Fangzhou Lu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Fangzhou Lu has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hu He
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
1 shared publication - Jiang He
School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
1 shared publication - Jinzheng Bai
State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
1 shared publication - Linming Dou
School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
1 shared publication - Linming Dou
State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
1 shared publication - Xiaotao Ma
State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Limitations of Upper Protective Layers as Pressure Relief Measures for Extra-Thick Coal Seam Mining: Insights from a Case Study
Upper protective layer (UPL) mining is extensively utilised as a pressure relief strategy to prevent outbursts and coal bursts. However, when the excavation height of the protected layer is substantial, the depressurisation efficacy of the protective layer may be diminished. This paper takes the Haishiwan coal mine in China as a case study and explores the stress evolution and influencing factors in the mining of extra-thick coal seam beneath the protective layer through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field observation. The results indicate that increasing the excavation height of the coal seam will lead to the upward development of the collapse zone in the overburden of the goaf, with the “masonry beam” structure formed at a higher position by key strata blocks. The overburden above the masonry beam will be supported by the coal rock masse on both sides of the structure, leading to increased stress on the coal seam near the goaf and eliminating the depressurisation effect of the protective layer. Numerical simulation shows that factors such as faults, protective layers, interlayer spacing, and the height of coal seam excavation significantly affect the stress distribution in the protected layer. With the increase in interlayer spacing and the thickness of coal seam extraction, the stress reduction phenomenon of the UPL gradually decreases, especially with an abnormal stress concentration of the gob-side coal seam. Observations of Surface subsidence and the distribution of mining-induced seismic events corroborate the conclusions of theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. The results offer valuable guidance for the mining of extra-thick coal seams and the selection of the UPL.
Open AccessLimitations of Upper Protective Layers as Pressure Relief Measures for Extra-Thick Coal Seam Mining: Insights from a Case Study
Upper protective layer (UPL) mining is extensively utilised as a pressure relief strategy to prevent outbursts and coal bursts. However, when the excavation height of the protected layer is substantial, the depressurisation efficacy of the protective layer may be diminished. This paper takes the Haishiwan coal mine in China as a case study and explores the stress evolution and influencing factors in the mining of extra-thick coal seam beneath the protective layer through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and field observation. The results indicate that increasing the excavation height of the coal seam will lead to the upward development of the collapse zone in the overburden of the goaf, with the “masonry beam” structure formed at a higher position by key strata blocks. The overburden above the masonry beam will be supported by the coal rock masse on both sides of the structure, leading to increased stress on the coal seam near the goaf and eliminating the depressurisation effect of the protective layer. Numerical simulation shows that factors such as faults, protective layers, interlayer spacing, and the height of coal seam excavation significantly affect the stress distribution in the protected layer. With the increase in interlayer spacing and the thickness of coal seam extraction, the stress reduction phenomenon of the UPL gradually decreases, especially with an abnormal stress concentration of the gob-side coal seam. Observations of Surface subsidence and the distribution of mining-induced seismic events corroborate the conclusions of theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. The results offer valuable guidance for the mining of extra-thick coal seams and the selection of the UPL.
- Open Access
- 30 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (13) , 7759
Evolution Laws of Stress–Energy and Progressive Damage Mechanisms of Surrounding Rock Induced by Mining Disturbance
The rock burst induced by the mutual disturbance of mining and excavation is significantly influenced by high static load stress and external dynamic load disturbance. In this paper, the evolution characteristics and progressive damage mechanism of surrounding rock in the process of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation are systematically studied. The results show that the evolution of surrounding rock stress can be roughly divided into three stages: rapid rise in the early stage, continuous rise and step-like decline in the middle stage, and slow rise in the late stage. In the process of parallel mining, the overlying rock movement above the goaf shows the sequence of horizontal penetration of tiny fissures—fracture intensification transition to stratification—non-coordinated caving of middle–low overlying rock—obvious horizontal cracks in the upper key layer. Only under the quasi-static loading mining action does the upper key layer not reach the breaking condition. The wave side of the heading face which is close to the focal point is affected by the dynamic load disturbance, the acceleration duration is short, and the attenuation is relatively fast, so it is the area prone to the earliest impact failure in the face of mining disturbance. The conclusion is helpful to deepen the understanding of the coal burst mechanism of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation.
- 30 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 13 (13) , 7759
Open AccessEvolution Laws of Stress–Energy and Progressive Damage Mechanisms of Surrounding Rock Induced by Mining Disturbance
The rock burst induced by the mutual disturbance of mining and excavation is significantly influenced by high static load stress and external dynamic load disturbance. In this paper, the evolution characteristics and progressive damage mechanism of surrounding rock in the process of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation are systematically studied. The results show that the evolution of surrounding rock stress can be roughly divided into three stages: rapid rise in the early stage, continuous rise and step-like decline in the middle stage, and slow rise in the late stage. In the process of parallel mining, the overlying rock movement above the goaf shows the sequence of horizontal penetration of tiny fissures—fracture intensification transition to stratification—non-coordinated caving of middle–low overlying rock—obvious horizontal cracks in the upper key layer. Only under the quasi-static loading mining action does the upper key layer not reach the breaking condition. The wave side of the heading face which is close to the focal point is affected by the dynamic load disturbance, the acceleration duration is short, and the attenuation is relatively fast, so it is the area prone to the earliest impact failure in the face of mining disturbance. The conclusion is helpful to deepen the understanding of the coal burst mechanism of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation.