Stephen M. White
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Stephen M. White has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
A. G. Ling
Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc
1 shared publicationC. S. Lin
Air Force Research Laboratory; Space Vehicles Directorate; Hanscom Air Force Base Massachusetts USA
1 shared publicationC.S. Lin
Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL/RVBXP, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, USA
1 shared publication- Edward E. DeLuca
Center for Astrophysics—Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
1 shared publication F. J. Rich
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory; Lexington Massachusetts USA
1 shared publication- G. R. Wilson
Air Force Research Laboratory; Space Vehicles Directorate; Hanscom Air Force Base Massachusetts USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 24 February 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 176 (1-4) , 3-19
Solar Drivers of 11-yr and Long-Term Cosmic Ray Modulation
- 24 February 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 176 (1-4) , 3-19
Solar Drivers of 11-yr and Long-Term Cosmic Ray Modulation
- 26 January 2011
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 116 (A1)
EstimatingDstindices and exospheric temperatures from equatorial magnetic fields measured by DMSP satellites
- 26 January 2011
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 116 (A1)
EstimatingDstindices and exospheric temperatures from equatorial magnetic fields measured by DMSP satellites
- 31 December 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 269 (1) , 111-127
An Analysis of the Sunspot Groups and Flares of Solar Cycle 23
- 31 December 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 269 (1) , 111-127
An Analysis of the Sunspot Groups and Flares of Solar Cycle 23
- 26 August 2010
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 6 (S273) , 487-490
Microwave Depolarization above Sunspots
Microwave emissions from sunspots are circularly polarized in the sense of rotation (right or left) determined by the polarity (north or south) of coronal magnetic fields. However, they may convert into unpolarized emissions under certain conditions of magnetic field and electron density in the corona, and this phenomenon of depolarization could be used to derive those parameters. We propose another diagnostic use of microwave depolarization based on the fact that an observed depolarization strip actually represents the coronal magnetic polarity inversion line (PIL) at the heights of effective mode coupling, and its location itself carries information on the distribution of magnetic polarity in the corona. To demonstrate this diagnostic utility we generate a set of magnetic field models for a complex active region with the observed line-of-sight magnetic fields but varying current density distribution and compare them with the 4.9 GHz polarization map obtained with the Very Large Array (VLA). The field extrapolation predicts very different locations of the depolarization strip in the corona depending on the amount of electric currents assumed to exist in the photosphere. Such high sensitivity of microwave depolarization to the coronal magnetic field can therefore be useful for validating electric current density maps inferred from vector magnetic fields observed in the photosphere.
- 26 August 2010
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 6 (S273) , 487-490
Microwave Depolarization above Sunspots
Microwave emissions from sunspots are circularly polarized in the sense of rotation (right or left) determined by the polarity (north or south) of coronal magnetic fields. However, they may convert into unpolarized emissions under certain conditions of magnetic field and electron density in the corona, and this phenomenon of depolarization could be used to derive those parameters. We propose another diagnostic use of microwave depolarization based on the fact that an observed depolarization strip actually represents the coronal magnetic polarity inversion line (PIL) at the heights of effective mode coupling, and its location itself carries information on the distribution of magnetic polarity in the corona. To demonstrate this diagnostic utility we generate a set of magnetic field models for a complex active region with the observed line-of-sight magnetic fields but varying current density distribution and compare them with the 4.9 GHz polarization map obtained with the Very Large Array (VLA). The field extrapolation predicts very different locations of the depolarization strip in the corona depending on the amount of electric currents assumed to exist in the photosphere. Such high sensitivity of microwave depolarization to the coronal magnetic field can therefore be useful for validating electric current density maps inferred from vector magnetic fields observed in the photosphere.
- 26 August 2010
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 6 (S273) , 408-411
Chromosphere above sunspots as seen at millimeter wavelengths
Millimeter emission is known to be a sensitive diagnostic of temperature and density in the solar chromosphere. In this work we use millimeter wave data to distinguish between various atmospheric models of sunspots, whose temperature structure in the upper photosphere and chromosphere has been the source of some controversy. From mm brightness simulations we expect a radio umbra to change its appearance from dark to bright (compared to the Quiet Sun) at a given wavelength in the millimeter spectrum (depending on the exact temperature in the model used). Thereby the millimeter brightness observed above an umbra at several wavelengths imposes strong constraints on temperature and density stratification of the sunspot atmosphere, in particular on the location and depth of the temperature minimum and the location of the transition region. Current mm/submm observational data suggest that brightness observed at short wavelengths is unexpectedly low compared to the most widely used sunspot models such as of Maltby et al. (1986). A successful model that is in agreement with millimeter umbral brightness should have an extended and deep temperature minimum (below 3000 K), such as in the models of Severino et al. (1994). However, we are not able to resolve the umbra cleanly with the presently available observations and better resolution as well as better wavelength coverage are needed for accurate diagnostics of umbral brightness at millimeter wavelengths. This adds one more scientific objective for the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).
