Camelia Petrescu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Camelia Petrescu has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Valeriu David
Department of Electrical Measurements and Electrotechnical Materials, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Gh. Asachi Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania
3 shared publications - Eduard Lunca
Department of Electrical Measurements and Materials, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 23 Professor Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iasi, Romania
1 shared publication - Ionel Pavel
“Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași , Faculty of Electrical Engineering , Iași , Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (17) , 2801
Preface to the Special Issue “Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, 3rd Edition”
The topic “Modeling and Simulation in Engineering”, proposed in 2021 as part of the section “Engineering Mathematics”, and later as part of “Control Theory and Mechanics”, covers a large array of technical fields, thus arousing much interest among researchers
- 1 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 13 (17) , 2801
Open AccessPreface to the Special Issue “Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, 3rd Edition”
The topic “Modeling and Simulation in Engineering”, proposed in 2021 as part of the section “Engineering Mathematics”, and later as part of “Control Theory and Mechanics”, covers a large array of technical fields, thus arousing much interest among researchers
- Open Access
- 15 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 11 (10) , 2292
Estimation of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Magnetic Fields around Overhead Power Lines—A Case Study
Due to the growing number, diversity and spreading of magnetic field sources, an increasing need to determine the field levels of human exposure has arisen. Some of the most encountered sources are the overhead power lines (OPL) and the determination of spatial and temporal variation of the magnetic fields produced by OPLs is a challenge. In this paper a hybrid method for the estimation of the temporal and spatial distribution of the magnetic flux density B caused by OPLs, based on experimental measurements and on numerical and analytical simulations, is presented. Thus, using a small number of simultaneous spot measurements correlated with a long-term survey, maps of the magnetic flux density distribution on extended areas are established, for several time instances. The proposed method is verified using two sets of different measurements and the results obtained through simulation. The difference between the estimated and simulated values of B is under 5.5%, which is considered acceptable considering that B spans over a large set of values (724 nT ÷ 1375 nT) in the location of the long-term survey procedure. The possibilities and limitations of the proposed method are discussed.
- 15 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 11 (10) , 2292
Open AccessEstimation of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Magnetic Fields around Overhead Power Lines—A Case Study
Due to the growing number, diversity and spreading of magnetic field sources, an increasing need to determine the field levels of human exposure has arisen. Some of the most encountered sources are the overhead power lines (OPL) and the determination of spatial and temporal variation of the magnetic fields produced by OPLs is a challenge. In this paper a hybrid method for the estimation of the temporal and spatial distribution of the magnetic flux density B caused by OPLs, based on experimental measurements and on numerical and analytical simulations, is presented. Thus, using a small number of simultaneous spot measurements correlated with a long-term survey, maps of the magnetic flux density distribution on extended areas are established, for several time instances. The proposed method is verified using two sets of different measurements and the results obtained through simulation. The difference between the estimated and simulated values of B is under 5.5%, which is considered acceptable considering that B spans over a large set of values (724 nT ÷ 1375 nT) in the location of the long-term survey procedure. The possibilities and limitations of the proposed method are discussed.
- Open Access
- 7 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 10 (14) , 2387
Preface to the Special Issue on “Modelling and Simulation in Engineering”
The continuing achievements in Information Technology and Computer science in recent decades provide new tools for engineers in the design of devices and systems, with significant advances both in numerical and in analytical methods of analysis
- 7 July 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 10 (14) , 2387
Open AccessPreface to the Special Issue on “Modelling and Simulation in Engineering”
The continuing achievements in Information Technology and Computer science in recent decades provide new tools for engineers in the design of devices and systems, with significant advances both in numerical and in analytical methods of analysis
- Open Access
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 116, 3266-3270
Teaching Interpreting
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 116, 3266-3270
Open AccessTeaching Interpreting