Sabrina Nicole Grondhuis
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Sabrina Nicole Grondhuis has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
James A. Mulick
1 shared publicationM. G. Aman
The Nisonger Center The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA
1 shared publication- Michael G. Aman
The Ohio State University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 5 November 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
- Vol. 29 (2) , 241-263
Risk Factors for Overweight in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- 5 November 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
- Vol. 29 (2) , 241-263
Risk Factors for Overweight in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- 10 September 2013
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Vol. 58 (9) , 787-799
Overweight and obesity in youth with developmental disabilities: a call to action
Elevated weight status has become a leading problem for adults and children around the world, regardless of the presence or lack of disability. Youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities are more vulnerable than the typical population to overweight in recent decades, and these individuals often experience overweight and obesity at higher rates than their typically developing peers. Young people with disabilities have many circumstances, beyond those of typically developing children, which increase their risk for greater body mass. These include greater medication use, having syndromes with obesity as an associated symptom, and possessing altered eating habits related to their disability. We discuss obesity‐related health risks, possible weight management options, recommendations for weight maintenance or loss, and future research. Although most professionals who work with youth having developmental disabilities do not have great expertise in nutrition and weight management, we must collectively recognise the importance of weight issues for quality of life of these individuals and work with them in maintaining healthy lifestyles. Intervention options, both for caregivers and for health professionals, are discussed.
- 10 September 2013
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Vol. 58 (9) , 787-799
Overweight and obesity in youth with developmental disabilities: a call to action
Elevated weight status has become a leading problem for adults and children around the world, regardless of the presence or lack of disability. Youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities are more vulnerable than the typical population to overweight in recent decades, and these individuals often experience overweight and obesity at higher rates than their typically developing peers. Young people with disabilities have many circumstances, beyond those of typically developing children, which increase their risk for greater body mass. These include greater medication use, having syndromes with obesity as an associated symptom, and possessing altered eating habits related to their disability. We discuss obesity‐related health risks, possible weight management options, recommendations for weight maintenance or loss, and future research. Although most professionals who work with youth having developmental disabilities do not have great expertise in nutrition and weight management, we must collectively recognise the importance of weight issues for quality of life of these individuals and work with them in maintaining healthy lifestyles. Intervention options, both for caregivers and for health professionals, are discussed.
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Vol. 118 (1) , 44-54
Comparison of the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
A review of hospital records was conducted for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorders who completed both the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised (Leiter-R) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition (SB5). Participants were between 3 and 12 years of age. Diagnoses were autistic disorder (n = 26, 55%) and pervasive developmental disorder–not otherwise specified (n = 21, 45%). Analysis showed that the full sample received significantly higher scores on the Leiter-R than SB5 (mean discrepancy of 20.91 points), specific diagnosis was not a significant factor, and younger children had a larger discrepancy between tests. These analyses strongly suggest that the Leiter-R and the SB5 may not be equivalent measures of intellectual functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders, and that use of one or the other exclusively could lead to misclassification of intellectual capacity.
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Vol. 118 (1) , 44-54
Comparison of the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
A review of hospital records was conducted for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorders who completed both the Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised (Leiter-R) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition (SB5). Participants were between 3 and 12 years of age. Diagnoses were autistic disorder (n = 26, 55%) and pervasive developmental disorder–not otherwise specified (n = 21, 45%). Analysis showed that the full sample received significantly higher scores on the Leiter-R than SB5 (mean discrepancy of 20.91 points), specific diagnosis was not a significant factor, and younger children had a larger discrepancy between tests. These analyses strongly suggest that the Leiter-R and the SB5 may not be equivalent measures of intellectual functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders, and that use of one or the other exclusively could lead to misclassification of intellectual capacity.