Bianca O. Pirlog

Glioblastoma remains one of the most aggressive cancers of the brain, warranting new methods for early diagnosis and more efficient treatment options. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are rather new entities with increased stability compared to their linear counterparts that interact with proteins and act as microRNA sponges, among other functions. Herein, we provide a critical overview of the recently described glioblastoma-related circRNAs in the literature, focusing on their roles on glioblastoma cancer cell proliferation, survival, migration, invasion and metastasis, metabolic reprogramming, and therapeutic resistance. The main roles of circRNAs in regulating cancer processes are due to their regulatory roles in essential oncogenic pathways, including MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and Wnt, which are influenced by various circRNAs. The present work pictures the wide implication of circRNAs in glioblastoma, thus highlighting their potential as future biomarkers and therapeutic targets/agents.

Background: Few data exist on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. A recent trial of mobile stroke units (MSUs) demonstrated faster treatment and improved outcomes, and included PD patients. Aim: To determine outcomes with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and benefit of MSU versus management by emergency medical services (EMS), for PD patients. Methods: Primary outcomes were utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with versus without PD, and PD patients treated by MSU versus standard management by EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were compared. Results: Of the 1047 tPA-eligible ischemic stroke patients, 254 were with PD (baseline mRS 2–5) and 793 were without PD (baseline mRS 0–1). Although PD patients had worse 90-day uw-mRS, higher mortality, more health-care utilization, and worse quality of life than non-disabled patients, 53% returned to at least their baseline mRS, those treated faster had better outcome, and there was no increased bleeding risk. Comparing PD patients treated by MSU versus EMS, 90-day uw-mRS was 0.42 versus 0.36 (p = 0.07) and 57% versus 46% returned to at least their baseline mRS. There was no interaction between disability status and MSU versus EMS group assignment (p = 0.67) for 90-day uw-mRS. Conclusion: PD did not prevent the benefit of faster treatment with tPA in the BEST-MSU study. Our data support inclusion of PD patients in the MSU management paradigm.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) represents an important cause of disability and death. Since only a minor percentage of patients with AIS are eligible for acute therapy, the management of risk factors is mandatory. An important risk factor of AIS is hyperlipemia. The current guidelines recommend a strict correction of it. Statins are recommended as the first-line treatment, while proprotein convertase subtilin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors are administered as a second or even third option when the goal for a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is not achieved. PCSK-9 inhibitors effectively decrease the LDL-C levels through the inhibition of PCSK-9-LDL-receptor complex formation. The in-depth understanding of the PCSK-9 protein mechanism in the metabolism of LDL-C led to the development of effective targeted approaches. Furthermore, a better understanding of the LDL-C metabolic pathway led to the development of newer approaches, which increased the therapeutic options. This article aims to offer an overview of the PCSK-9 inhibitors and their mechanism in reducing the LDL-C levels. Moreover, we will present the main indications of the current guidelines for patients with hyperlipemia and for those who have suffered an acute ischemic stroke, as well as the importance of LDL-C reduction in decreasing the rate of a recurrence.