Patrick Micke
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Patrick Micke has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Arne Östman
Karolinska Institute, Cancer Center Karolinska, Department of Pathology-Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden
1 shared publication- Bengt Glimelius
Uppsala University
1 shared publication - Helgi Birgisson
Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared publication - Johan Botling
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
1 shared publication - Karolina Edlund
Molecular Pathology Unit, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared publication - Magnus Sundström
Molecular Pathology Unit, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 December 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 10 (1) , 660
KRAS analysis in colorectal carcinoma: Analytical aspects of Pyrosequencing and allele-specific PCR in clinical practice
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy is now approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinomas (CRC) in patients with tumors lacking KRAS mutations. Several procedures to detect KRAS mutations have been developed. However, the analytical sensitivity and specificity of these assays on routine clinical samples are not yet fully characterised. Methods: The practical aspects and clinical applicability of a KRAS-assay based on Pyrosequencing were evaluated in a series of 314 consecutive CRC cases submitted for diagnostic KRAS analysis. The performance of Pyrosequencing compared to allele-specific, real-time PCR was then explored by a direct comparison of CE-IVD-marked versions of Pyrosequencing and TheraScreen (DxS) KRAS assays for a consecutive subset (n = 100) of the 314 clinical CRC samples. Results: Using Pyrosequencing, 39% of the 314 CRC samples were found KRAS-mutated and several of the mutations (8%) were located in codon 61. To explore the analytical sensitivity of the Pyrosequencing assay, mutated patient DNA was serially diluted with wild-type patient DNA. Dilutions corresponding to 1.25-2.5% tumor cells still revealed detectable mutation signals. In clinical practice, our algorithm for KRAS analysis includes a reanalysis of samples with low tumor cell content (< 10%, n = 56) using an independent assay (allele-specific PCR, DxS). All mutations identified by Pyrosequencing were then confirmed and, in addition, one more mutated sample was identified in this subset of 56 samples. Finally, a direct comparison of the two technologies was done by re-analysis of a subset (n = 100) of the clinical samples using CE-IVD-marked versions of Pyrosequencing and TheraScreen KRAS assays in a single blinded fashion. The number of samples for which the KRAS codon 12/13 mutation status could be defined using the Pyrosequencing or the TheraScreen assay was 94 and 91, respectively, and both assays detected the same number of codon 12 and 13 mutations. Conclusions: KRAS mutation detection using Pyrosequencing was evaluated on a consecutive set of clinical CRC samples. Pyrosequencing provided sufficient analytical sensitivity and specificity to assess the mutation status in routine formalin-fixed CRC samples, even in tissues with a low tumor cell content.
- 1 December 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 10 (1) , 660
Open AccessKRAS analysis in colorectal carcinoma: Analytical aspects of Pyrosequencing and allele-specific PCR in clinical practice
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy is now approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinomas (CRC) in patients with tumors lacking KRAS mutations. Several procedures to detect KRAS mutations have been developed. However, the analytical sensitivity and specificity of these assays on routine clinical samples are not yet fully characterised. Methods: The practical aspects and clinical applicability of a KRAS-assay based on Pyrosequencing were evaluated in a series of 314 consecutive CRC cases submitted for diagnostic KRAS analysis. The performance of Pyrosequencing compared to allele-specific, real-time PCR was then explored by a direct comparison of CE-IVD-marked versions of Pyrosequencing and TheraScreen (DxS) KRAS assays for a consecutive subset (n = 100) of the 314 clinical CRC samples. Results: Using Pyrosequencing, 39% of the 314 CRC samples were found KRAS-mutated and several of the mutations (8%) were located in codon 61. To explore the analytical sensitivity of the Pyrosequencing assay, mutated patient DNA was serially diluted with wild-type patient DNA. Dilutions corresponding to 1.25-2.5% tumor cells still revealed detectable mutation signals. In clinical practice, our algorithm for KRAS analysis includes a reanalysis of samples with low tumor cell content (< 10%, n = 56) using an independent assay (allele-specific PCR, DxS). All mutations identified by Pyrosequencing were then confirmed and, in addition, one more mutated sample was identified in this subset of 56 samples. Finally, a direct comparison of the two technologies was done by re-analysis of a subset (n = 100) of the clinical samples using CE-IVD-marked versions of Pyrosequencing and TheraScreen KRAS assays in a single blinded fashion. The number of samples for which the KRAS codon 12/13 mutation status could be defined using the Pyrosequencing or the TheraScreen assay was 94 and 91, respectively, and both assays detected the same number of codon 12 and 13 mutations. Conclusions: KRAS mutation detection using Pyrosequencing was evaluated on a consecutive set of clinical CRC samples. Pyrosequencing provided sufficient analytical sensitivity and specificity to assess the mutation status in routine formalin-fixed CRC samples, even in tissues with a low tumor cell content.
- 21 November 2005
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
- Vol. 9 (6) , 1217-1233
Exploring the tumour environment: cancer-associated fibroblasts as targets in cancer therapy
Stroma cells contribute to the microenvironment that is essential for cancer growth, invasion and metastatic progression. Fibroblasts, often termed myofibroblasts or cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), represent the most abundant cell type in the tumour stroma. The demonstrated tumour-promoting capacities of CAFs has increased the interest to exploit them as drug targets for anticancer therapy. Although single factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-β1, hepatocyte growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases have been identified as mediators in the fibroblast tumour interaction, the morphological and functional differences of CAFs compared with their normal counterparts are only incompletely understood. Recently, novel global methods for gene expression profiling were applied to comprehensively characterise CAFs from breast, pancreas, colon and basal cell cancer in their in situ environment. The analysis of different CAF preparations revealed regulated genes that were ...
- 21 November 2005
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
- Vol. 9 (6) , 1217-1233
Exploring the tumour environment: cancer-associated fibroblasts as targets in cancer therapy
Stroma cells contribute to the microenvironment that is essential for cancer growth, invasion and metastatic progression. Fibroblasts, often termed myofibroblasts or cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), represent the most abundant cell type in the tumour stroma. The demonstrated tumour-promoting capacities of CAFs has increased the interest to exploit them as drug targets for anticancer therapy. Although single factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-β1, hepatocyte growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases have been identified as mediators in the fibroblast tumour interaction, the morphological and functional differences of CAFs compared with their normal counterparts are only incompletely understood. Recently, novel global methods for gene expression profiling were applied to comprehensively characterise CAFs from breast, pancreas, colon and basal cell cancer in their in situ environment. The analysis of different CAF preparations revealed regulated genes that were ...