Salvatore D’alessandro

Purpose/Objective(s): Peritoneal carcinosis can occur in several gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies and its prognosis is usually poor. With the advent of more effective systemic agents, the overall survival of metastatic patients has been revolutionized and isolated peritoneal or abdominal wall metastases might benefit from local treatments; Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) might be considered in selected patients with oligometastatic presentation. Materials/Methods: Oligometastases were defined according to recent ESTRO/EORTC consensus. Inclusion criteria were as follows: ECOG PS ≤ 2, written informed consent, up to five lesions to be treated at the same time, patients treated with radiotherapy schedules applying minimum 6 Gy per fraction. The primary endpoint of the study was local control (LC); acute and late toxicity, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), time-to-next systemic treatment (TNST), polymetastatic-free survival (PMFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE criteria v5.0. Statistical associations between clinical variables and outcomes were assessed using Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Between April 2020 and September 2024 a total of 26 oligometastatic lesions located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall detected in 20 patients received SBRT with Helical Tomotherapy. All cases have been assessed by a multidisciplinary team. Only in three patients out of twenty did more than one lesion receive SBRT: two lesions in two patients, and five lesions in a single case of colorectal cancer with ongoing third-line systemic treatment. Median total dose was 30 Gy (27–35 Gy) in five fractions (3–5). The most frequent primary neoplasm was ovarian cancer in 14/20, endometrial in 2/20, while the remaining were colorectal, vaginal, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer. Four lesions were located in the abdominal wall, while the remaining twenty-two were located in the peritoneum. Concurrent systemic therapy was administered in 18/20 patients. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 6–59), our 1-year LC was 100%, while 1-year DPFS, PMFS, TNTS and OS rates were 54%, 69%, 61% and 83%, respectively. Abdominal wall location and treatment of a subsequent oligometastatic recurrence with a second course of SBRT were both significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No G ≥ 3 adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Our preliminary data support the use of SBRT in selected cases of oligometastatic disease located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall with excellent results in terms of tolerability and promising clinical outcomes.

Background: Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation’s efficacy. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009. Results: Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation. Conclusions: In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.

With the increasing incidence and mortality rates, cancer remains a major health challenge in the world. Despite advances in therapies and clinical programs, the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs often fails to translate from pre-clinical models to patient clinical trials. To date, pre-clinical cancer models, including two-dimensional cell cultures and animal models, have limited versatility and accuracy in recapitulating the complexity of human cancer. To address these limitations, a growing focus has fostered the development of three-dimensional (3D) tumor models that closely resemble the in vivo tumor microenvironment and heterogeneity. Recent efforts have leveraged bioengineering technologies, such as biofabrication, to engineer new platforms that mimic healthy and diseased organs, aiming to overcome the shortcomings of conventional models, such as for musculoskeletal tissues. Notably, 3D bioprinting has emerged as a powerful tool in cancer research, offering precise control over cell and biomaterial deposition to fabricate architecturally complex and reproducible functional models. The following review underscores the urgent need for more accurate and relevant 3D tumor models, highlighting the advantages of the use of biofabrication approaches to engineer new biomimetics platforms. We provide an updated discussion on the role of bioengineering technologies in cancer research and modeling with particular focus on 3D bioprinting platforms, as well as a close view on biomaterial inks and 3D bioprinting technologies employed in cancer modeling. Further insights into the 3D bioprinting tissue-specific modeling panorama are presented in this paper, offering a comprehensive overview of the new possibilities for cancer study and drug discovery.

Among the mucosal melanomas, vaginal melanomas are very rare tumors, accounting for less than 20% of melanomas arising from the female genital tract. They occur most frequently in women in post-menopausal age, but younger patients may also experience this neoplasm, mainly located in the lower third of the vagina or the anterior wall. The optimal management of this tumor remains controversial, with surgery reported as the most frequently adopted approach. However, a clear benefit of surgical treatment in terms of survival has not yet been demonstrated. Conversely, radiotherapy may represent an attractive non-invasive alternative, and there are several favorable reports of the role of radiation therapy, either delivered with photons, brachytherapy, or hadrontherapy. A wide range of techniques and fractionation regimens are reported with substantially good tolerance to the treatment, and acute G3 or higher toxicities are reported only in the case of concurrent immunotherapy. Of note, due to the rarity of the disease, there is a lack of high-level evidence for the optimal therapeutic option. In this scenario, recent studies theorize the possibility of developing combinatorial approaches of radiotherapy with immunotherapy based on cutaneous melanomas reports. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence available in the literature supporting the role of definitive radiotherapy for vaginal melanomas, with a focus on the combination of RT with immunotherapy, in terms of optimal timing and biological rationale.

