David M. Ruggiero
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
David M. Ruggiero has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Paola Costanza Miglietta
Resilient Steel Structures Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2 shared publications Ahmad Majdouba
1 shared publicationBenoit Boulanger
Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd
1 shared publication- Dario Trabucco
Department of Architecture and Arts, Iuav University of Venice, 30135 Venice, Italy
1 shared publication - Enrico Pinelli
Concrete Behaviour and Structural Design Laboratory EPFL Lausanne Switzerland
1 shared publication - Evan C. Bentz
Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Structural Concrete
Quantifying the embodied‐carbon premium of RC transfer beams via automated design
Transfer structures in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings enable architectural flexibility but often increase material use and embodied carbon. This study introduces an automated framework to quantify the embodied‐carbon premium associated with such systems. For each parametric configuration, two equivalent RC frames—one regular and one with a transfer beam—are designed through iterative finite‐element analysis, genetic‐algorithm optimization, and Eurocode‐based verification. Embodied carbon is evaluated on a cradle‐to‐gate basis using ICE v4.0 material factors. Across 3744 configurations, transfer systems consistently increased embodied carbon. At the frame level, the embodied‐carbon premium averaged 41.7% and ranged from 14.9% to 157.5%, with the highest values observed in end‐supported transfer configurations. The premium is governed primarily by geometric parameters, especially transfer span and building height, whereas material parameters have limited influence on relative impact. A transfer effort metric is proposed to predict the environmental penalty from geometric parameters alone. The results underline the need to integrate embodied‐carbon considerations into conceptual design to ensure more sustainable use of transfer structures.
- 23 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Structural Concrete
Open AccessQuantifying the embodied‐carbon premium of RC transfer beams via automated design
Transfer structures in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings enable architectural flexibility but often increase material use and embodied carbon. This study introduces an automated framework to quantify the embodied‐carbon premium associated with such systems. For each parametric configuration, two equivalent RC frames—one regular and one with a transfer beam—are designed through iterative finite‐element analysis, genetic‐algorithm optimization, and Eurocode‐based verification. Embodied carbon is evaluated on a cradle‐to‐gate basis using ICE v4.0 material factors. Across 3744 configurations, transfer systems consistently increased embodied carbon. At the frame level, the embodied‐carbon premium averaged 41.7% and ranged from 14.9% to 157.5%, with the highest values observed in end‐supported transfer configurations. The premium is governed primarily by geometric parameters, especially transfer span and building height, whereas material parameters have limited influence on relative impact. A transfer effort metric is proposed to predict the environmental penalty from geometric parameters alone. The results underline the need to integrate embodied‐carbon considerations into conceptual design to ensure more sustainable use of transfer structures.
- Open Access
- 25 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 92
Deflection-constrained topology optimization of ribbed reinforced-concrete slabs: a verification-driven density-to-design framework
- 25 August 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Structures
- Vol. 92
Open AccessDeflection-constrained topology optimization of ribbed reinforced-concrete slabs: a verification-driven density-to-design framework
- 29 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 36-44
A Design Method in Grasshopper for Efficient Material Use in Concrete Slabs
- 29 December 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 36-44
A Design Method in Grasshopper for Efficient Material Use in Concrete Slabs
- Open Access
Embodied Carbon Premium for Cantilevers
This study addresses the critical need for sustainable architectural designs within the context of climate change and the significant role the built environment plays in greenhouse gas emissions. The focus of this paper is on understanding the influence of unbalanced cantilevers on the embodied carbon of structural systems in buildings, a subject that has, until now, remained underexplored despite its importance in architectural innovation and environmental sustainability. Employing a case study approach, the Melbourne School of Design (MSD) building serves as a primary example to assess the embodied carbon implications of cantilevered versus supported structures. The methodological framework encompasses a comparative embodied carbon assessment utilising an input–output-based hybrid life cycle inventory analysis approach. The findings reveal that unbalanced cantilevers in buildings, exemplified by the MSD building, can lead to a 10% increase in embodied carbon compared to alternative designs incorporating supporting columns. Such findings underscore the environmental premium for cantilevers, prompting a re-evaluation of design practices towards minimising embodied carbon. Through this investigation, the research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable construction practices, offering valuable insights for both design practitioners and educators in the pursuit of improving the environmental performance of the built environment.
Open AccessEmbodied Carbon Premium for Cantilevers
This study addresses the critical need for sustainable architectural designs within the context of climate change and the significant role the built environment plays in greenhouse gas emissions. The focus of this paper is on understanding the influence of unbalanced cantilevers on the embodied carbon of structural systems in buildings, a subject that has, until now, remained underexplored despite its importance in architectural innovation and environmental sustainability. Employing a case study approach, the Melbourne School of Design (MSD) building serves as a primary example to assess the embodied carbon implications of cantilevered versus supported structures. The methodological framework encompasses a comparative embodied carbon assessment utilising an input–output-based hybrid life cycle inventory analysis approach. The findings reveal that unbalanced cantilevers in buildings, exemplified by the MSD building, can lead to a 10% increase in embodied carbon compared to alternative designs incorporating supporting columns. Such findings underscore the environmental premium for cantilevers, prompting a re-evaluation of design practices towards minimising embodied carbon. Through this investigation, the research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable construction practices, offering valuable insights for both design practitioners and educators in the pursuit of improving the environmental performance of the built environment.
- 13 December 2023
- Published by Wiley in Structural Concrete
- Vol. 25 (4) , 2571-2590
TheGeneral Crack Component Modelfor reversed cyclic shear
A growing body of research has shown that reversed cyclic shear loading of reinforced concrete (RC) causes effects that are not accounted for in monotonic behavioral models. Notable among these effects are a reduction in shear strength and significant plastic offsets. This paper presents the General Crack Component Model, a rational, mechanics‐based model that explicitly considers the constitutive behavior of cracks in RC. Cracked RC is treated as a series–parallel system of bonded and unbonded regions, where the crack interfaces have both crack closing hysteresis and a kinematic contact constraint. Validation was performed using data from monotonic and reversed cyclic experiments on panel elements, and has shown that this analytical model is able to accurately capture the salient features of reversed cyclic shear behavior.
- 13 December 2023
- Published by Wiley in Structural Concrete
- Vol. 25 (4) , 2571-2590
TheGeneral Crack Component Modelfor reversed cyclic shear
A growing body of research has shown that reversed cyclic shear loading of reinforced concrete (RC) causes effects that are not accounted for in monotonic behavioral models. Notable among these effects are a reduction in shear strength and significant plastic offsets. This paper presents the General Crack Component Model, a rational, mechanics‐based model that explicitly considers the constitutive behavior of cracks in RC. Cracked RC is treated as a series–parallel system of bonded and unbonded regions, where the crack interfaces have both crack closing hysteresis and a kinematic contact constraint. Validation was performed using data from monotonic and reversed cyclic experiments on panel elements, and has shown that this analytical model is able to accurately capture the salient features of reversed cyclic shear behavior.
- 3 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1018-1027
A Simple, Closed-Form Method for Determining the Superelevation of Tall Reinforced Concrete Buildings
- 3 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1018-1027
A Simple, Closed-Form Method for Determining the Superelevation of Tall Reinforced Concrete Buildings