Danish Kashaev

The online matching problem was introduced by Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani (STOC 1990) on bipartite graphs with vertex arrivals. It is well-known that the optimal competitive ratio is $$1-1/e$$ 1 - 1 / e for both integral and fractional versions of the problem. Since then, there has been considerable effort to find optimal competitive ratios for other related settings. In this work, we go beyond the graph case and study the online matching problem on k -uniform hypergraphs. For $$k=3$$ k = 3 , we provide an optimal primal-dual fractional algorithm, which achieves a competitive ratio of $$(e-1)/(e+1)\approx 0.4621$$ ( e - 1 ) / ( e + 1 ) ≈ 0.4621 . As our main technical contribution, we present a carefully constructed adversarial instance, which shows that this ratio is in fact optimal. It combines ideas from known hard instances for bipartite graphs under the edge-arrival and vertex-arrival models. For $$k\ge 3$$ k ≥ 3 , we give a simple integral algorithm which performs better than greedy when the online nodes have bounded degree. As a corollary, it achieves the optimal competitive ratio of 1/2 on 3-uniform hypergraphs when every online node has degree at most 2. This is because the special case where every online node has degree 1 is equivalent to the edge-arrival model on graphs, for which an upper bound of 1/2 is known.

We study the online load balancing problem on unrelated machines, with the objective of minimizing the square of the $\ell_2$ norm of the loads on the machines. The greedy algorithm of Awerbuch et al. (STOC'95) is optimal for deterministic algorithms and achieves a competitive ratio of $3 + 2 \sqrt{2} \approx 5.828$, and an improved $5$-competitive randomized algorithm based on independent rounding has been shown by Caragiannis (SODA'08). In this work, we present the first algorithm breaking the barrier of $5$ on the competitive ratio, achieving a bound of $4.9843$. To obtain this result, we use a new primal-dual framework to analyze this problem based on a natural semidefinite programming relaxation, together with an online implementation of a correlated randomized rounding procedure of Im and Shadloo (SODA'20). This novel primal-dual framework also yields new, simple and unified proofs of the competitive ratio of the $(3 + 2 \sqrt{2})$-competitive greedy algorithm, the $5$-competitive randomized independent rounding algorithm, and that of a new $4$-competitive optimal fractional algorithm. We also provide lower bounds showing that the previous best randomized algorithm is optimal among independent rounding algorithms, that our new fractional algorithm is optimal, and that a simple greedy algorithm is optimal for the closely related online scheduling problem $R || \sum w_j C_j$.

Explorable heap selection is the problem of selecting the nth smallest value in a binary heap. The key values can only be accessed by traversing through the underlying infinite binary tree, and the complexity of the algorithm is measured by the total distance traveled in the tree (each edge has unit cost). This problem was originally proposed as a model to study search strategies for the branch-and-bound algorithm with storage restrictions by Karp, Saks and Widgerson (FOCS ’86), who gave deterministic and randomized $$n\cdot \exp (O(\sqrt{\log {n}}))$$ n · exp ( O ( log n ) ) time algorithms using $$O(\log (n)^{2.5})$$ O ( log ( n ) 2.5 ) and $$O(\sqrt{\log n})$$ O ( log n ) space respectively. We present a new randomized algorithm with running time $$O(n\log (n)^3)$$ O ( n log ( n ) 3 ) against an oblivious adversary using $$O(\log n)$$ O ( log n ) space, substantially improving the previous best randomized running time at the expense of slightly increased space usage. We also show an $$\Omega (\log (n)n/\log (\log (n)))$$ Ω ( log ( n ) n / log ( log ( n ) ) ) lower bound for any algorithm that solves the problem in the same amount of space, indicating that our algorithm is nearly optimal.

The vertex cover problem is a fundamental and widely studied combinatorial optimization problem. It is known that its standard linear programming relaxation is integral for bipartite graphs and half-integral for general graphs. As a consequence, the natural rounding algorithm based on this relaxation computes an optimal solution for bipartite graphs and a $2$-approximation for general graphs. This raises the question of whether one can interpolate the rounding curve of the standard linear programming relaxation in a beyond the worst-case manner, depending on how close the graph is to being bipartite. In this paper, we consider a simple rounding algorithm that exploits the knowledge of an induced bipartite subgraph to attain improved approximation ratios. Equivalently, we suppose that we work with a pair $(G, S)$, consisting of a graph with an odd cycle transversal. If $S$ is a stable set, we prove a tight approximation ratio of $1 + 1/\rho$, where $2\rho -1$ denotes the odd girth (i.e., length of the shortest odd cycle) of the contracted graph $\tilde{G} := G /S$ and satisfies $\rho \in [2,\infty]$. If $S$ is an arbitrary set, we prove a tight approximation ratio of $\left(1+1/\rho \right) (1 - \alpha) + 2 \alpha$, where $\alpha \in [0,1]$ is a natural parameter measuring the quality of the set $S$. The technique used to prove tight improved approximation ratios relies on a structural analysis of the contracted graph $\tilde{G}$. Tightness is shown by constructing classes of weight functions matching the obtained upper bounds. As a byproduct of the structural analysis, we obtain improved tight bounds on the integrality gap and the fractional chromatic number of 3-colorable graphs. We also discuss algorithmic applications in order to find good odd cycle transversals and show optimality of the analysis.

Contention resolution schemes (or CR schemes), introduced by Chekuri, Vondrak and Zenklusen, are a class of randomized rounding algorithms for converting a fractional solution to a relaxation for a down-closed constraint family into an integer solution. A CR scheme takes a fractional point $x$ in a relaxation polytope, rounds each coordinate $x_i$ independently to get a possibly non-feasible set, and then drops some elements in order to satisfy the constraints. Intuitively, a contention resolution scheme is $c$-balanced if every element $i$ is selected with probability at least $c \cdot x_i$. It is known that general matroids admit a $(1-1/e)$-balanced CR scheme, and that this is (asymptotically) optimal. This is in particular true for the special case of uniform matroids of rank one. In this work, we provide a simple and explicit monotone CR scheme for uniform matroids of rank $k$ on $n$ elements with a balancedness of $1 - \binom{n}{k}\:\left(1-\frac{k}{n}\right)^{n+1-k}\:\left(\frac{k}{n}\right)^k$, and show that this is optimal. As $n$ grows, this expression converges from above to $1 - e^{-k}k^k/k!$. While this asymptotic bound can be obtained by combining previously known results, these require defining an exponential-sized linear program, as well as using random sampling and the ellipsoid algorithm. Our procedure, on the other hand, has the advantage of being simple and explicit. This scheme extends naturally into an optimal CR scheme for partition matroids.