disease.
- 15 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Medical Case Reports
- Vol. 19 (1) , 227
Open AccessFatal Mycobacterium avium meningitis in an HIV-negative Vietnamese man: a case report
Background: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are environmental mycobacteria that rarely cause human disease, especially in the central nervous system. Central nervous system infection by Mycobacterium avium complex, the most common pathogen among nontuberculous mycobacteria species, is rare and seldom reported, even in those with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. We describe a case of Mycobacterium avium complex meningitis with cerebral hemorrhage in an human immunodeficiency virus uninfected man in Vietnam. Case presentation: A 56-year-old Vietnamese man with hypertension was hospitalized with a 5-day history of headache, dizziness, low-grade fever, and unresponsive to 5 days of oral antibiotics. A brain magnetic resonance imaging, performed on day 12, showed hydrocephalus and lacunar infarct. The patient did not improve with 8 days of empirical treatment with ceftriaxone, vancomycin, dexamethasone, and meropenem, and was transferred to a referral hospital for tropical diseases. At the second hospital admission, a cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a white cell count of 22,518 cells/μL with 81% neutrophils, protein 1.72 g/L, and glucose 0.85 mmol/L. Acid-fast bacilli smear of the cerebrospinal fluid was positive. Molecular testing of the cerebrospinal fluid was negative on GeneXpert Ultra testing, while the line probe assay was positive for Mycobacterium avium. Blood cultures at two sites, cerebrospinal fluid cultures for bacteria and fungi, and human immunodeficiency virus Ag/Ab test were negative. The patient was continuously administered meropenem with the addition of azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol. Then, 1 day after nontuberculous mycobacteria treatment, he developed right-sided hemiplegia, and brain computed tomography showed a hemorrhage in the parietal area, adjacent to the left lateral ventricle, and left lateral intraventricular hemorrhage shifts the midline to the right. He was transferred to the third referral general hospital and died 22 days after the onset of symptoms. Conclusion: Nontuberculous mycobacteria-central nervous system infection might mimic unresponsive pyogenic bacterial meningitis. A rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for initiating appropriate therapy for this deadly disease.
- Open Access
- 13 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1
Correction: Tips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol
- 13 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1
Open AccessCorrection: Tips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol
- Open Access
- 29 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-10
Tips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol
A research protocol is a document that outlines the proposed research idea and is submitted to funding agencies, institutions, or journals for approval. Writing a research protocol represents a challenge, particularly for early-career researchers. In this guide, we aim to provide detailed guidance with the key components and offer practical tips for crafting a research protocol in line with the various study designs. Specifically, the structure of a research protocol should contain the following items: (1) a title that is specific, catchy, and impressive within the word limitation; (2) an abstract that briefs the critical points of the study; (3) an introduction highlighting the study context from broad to narrow and defining the knowledge gap; (4) a justification underlining the significance of the proposed study; (5) Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) objective(s) and aim(s); (6) a methodology covering seven sub-items, including [i] study design and settings, [ii] study subjects, [iii] sample size calculation and sampling, [iv] participants recruitment and follow-up, [v] questionnaire development, [vi] potential variables and outcomes, and [vii] data analysis plan; (7) dissemination of the results; (8) ethics and conflict of interests; (9) budgets analysis/ funding disclosure; and (10) references. This guide will give an overview of these steps and provide clear and concise tips on how to successfully draft a scientific protocol. With careful planning and appropriate guidance, it is possible to develop a well-structured and compelling protocol to obtain approval for the conduction of the study or funding from agencies, institutions, or organizations.
- 29 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-10
Open AccessTips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol
A research protocol is a document that outlines the proposed research idea and is submitted to funding agencies, institutions, or journals for approval. Writing a research protocol represents a challenge, particularly for early-career researchers. In this guide, we aim to provide detailed guidance with the key components and offer practical tips for crafting a research protocol in line with the various study designs. Specifically, the structure of a research protocol should contain the following items: (1) a title that is specific, catchy, and impressive within the word limitation; (2) an abstract that briefs the critical points of the study; (3) an introduction highlighting the study context from broad to narrow and defining the knowledge gap; (4) a justification underlining the significance of the proposed study; (5) Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) objective(s) and aim(s); (6) a methodology covering seven sub-items, including [i] study design and settings, [ii] study subjects, [iii] sample size calculation and sampling, [iv] participants recruitment and follow-up, [v] questionnaire development, [vi] potential variables and outcomes, and [vii] data analysis plan; (7) dissemination of the results; (8) ethics and conflict of interests; (9) budgets analysis/ funding disclosure; and (10) references. This guide will give an overview of these steps and provide clear and concise tips on how to successfully draft a scientific protocol. With careful planning and appropriate guidance, it is possible to develop a well-structured and compelling protocol to obtain approval for the conduction of the study or funding from agencies, institutions, or organizations.
- Open Access
- 11 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Infectious Medicine
- Vol. 2 (2) , 74-88
Monkeypox: A comprehensive review of a multifaceted virus
- 11 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Infectious Medicine
- Vol. 2 (2) , 74-88
Open AccessMonkeypox: A comprehensive review of a multifaceted virus
- 9 August 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 77 (6) , 2118-2127
Acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children: Behind the statistics
Since April 2022, the world has been witnessing a rapidly spreading outbreak of acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children < 16 years old that has affected several countries around the world. Most of the cases have presented with the clinical picture of severe hepatitis that has led to resorting to liver transplantation in several cases. Despite the numerous theories that have been suggested on the possible underlying etiologies of the outbreak, an association with hepatitis A–E viruses and a link to COVID‐19 vaccines have been excluded. Adenovirus serotype 41 has been detected in numerous cases, which makes it the most likely underlying cause of the disease. Nevertheless, other hypotheses are being investigated to justify the severity of the clinical picture, which is not typical of this type of virus. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about the outbreak, highlight the suggested working hypotheses, and report the public health measures undertaken to tackle the outbreak.
- 9 August 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 77 (6) , 2118-2127
Acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children: Behind the statistics
Since April 2022, the world has been witnessing a rapidly spreading outbreak of acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children < 16 years old that has affected several countries around the world. Most of the cases have presented with the clinical picture of severe hepatitis that has led to resorting to liver transplantation in several cases. Despite the numerous theories that have been suggested on the possible underlying etiologies of the outbreak, an association with hepatitis A–E viruses and a link to COVID‐19 vaccines have been excluded. Adenovirus serotype 41 has been detected in numerous cases, which makes it the most likely underlying cause of the disease. Nevertheless, other hypotheses are being investigated to justify the severity of the clinical picture, which is not typical of this type of virus. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about the outbreak, highlight the suggested working hypotheses, and report the public health measures undertaken to tackle the outbreak.