David E. M. Sappington
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
David E. M. Sappington has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Dennis L. Weisman
Department of Economics, Kansa., State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
1 shared publicationTracy R. Lewis
Department of Economics, P.O. Box 117140, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
1 shared publication- Tracy R. Lewis
University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 September 1999
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 8 (3) , 351-382
Using Subjective Risk Adjusting to Prevent Patient Dumping in the Health Care Industry
We examine how to procure health care services at minimum cost while preventing suppliers from refusing to care for high‐cost patients. A single risk‐adjusted prospective payment is optimal only when it is particularly costly for the supplier to discover likely treatment costs. Cost sharing is optimal when these screening costs are somewhat smaller. When screening costs are sufficiently small, screening is optimally accommodated and subjective risk adjusting is implemented. Under subjective risk adjusting, the supplier classifies patients according to his personal assessment of likely treatment costs, and payments are structured accordingly. Optimal procurement policies are contrasted with prevailing industry policies.
- 1 September 1999
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 8 (3) , 351-382
Using Subjective Risk Adjusting to Prevent Patient Dumping in the Health Care Industry
We examine how to procure health care services at minimum cost while preventing suppliers from refusing to care for high‐cost patients. A single risk‐adjusted prospective payment is optimal only when it is particularly costly for the supplier to discover likely treatment costs. Cost sharing is optimal when these screening costs are somewhat smaller. When screening costs are sufficiently small, screening is optimally accommodated and subjective risk adjusting is implemented. Under subjective risk adjusting, the supplier classifies patients according to his personal assessment of likely treatment costs, and payments are structured accordingly. Optimal procurement policies are contrasted with prevailing industry policies.
- 1 March 1999
- Published by Elsevier in Information Economics and Policy
- Vol. 11 (1) , 73-100
Access pricing with unregulated downstream competition
- 1 March 1999
- Published by Elsevier in Information Economics and Policy
- Vol. 11 (1) , 73-100
Access pricing with unregulated downstream competition
- 30 June 1996
- Published by Elsevier in Information Economics and Policy
- Vol. 8 (2) , 125-140
Potential pitfalls in empirical investigations of the effects of incentive regulation plans in the telecommunications industry
- 30 June 1996
- Published by Elsevier in Information Economics and Policy
- Vol. 8 (2) , 125-140
Potential pitfalls in empirical investigations of the effects of incentive regulation plans in the telecommunications industry