Roman V. Deev
Research Subjects
Roman V. Deev has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yulii V. Shidlovskii
Department of Biology and General Genetics, Federal State Autonomous Educational Instution of Higher Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St., 8/2, 119048 Moscow, Russia
2 shared publications - Anna V. Tvorogova
Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia
1 shared publication - Artemiy T. Tokarev
Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
1 shared publication - Dmitry Melchenko
Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow 119435, Russia
1 shared publication - Elena V. Savvateeva-Popova
Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
1 shared publication - Elena V. Tokmatcheva
Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 188680 St. Petersburg, Russia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 12 March 2025
- Published by Media Sphere Publishing Group in Regenerative biotechnologies, preventive, digital and predictive medicine
- Vol. 2 (1)
Artificial intelligence-based software for digital assessment of reparative bone tissue regeneration
Objective. To develop artificial intelligence-based software algorithm for quantitative assessment of reparative bone tissue regeneration, as well as to compare the results of histomorphometric analysis carried out by neural network and human. Material and methods. Morphometric parameters were determined and standardized. The authors developed artificial intelligence-based software algorithm with subsequent neural network training based on high-resolution images. Efficacy of human and software algorithm was compared. Results. Original software allows for automatic analysis of bone regenerate tissue composition within the shortest possible time. Conclusion. Original software may be equivalent for quick and effective analysis of bone regenerate tissue components. These data may be comparable with manual marking regarding reproducibility and accuracy.
- 12 March 2025
- Published by Media Sphere Publishing Group in Regenerative biotechnologies, preventive, digital and predictive medicine
- Vol. 2 (1)
Artificial intelligence-based software for digital assessment of reparative bone tissue regeneration
Objective. To develop artificial intelligence-based software algorithm for quantitative assessment of reparative bone tissue regeneration, as well as to compare the results of histomorphometric analysis carried out by neural network and human. Material and methods. Morphometric parameters were determined and standardized. The authors developed artificial intelligence-based software algorithm with subsequent neural network training based on high-resolution images. Efficacy of human and software algorithm was compared. Results. Original software allows for automatic analysis of bone regenerate tissue composition within the shortest possible time. Conclusion. Original software may be equivalent for quick and effective analysis of bone regenerate tissue components. These data may be comparable with manual marking regarding reproducibility and accuracy.
- 13 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Molecular Neurobiology
- Vol. 62 (2) , 1536-1557
SWI/SNF Complex Connects Signaling and Epigenetic State in Cells of Nervous System
SWI/SNF protein complexes are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic regulators described in all eukaryotes. In metameric animals, the complexes are involved in all processes occurring in the nervous system, from neurogenesis to higher brain functions. On the one hand, the range of roles is wide because the SWI/SNF complexes act universally by mobilizing the nucleosomes in a chromatin template at multiple loci throughout the genome. On the other hand, the complexes mediate the action of multiple signaling pathways that control most aspects of neural tissue development and function. The issues are discussed to provide insight into the molecular basis of the multifaceted role of SWI/SNFs in cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, activation of immediate-early genes, neurogenesis, and brain and connectome formation. An overview is additionally provided for the molecular basis of nervous system pathologies associated with the SWI/SNF complexes and their contribution to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Finally, we discuss the idea that SWI/SNFs act as an integration platform to connect multiple signaling and genetic programs. Graphical Abstract
- 13 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Molecular Neurobiology
- Vol. 62 (2) , 1536-1557
SWI/SNF Complex Connects Signaling and Epigenetic State in Cells of Nervous System
SWI/SNF protein complexes are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic regulators described in all eukaryotes. In metameric animals, the complexes are involved in all processes occurring in the nervous system, from neurogenesis to higher brain functions. On the one hand, the range of roles is wide because the SWI/SNF complexes act universally by mobilizing the nucleosomes in a chromatin template at multiple loci throughout the genome. On the other hand, the complexes mediate the action of multiple signaling pathways that control most aspects of neural tissue development and function. The issues are discussed to provide insight into the molecular basis of the multifaceted role of SWI/SNFs in cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, activation of immediate-early genes, neurogenesis, and brain and connectome formation. An overview is additionally provided for the molecular basis of nervous system pathologies associated with the SWI/SNF complexes and their contribution to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Finally, we discuss the idea that SWI/SNFs act as an integration platform to connect multiple signaling and genetic programs. Graphical Abstract
- Open Access
3′UTR of mRNA Encoding CPEB Protein Orb2 Plays an Essential Role in Intracellular Transport in Neurons
Intracellular trafficking plays a critical role in the functioning of highly polarized cells, such as neurons. Transport of mRNAs, proteins, and other molecules to synaptic terminals maintains contact between neurons and ensures the transmission of nerve impulses. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding (CPEB) proteins play an essential role in long-term memory (LTM) formation by regulating local translation in synapses. Here, we show that the 3′UTR of the Drosophila CPEB gene orb2 is required for targeting the orb2 mRNA and protein to synapses and that this localization is important for LTM formation. When the orb2 3′UTR is deleted, the orb2 mRNAs and proteins fail to localize in synaptic fractions, and pronounced LTM deficits arise. We found that the phenotypic effects of the orb2 3′UTR deletion were rescued by introducing the 3′UTR from the orb, another Drosophila CPEB gene. In contrast, the phenotypic effects of the 3′UTR deletion were not rescued by the 3′UTR from one of the Drosophila α-tubulin genes. Our results show that the orb2 mRNAs must be targeted to the correct locations in neurons and that proper targeting depends upon sequences in the 3′UTR.
Open Access3′UTR of mRNA Encoding CPEB Protein Orb2 Plays an Essential Role in Intracellular Transport in Neurons
Intracellular trafficking plays a critical role in the functioning of highly polarized cells, such as neurons. Transport of mRNAs, proteins, and other molecules to synaptic terminals maintains contact between neurons and ensures the transmission of nerve impulses. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding (CPEB) proteins play an essential role in long-term memory (LTM) formation by regulating local translation in synapses. Here, we show that the 3′UTR of the Drosophila CPEB gene orb2 is required for targeting the orb2 mRNA and protein to synapses and that this localization is important for LTM formation. When the orb2 3′UTR is deleted, the orb2 mRNAs and proteins fail to localize in synaptic fractions, and pronounced LTM deficits arise. We found that the phenotypic effects of the orb2 3′UTR deletion were rescued by introducing the 3′UTR from the orb, another Drosophila CPEB gene. In contrast, the phenotypic effects of the 3′UTR deletion were not rescued by the 3′UTR from one of the Drosophila α-tubulin genes. Our results show that the orb2 mRNAs must be targeted to the correct locations in neurons and that proper targeting depends upon sequences in the 3′UTR.