Chang-Lin Yeh

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Materials and Methods: 20 women with SUI were delivered a treatment course with HIFEM technology. Patients attended 6 therapies scheduled twice a week. Validated questionnaires were assessed, including the overactive bladder symptoms score (OABSS), urogenital distress inventory-6 (UDI-6), incontinence impact questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), international consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ), and valued living questionnaire (VLQ). Some urodynamic parameters, such as maximum flow rate (Qmax), residual urine (RU), and bladder volume at first sensation to void (Vfst). Bladder neck mobility in ultrasound topography was also collected pre- and post-treatment at 1- and 6-month follow-up visits. Results: HIFEM treatment significantly improved SUI symptoms on pad tests from 4.2 ± 5.5 to 0.6 ± 1.3 and patients’ self-assessment in the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, the data from urinary-related questionnaires, including OABSS (5.3 ± 3.9 to 3.9 ± 3.6), UDI-6 (35.7 ± 22.3 to 15.2 ± 10.6), IIQ-7 (33.1 ± 28.7 to 14.3 ± 17.2), and ICIQ (9.4 ± 5.0 to 5.4 ± 3.6), all showed a significant reduction. Then, the analysis of the urodynamic study revealed that only maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) (46.4 ± 25.2 to 58.1 ± 21.2) and urethral closure angle (UCA) (705.3 ± 302.3 to 990.0 ± 439.6) significantly increased after the six sessions of HIFEM treatment. The urethral and vaginal topography were performed and found that HIFEM mainly worked on pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and enhanced their function and integrity. Conclusions: The results suggest that HIFEM technology is an efficacious therapy for the treatment of SUI.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the overall rest–stress distance measured by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and Q-tip test angle in women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), and determine a cut-off value of rest–stress distance for predicting urethral hypermobility (UH). Methods: Women with USI scheduled for mid-urethral sling surgery were retrospectively recruited. UH was defined as a Q-tip angle more than or equal to 30 degrees. Ultrasonic measurement of the overall rest–stress distance was defined as the linear distance of bladder-neck position change from resting status to maximal strain. Results: Among the 132 enrolled women, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the overall rest–stress distance in TPUS and Q-tip test angle was 0.9104 (95% CI, 0.8758–0.9357, p < 0.001). In receiver-operating-characteristic-curve analysis, a rest–stress distance of more than 13.3 mm was an optimal cut-off value to predict UH (sensitivity = 76.47%, specificity = 93.3%; area = 0.937, 95% confidence interval: 0.881–0.972). Conclusions: The overall rest–stress distance in TPUS correlated well with the Q-tip test angle, indicating that it can be an alternative method for the assessment of USI. A rest–stress distance of more than 13.3 mm was an optimal cut-off value to predict UH in women with USI.

Background: To report our experiences of a tape-releasing suture with “long-loop” in women with iatrogenic urethral obstruction following the mid-urethral sling procedure. Methods: A total of 149 women underwent a tape-releasing suture with “Long Loop” during the operation. Post-void residual volume was evaluated after Foley removal. Lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic studies were assessed before and six months postoperatively. Results: Nine women out of 149 who underwent mid-urethral sling surgery were found to have iatrogenic urethral obstruction post-operatively based on their urinary symptoms and ultrasound findings. There was no apparent difference between tested groups in mid-urethral sling products and concomitant procedures. 77.8% had successful releases after the first Long-loop manipulation procedure, and 22.2% required two or more releases. However, the SUI cure rate is similar in groups receiving the Long-loop manipulation or not (88.9% and 87.1%, respectively). Conclusions: We are convinced of the practicability and efficacy of the tape-releasing suture “Long-loop.” We adopted subjective and objective means to evaluate both groups before and after a six-month follow-up. The Long-loop manipulation procedure can successfully resolve the iatrogenic urethral obstruction without compromising the effectiveness of mid-urethral sling for the treatment of SUI.