Connor Arquette
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Connor Arquette has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alice Mao
Fellow, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
1 shared publication Anthony Sawyer
Fourth-Year Resident, Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine
1 shared publicationAntonette Ajayi
Fellow, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine
1 shared publication- Ashraf A. Bs Patel
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
1 shared publication - Ayushi Sharma
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
1 shared publication - Baraka D. Floyd
Stanford School of Medicine
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 3 November 2023
- Published by Association of American Medical Colleges in MedEdPORTAL
- Vol. 19, 11357
Moral Injury: How It Affects Us and Tools to Combat It
Moral injury comprises feelings of guilt, despair, shame, and/or helplessness from having one's morals transgressed. Those underrepresented in health care are more likely to experience moral injury arising from micro- and macroaggressions. This workshop was designed for interprofessional health care providers ranging from students to program leadership to raise awareness about moral injury and provide tools to combat it. This 75-minute interactive workshop explored moral injury through a health care lens. It included components of lecture, case-based learning, small-group discussion, and individual reflection. Participants completed anonymous postworkshop evaluations, providing data on satisfaction and intention to change practice. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the quantitative data and applied content analysis to the qualitative data. The workshop was presented at two local academic conferences. Data were collected from 34 out of 60 participants, for a response rate of 57%. Ninety-seven percent of participants felt the workshop helped them define and identify moral injury and was a valuable use of their time, as well as indicating they would apply the information learned in their daily life. One hundred percent would recommend the workshop to a friend or colleague. Almost half felt they could implement strategies to address moral injury after participating in the workshop. This workshop proved to be a valuable tool to define and discuss moral injury. The materials can be adapted to a broad audience.
- 3 November 2023
- Published by Association of American Medical Colleges in MedEdPORTAL
- Vol. 19, 11357
Open AccessMoral Injury: How It Affects Us and Tools to Combat It
Moral injury comprises feelings of guilt, despair, shame, and/or helplessness from having one's morals transgressed. Those underrepresented in health care are more likely to experience moral injury arising from micro- and macroaggressions. This workshop was designed for interprofessional health care providers ranging from students to program leadership to raise awareness about moral injury and provide tools to combat it. This 75-minute interactive workshop explored moral injury through a health care lens. It included components of lecture, case-based learning, small-group discussion, and individual reflection. Participants completed anonymous postworkshop evaluations, providing data on satisfaction and intention to change practice. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the quantitative data and applied content analysis to the qualitative data. The workshop was presented at two local academic conferences. Data were collected from 34 out of 60 participants, for a response rate of 57%. Ninety-seven percent of participants felt the workshop helped them define and identify moral injury and was a valuable use of their time, as well as indicating they would apply the information learned in their daily life. One hundred percent would recommend the workshop to a friend or colleague. Almost half felt they could implement strategies to address moral injury after participating in the workshop. This workshop proved to be a valuable tool to define and discuss moral injury. The materials can be adapted to a broad audience.
- 10 June 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Vol. 84, 273-275
T-Line mesh as a safe and effective option for abdominal wall reinforcement with autologous breast reconstruction
- 10 June 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Vol. 84, 273-275
T-Line mesh as a safe and effective option for abdominal wall reinforcement with autologous breast reconstruction
- 1 May 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 86 (5S) , S403-S408
Comparing Outcomes of Flap-Based Salvage Reconstructions in the Radiated Breast
Introduction Chest wall irradiation significantly decreases the strength and quality of breast tissue supporting prostheses, increasing the risk of skin breakdown and implant or tissue expander extrusion. Autologous tissue, including the latissimus dorsi (LD) or abdominal-based flaps, including the muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, may be used to salvage reconstructions. However, data comparing outcomes of the two flap options remains limited. We compare postoperative outcomes from both flap types after autologous salvage reconstruction in irradiated breasts. Methods Charts were retrospectively reviewed from patients who underwent either chest wall radiation or postmastectomy radiation therapy followed by salvage autologous reconstruction with either a LD and an implant or an abdominal-based flap (muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps). Patients with a history of tissue expander or implant failure requiring autologous salvage as part of 2-staged or delayed-immediate breast reconstruction that were operated on between January 2005 and November 2015 were included. Basic demographics, comorbidities, and recipient site complications (infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, and flap failure) were collected. Results A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria which included 72 flaps; 35 LD and 37 abdominally based flaps. Demographics and comorbidities did not vary significantly between patient groups. Mean follow-up was 767.6 weeks, and all reconstructions were unilateral. Nineteen (26.4%) patients had at least one complication, most commonly minor infections (9.7%). Overall complication rates were not significantly different between flap groups (P = 0.083). Wound dehiscence was significantly higher in the abdominal group (P = 0.045), and fat necrosis also trended higher in this group (P = 0.085). Major infection trended higher in the latissimus group (P = 0.069). Conclusions When comparing outcomes of salvage flap-based reconstruction in radiated breast tissue, overall complication rates were similar when comparing postoperative outcomes between the LD- and abdominal-based flaps. Wound dehiscence was significantly higher when salvage reconstruction used an abdominal flap. Understanding the complications after salvage procedures can help inform decision making and optimize patient care to improve outcomes after breast reconstruction in the radiated breast.
- 1 May 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 86 (5S) , S403-S408
Comparing Outcomes of Flap-Based Salvage Reconstructions in the Radiated Breast
Introduction Chest wall irradiation significantly decreases the strength and quality of breast tissue supporting prostheses, increasing the risk of skin breakdown and implant or tissue expander extrusion. Autologous tissue, including the latissimus dorsi (LD) or abdominal-based flaps, including the muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, may be used to salvage reconstructions. However, data comparing outcomes of the two flap options remains limited. We compare postoperative outcomes from both flap types after autologous salvage reconstruction in irradiated breasts. Methods Charts were retrospectively reviewed from patients who underwent either chest wall radiation or postmastectomy radiation therapy followed by salvage autologous reconstruction with either a LD and an implant or an abdominal-based flap (muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous or deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps). Patients with a history of tissue expander or implant failure requiring autologous salvage as part of 2-staged or delayed-immediate breast reconstruction that were operated on between January 2005 and November 2015 were included. Basic demographics, comorbidities, and recipient site complications (infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, and flap failure) were collected. Results A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria which included 72 flaps; 35 LD and 37 abdominally based flaps. Demographics and comorbidities did not vary significantly between patient groups. Mean follow-up was 767.6 weeks, and all reconstructions were unilateral. Nineteen (26.4%) patients had at least one complication, most commonly minor infections (9.7%). Overall complication rates were not significantly different between flap groups (P = 0.083). Wound dehiscence was significantly higher in the abdominal group (P = 0.045), and fat necrosis also trended higher in this group (P = 0.085). Major infection trended higher in the latissimus group (P = 0.069). Conclusions When comparing outcomes of salvage flap-based reconstruction in radiated breast tissue, overall complication rates were similar when comparing postoperative outcomes between the LD- and abdominal-based flaps. Wound dehiscence was significantly higher when salvage reconstruction used an abdominal flap. Understanding the complications after salvage procedures can help inform decision making and optimize patient care to improve outcomes after breast reconstruction in the radiated breast.
- Open Access
- 9 February 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
- Vol. 9 (2S) , 14
25. Improving Resident Education through Directed Feedback
- 9 February 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
- Vol. 9 (2S) , 14
Open Access25. Improving Resident Education through Directed Feedback