- 26 August 2010
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 6 (S273) , 408-411
Chromosphere above sunspots as seen at millimeter wavelengths
Millimeter emission is known to be a sensitive diagnostic of temperature and density in the solar chromosphere. In this work we use millimeter wave data to distinguish between various atmospheric models of sunspots, whose temperature structure in the upper photosphere and chromosphere has been the source of some controversy. From mm brightness simulations we expect a radio umbra to change its appearance from dark to bright (compared to the Quiet Sun) at a given wavelength in the millimeter spectrum (depending on the exact temperature in the model used). Thereby the millimeter brightness observed above an umbra at several wavelengths imposes strong constraints on temperature and density stratification of the sunspot atmosphere, in particular on the location and depth of the temperature minimum and the location of the transition region. Current mm/submm observational data suggest that brightness observed at short wavelengths is unexpectedly low compared to the most widely used sunspot models such as of Maltby et al. (1986). A successful model that is in agreement with millimeter umbral brightness should have an extended and deep temperature minimum (below 3000 K), such as in the models of Severino et al. (1994). However, we are not able to resolve the umbra cleanly with the presently available observations and better resolution as well as better wavelength coverage are needed for accurate diagnostics of umbral brightness at millimeter wavelengths. This adds one more scientific objective for the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).
- 13 February 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 262 (1) , 135-147
TRACE Observations of Changes in Coronal Hole Boundaries
- 13 February 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Solar Physics
- Vol. 262 (1) , 135-147
TRACE Observations of Changes in Coronal Hole Boundaries
- 11 October 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
- Vol. 71 (16) , 1614-1622
Two observed consequences of penetration electric fields
- 11 October 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
- Vol. 71 (16) , 1614-1622
Two observed consequences of penetration electric fields
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 4 (S257) , 401-412
History of research on solar energetic particle (SEP) events: the evolving paradigm
Forbush initiated research on solar energetic particle (SEP) events in 1946 when he reported ionization chamber observations of the first three ground level events (GLEs). The next key development was the neutron monitor observation of the GLE of 23 February 1956. Meyer, Parker and Simpson attributed this high-energy SEP event to a short time-scale process associated with a solar flare and ascribed the much longer duration of the particle event to scattering in the interplanetary medium. Thus “flare particle” acceleration became the initial paradigm for SEP acceleration at the Sun. A more fully-developed picture was presented by the Australian radio astronomers Wild, Smerd, and Weiss in 1963. They identified two distinct SEP acceleration processes in flares: (1) the first phase accelerated primarily ~100 keV electrons that gave rise to fast-drift type III emission as they streamed outward through the solar atmosphere; (2) the second phase was produced by an outward moving (~1000 km s−1) magnetohydrodynamic shock, occurring in certain (generally larger) flares. The second phase, manifested by slow-drift metric type II emission, appeared to be required for substantial acceleration of protons and higher-energy electrons. This two-stage (or two-class) picture gained acceptance during the 1980s as composition and charge state measurements strengthened the evidence for two distinct types of particle events which were termed impulsive (attributed to flare-resident acceleration process(es)) and gradual (shock-associated). Reames championed the two-class picture and it is the commonly accepted paradigm today. A key error made in the establishment of this paradigm was revealed in the late 1990s by observations of SEP composition and charge states at higher energies (>10 MeV) than previously available. Specifically, some large and therefore presumably “gradual” SEP events looked “impulsive” at these energies. One group of researchers attributes these unusual events to acceleration of high-energy SEPs by flares and another school favors acceleration of flare seed particles by quasi-perpendicular shocks. A revised SEP classification scheme is proposed to accommodate the new observations and to include ideas on geometry and seed particle composition recently incorporated into models of shock acceleration of SEPs.
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
- Vol. 4 (S257) , 401-412
History of research on solar energetic particle (SEP) events: the evolving paradigm
Forbush initiated research on solar energetic particle (SEP) events in 1946 when he reported ionization chamber observations of the first three ground level events (GLEs). The next key development was the neutron monitor observation of the GLE of 23 February 1956. Meyer, Parker and Simpson attributed this high-energy SEP event to a short time-scale process associated with a solar flare and ascribed the much longer duration of the particle event to scattering in the interplanetary medium. Thus “flare particle” acceleration became the initial paradigm for SEP acceleration at the Sun. A more fully-developed picture was presented by the Australian radio astronomers Wild, Smerd, and Weiss in 1963. They identified two distinct SEP acceleration processes in flares: (1) the first phase accelerated primarily ~100 keV electrons that gave rise to fast-drift type III emission as they streamed outward through the solar atmosphere; (2) the second phase was produced by an outward moving (~1000 km s−1) magnetohydrodynamic shock, occurring in certain (generally larger) flares. The second phase, manifested by slow-drift metric type II emission, appeared to be required for substantial acceleration of protons and higher-energy electrons. This two-stage (or two-class) picture gained acceptance during the 1980s as composition and charge state measurements strengthened the evidence for two distinct types of particle events which were termed impulsive (attributed to flare-resident acceleration process(es)) and gradual (shock-associated). Reames championed the two-class picture and it is the commonly accepted paradigm today. A key error made in the establishment of this paradigm was revealed in the late 1990s by observations of SEP composition and charge states at higher energies (>10 MeV) than previously available. Specifically, some large and therefore presumably “gradual” SEP events looked “impulsive” at these energies. One group of researchers attributes these unusual events to acceleration of high-energy SEPs by flares and another school favors acceleration of flare seed particles by quasi-perpendicular shocks. A revised SEP classification scheme is proposed to accommodate the new observations and to include ideas on geometry and seed particle composition recently incorporated into models of shock acceleration of SEPs.