Sara Noorolouny

Objectives. The complex anatomy of C-shaped canals poses challenges for clinicians compared to teeth with normal root canal anatomy. This study is aimed at evaluating the frequency and morphology of C-shaped canals in the mandibular first and second molars among an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods. This cross-sectional study evaluated 369 CBCT scans from the archives of a radiology clinic in Ardabil, Iran. The sample included 248 mandibular first molars and 478 mandibular second molars. The presence of C-shaped canals and their classification, according to Fan et al., were evaluated at four levels: orifice, coronal, middle, and apical. Prevalence based on gender and tooth type was also assessed. Results. A total of 199 (53.9%) males and 170 (46.1%) females were evaluated. C-shaped canals were found in 11 (8 males/3 females) out of 248 (4.4%) first molars and in 20 (11 males/9 females) out of 478 (3.7%) second molars. The C2 configuration was most prevalent in the orifice, coronal, and middle levels of both molar types, while C3 and C4 morphologies were most commonly found apically in the second and first molars, respectively. A significant difference in configuration was found only at the coronal level between molar types. A significant association between gender and configuration was observed only at the orifice level of the second molars. No other significant differences were found ( ). Conclusion. C-shaped canal configurations should be expected in 4.4% of mandibular first molars and 3.7% of the second molars in this Iranian population, with a predominance of the C2 configuration in the orifice, coronal, and middle levels.

Objectives. This study assessed the quality of endodontic treatment and the prevalence of procedural errors in permanent mandibular molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 328 CBCT scans (182 females and 146 males) of endodontically treated mandibular molars retrieved from the archives of two radiology centers in Ardabil city, Iran, in 2019. Mandibular molars were evaluated on sagittal, coronal, and axial sections regarding obturation length, obturation density (voids), missed canals, broken instruments, apical perforation, strip perforation, ledge formation, transportation, root fracture, root resorption, and periapical lesions by a senior dental student under the supervision of an oral and maxillofacial radiologist and an endodontist. Differences between the frequency of procedural errors and tooth type and gender were analyzed by the chi-square test. Results. The frequency of underfilling, missed canals, overfilling, voids, apical perforation, transportation, ledge formation, broken instruments, root fracture, strip perforation, root resorption, and periapical lesions was 34.8%, 17.4%, 16.8%, 14.3%, 7.3%, 6.1%, 4.3%, 3%, 1.2%, 0.6%, 5.5%, and 46%, respectively. The frequency of root fracture was significantly higher in females than in males . The prevalence of underfilling was the highest in right second molars (47.2%), followed by right first molars, left second molars, and left first molars . The frequency of transportation was maximum in right first molars (10%), followed by right second molars, left first molars, and left second molars . Conclusion. Underfilling, missed canals, and overfilling were the most prevalent procedural errors in mandibular molars in our study population.

A range of procedural errors can occur when performing endodontic treatment on posterior teeth. These errors may decrease the success rate in endodontic practice. This study assessed the prevalence of procedural errors and the quality of endodontic treatments in maxillary molars and premolars using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT scans from two private radiology centers were assessed retrospectively to ensure the same calculated sample size of 327 teeth for each of the four maxillary posterior tooth types (a total of 1,308 endodontically treated teeth). Image sets were evaluated for procedural errors categorized as follows: obturation length (overfilling or underfilling by >2 mm short of the root apex), missed canals, perforations, strip perforations (with extrusion of material into the furcation area), separated instruments in the root canal space, and root fracture. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and frequency data was assessed using the Monte Carlo test at the 0.05 level of significance. The procedural errors most commonly reported in the present study were from most frequent to least frequent: underfilled canals (50.0%), missed canals (27.5%), overfilled canals (12.5%), apical perforations (5.0%), separated instruments (3.1%), and root fractures (1.9%). No strip perforations (with extrusion of material into the furcation area) were seen in the study (0%). Underfilled and missed root canals were the most frequent procedural errors identified in the present study. These findings underline the importance of more consideration of critical working length management during all stages of root canal treatment, greater awareness of root canal anatomy, and the use of imaging and diagnostic devices that enhance the ability to identify and treat root canals both safely and effectively.