Peter A. Singer

In healthcare today, decisions are made in the face of serious resource constraints. Healthcare managers are struggling to provide high quality care, manage resources effectively, and meet changing patient needs. Healthcare managers who are constantly making difficult resource decisions desire a way to improve their priority setting processes. Despite the wealth of existing priority setting literature (for example, program budgeting and marginal analysis, accountability for reasonableness, the 'describe-evaluate-improve' strategy) there are still no tools to evaluate how healthcare resources are prioritised. This paper describes the development and piloting of a process to evaluate priority setting in health institutions. The evaluation process was designed to examine the procedural and substantive dimensions of priority setting using a multi-methods approach, including a staff survey, decision-maker interviews, and document analysis.

Experience with public engagement activities regarding the risks and benefits of science and technology (S&T) is growing, especially in the industrialized world. However, public engagement in the developing world regarding S&T risks and benefits to explore health issues has not been widely explored.

Nature Biotechnology journal featuring biotechnology articles and science research papers of commercial interest in pharmaceutical, medical, and environmental sciences.

The benefits of genomics and biotechnology are concentrated primarily in the industrialized world, while their potential to combat neglected diseases in the developing world has been largely untapped. Without building developing world biotechnology capacity to address local health needs, this disparity will only intensify. To assess the potential of genomics to address health needs in the developing world, the McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health, along with local partners, organized five courses on Genomics and Public Health Policy in the developing world. The overall objective of the courses was to collectively explore how to best harness genomics to improve health in each region. This article presents and analyzes the recommendations from all five courses.

The Grand Challenges initiative has 44 projects worldwide aimed at addressing diseases of the poor. What are the ethical, social, and cultural issues that the initiative faces?

While the past century has seen significant improvement in life expectancies in the developed world, it has also witnessed diseases like HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis ravage populations in the developing world. In some Sub-Saharan African countries, life expectancies have plummeted to less than 40 years--nearly half of those in developed countries. Unequal access to the benefits of science and technology, including medical advances, exacerbate this disparity. In order to address the challenge of global health inequities and strengthen the role of science and technology innovation in contributing to real solutions, the Canadian Program on Genomics and Global health (CPGGH), based at the University of Toronto, has identified three guiding questions: Which genomics-related technologies are most likely to improve the health of people in developing countries?; How can developing countries harness these technologies for health development?; and What can industrialized countries do to assist developing countries?