Ayolola Eni-Olotu

It is widely understood that cancer is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite numerous available treatments, prognosis for many remains poor, thus, the development of novel therapies remains essential. Given the incredible success of many immunotherapies in this field, the important contribution of the immune system to the control, and elimination, of malignancy is clear. While many immunotherapies target higher-order pathways, for example, through promoting T-cell activation via immune checkpoint blockade, the potential to target specific immunological pathways is largely not well researched. Precisely understanding how immunity can be tailored to respond to specific challenges is an exciting idea with great potential, and may trigger the development of new therapies for cancer. Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) are a group of rare congenital disorders caused by gene mutations that result in immune dysregulation. This heterogeneous group, spanning widespread, multisystem immunopathology to specific immune cell defects, primarily manifest in immunodeficiency symptoms. Thus, these patients are particularly susceptible to life-threatening infection, autoimmunity and malignancy, making IEI an especially complex group of diseases. While precise mechanisms of IEI-induced malignancy have not yet been fully elucidated, analysis of these conditions can highlight the importance of particular genes, and downstream immune responses, in carcinogenesis and may help inform mechanisms which can be utilised in novel immunotherapies. In this review, we examine the links between IEIs and cancer, establishing potential connections between immune dysfunction and malignancy and suggesting roles for specific immunological mechanisms involved in preventing carcinogenesis, thus, guiding essential future research focused on cancer immunotherapy and providing valuable insight into the workings of the immune system in both health and disease.

North West London has one of the highest tuberculosis (TB) rates in the UK, at 24.8 per 10,000. The UK prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is 0.1-0.5% and for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is 0.5-1%. Chronic infection with HBV or HCV can lead to an increased risk of adverse treatment outcomes, such as drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients with active or latent TB. National guidelines recommend routinely screening for HBV/HCV prior to initiating TB treatment. Our objectives were to 1) evaluate the HBV/HCV screening practice in local TB clinics, 2) establish the prevalence of HBV/HCV in patients receiving TB treatment. Retrospective analysis of laboratory and medical records of patients treated for active or latent TB identified from the London TB register and clinic records from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 from London North West NHS Trust. 1409 patients received treatment for TB during the time period of interest; 574 (40.7%) had active disease and 835 (59.3%) had latent infection. 966/1409 patients (68.56%) were screened for HBV and HCV. 55.9% of the active TB group and 77.2% of the latent infection group were tested. 66 (6.8%) patients had isolated anti-HBc positivity, 22 (2.3%) were HBV surface antigen positive and 8 (0.8%) were HCV-antibody positive. HBV surface antigens were more prevalent in active TB patients: 9/321 (2.80%) with active TB versus 13/645 (2.02%) with latent TB. 36/321 (11.21%) active TB patients had HBV core antibodies compared to 30/645 (4.65%) latent TB patients (p < 0.001). Three patients started antiviral treatment following their viral hepatitis diagnosis (one with HBV, two with HCV). The prevalence of chronic HBV in the study population was higher than the estimated UK prevalence. Fifteen diagnoses of hepatitis were new, allowing specialist referral for monitoring of fibrosis and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Three patients required hepatitis treatment. 6.8% of patients were positive for anti-HBc and therefore identified as being at future risk of HBV reactivation if requiring immunosuppressive therapies.TB disproportionately affects marginalised communities; screening for viral hepatitis in TB clinic represents an opportunity to target these hard-to-reach groups to maximise the impact of public health interventions. All Authors: No reported disclosures