Background: The present study reports on the outcomes of our mono-institutional experience of Helical Tomotherapy (HT)-based SRT for brain metastases. The use of this linac is less frequently reported for this kind of treatment. Methods: This retrospective study displays a series of patients treated with HT-SRT. The eligibility of using SRT for brain metastases was defined by a Karnofsky performance status of >70, a life expectancy of >6 months, and controlled extra-cranial disease; no SRT was allowed in the case of a number of brain metastases larger than 10. All the cases were discussed by a multidisciplinary board. Toxicity assessments were performed based on CTCAE v5.0. Survival endpoints were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify any potential predictive factor for an improved outcome. Results: Sixty-four lesions in 37 patients were treated using HT-SRT with a median total dose of 30 Gy in five fractions. The median follow-up was 7 months, and the 1- and 2-year LC rates were both 92.5%. The IPFS rates were and 56.75% and 51.35%. The OS rates were 54% and 40%. The UA showed better IPFS rates significantly related to male sex (p = 0.049), a BED₁₂ of ≥42 Gy (p = 0.006), and controlled extracranial disease (p = 0.03); in the MA, a favorable trend towards LC (p = 0.11) and higher BED (p = 0.11) schedules maintained a correlation with improved IPFS rates, although statistical significance was not reached. Conclusions: HT-based SRT for brain metastases showed safety and efficacy in our monoinstiutional experience. Higher RT doses showed statistical significance for improved outcomes of LC and OS.

Background and purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has a consolidated role in the treatment of bone oligometastases from prostate cancer (PCa). While the evidence for spinal oligometastases SBRT was robust, its role in non-spinal-bone metastases (NSBM) is not standardized. In fact, there was no clear consensus about dose and target definition in this setting. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and the pattern of relapse in SBRT delivered to NSBM from PCa. Materials and methods: From 2016 to 2021, we treated a series of oligo-NSBM from PCa with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT-guided SBRT. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary endpoints were toxicity, the pattern of intraosseous relapse, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), polimetastases-free survival (PMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: a total of 150 NSBM in 95 patients were treated with 30–35 Gy in five fractions. With a median follow-up of 26 months, 1- and 3 years LPFS was 96.3% and 89%, respectively. A biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 198 Gy was correlated with improved LPFS (p = 0.007). Intraosseous relapse occurred in eight (5.3%) cases. Oligorecurrent disease was associated with a better PMFS compared to de novo oligometastatic disease (p = 0.001) and oligoprogressive patients (p = 0.007). No grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred. Conclusion: SBRT is a safe and effective tool for NSBM from PCa in the oligometastatic setting. Intraosseous relapse was a relatively rare event. Predictive factors of the improved outcomes were defined.

Thalassaemia is an autosomal recessive haematological disorder that is characterised by defective synthesis of the globin moiety in...

Background As the use of hypofractionation has spread in the setting of curative prostate radiotherapy, few data are available in the post-operative scenario. This study reports a mono-institutional experience of moderate post-operative hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods In February 2021, we retrospectively assessed the outcomes of 129 patients who received between April 2013 and May 2020 hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy using Helical Tomotherapy. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE criteria v4.0. Survival endpoints were calculated with Kaplan–Meier method. Results Median age and follow-up were, respectively, 67 years and 43 months. Adjuvant and salvage treatment were delivered to 63.5% and 36.4% of patients to a median total dose of 63.8 Gy (61.6–65.25 Gy) in 29 fractions (2.12–2.25 Gy/fraction). Pelvic lymph-nodes irradiation was performed in 67.4% of cases. ADT was added in 50%. Acute toxicity was: G1 and G2 GU events in 36% and 9.3% of cases; G1 and G2 GI events in 29.4% and 13.9%. Late GU toxicity occurred in 12.4% of cases: 3.1% G1, 7.7% G2 and 1.5% G3 events; GI toxicity consisted of 1.5% G1 and 7.7% G2 events. Biochemical relapse occurred in 26.3% of cases, recording no significant differences between adjuvant and salvage (p = 0.67), with 4- and 5-years bRFS rates of 78.7% and 75.6%. Two patients died of progressive disease and eight for non-oncological causes resulting in 3-years overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates of 98% and 98.4%. Conclusions Our experience supports the use of moderate hypofractionation for prostate bed radiotherapy, with minimal toxicity and promising results in terms of clinical outcomes.