Stephanie Brogan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Stephanie Brogan has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chloe Macdonald
University Hospital Wishaw & University Hospital Monklands, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie ML6 0JS, UK
1 shared publication - Evropi Theodoratou
Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publication - Farhat Vanessa Nasim Din
Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh
1 shared publication - Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray
Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
1 shared publication - Jennifer Devlin
Colon Cancer Genetics Group, Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
1 shared publication - Malcolm G. Dunlop
Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 13 (7) , 1065
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Symptoms
We aimed to develop and validate prediction models incorporating demographics, clinical features, and a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for individual prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in patients with gastroenterological symptoms. Prediction models were developed with internal validation [CRC Cases: n = 1686/Controls: n = 963]. Candidate predictors included age, sex, BMI, wGRS, family history, and symptoms (changes in bowel habits, rectal bleeding, weight loss, anaemia, abdominal pain). The baseline model included all the non-genetic predictors. Models A (baseline model + wGRS) and B (baseline model) were developed based on LASSO regression to select predictors. Models C (baseline model + wGRS) and D (baseline model) were built using all variables. Models’ calibration and discrimination were evaluated through the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (calibration curves were plotted) and C-statistics (corrected based on 1000 bootstrapping). The models’ prediction performance was: model A (corrected C-statistic = 0.765); model B (corrected C-statistic = 0.753); model C (corrected C-statistic = 0.764); and model D (corrected C-statistic = 0.752). Models A and C, that integrated wGRS with demographic and clinical predictors, had a statistically significant improved prediction performance. Our findings suggest that future application of genetic predictors holds significant promise, which could enhance CRC risk prediction. Therefore, further investigation through model external validation and clinical impact is merited.
- 29 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 13 (7) , 1065
Open AccessDevelopment and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Symptoms
We aimed to develop and validate prediction models incorporating demographics, clinical features, and a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for individual prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in patients with gastroenterological symptoms. Prediction models were developed with internal validation [CRC Cases: n = 1686/Controls: n = 963]. Candidate predictors included age, sex, BMI, wGRS, family history, and symptoms (changes in bowel habits, rectal bleeding, weight loss, anaemia, abdominal pain). The baseline model included all the non-genetic predictors. Models A (baseline model + wGRS) and B (baseline model) were developed based on LASSO regression to select predictors. Models C (baseline model + wGRS) and D (baseline model) were built using all variables. Models’ calibration and discrimination were evaluated through the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (calibration curves were plotted) and C-statistics (corrected based on 1000 bootstrapping). The models’ prediction performance was: model A (corrected C-statistic = 0.765); model B (corrected C-statistic = 0.753); model C (corrected C-statistic = 0.764); and model D (corrected C-statistic = 0.752). Models A and C, that integrated wGRS with demographic and clinical predictors, had a statistically significant improved prediction performance. Our findings suggest that future application of genetic predictors holds significant promise, which could enhance CRC risk prediction. Therefore, further investigation through model external validation and clinical impact is merited.