Sung Ho Moon
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Sung Ho Moon has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Byeongcheol Lee
Department of Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan 612-896, Korea
1 shared publication - Dae Young Hur
Department of Anatomy, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Daeseok Oh
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
1 shared publication Do Hun Kim
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
1 shared publicationHye Young Kim
Department of Anatomy and Tumor Immunology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
1 shared publicationJae Hong Park
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital of Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 27 March 2024
- Published by International Institute of Anticancer Research in Anticancer Research
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1425-1440
Role of Peroxiredoxin 1 Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Background/Aim: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common cancer in Southern China, is associated with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection. Although many therapies for NPC have been established, the definite role of EBV in NPC remains unclear. Therefore, this work focuses on LMP2A, a latent EBV gene, and investigates whether LMP2A is related to peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) in EBV-positive NPC. Materials and Methods: The mRNA and protein expression levels of LMP2A, PRDX1, and beta-catenin were compared in patient samples. To identify molecular mechanisms, EBV-negative NP69 and EBV-positive C666-1 NPC cell lines were used. After making an agar cell block for cell slides, the intensity of LMP2A expression was observed visually. To measure the level of reactive oxygen species, both fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry were used. To investigate the intracellular signaling molecular mechanisms with and without the LMP2A gene, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were used. Results: Both patient samples and cells of nasopharyngeal carcinoma infected with EBV had increased expression of LMP2A compared with controls, and high ROS levels were identified. Cell viability assay showed that LMP2A promoted cell growth by regulating gene expression. Furthermore, LMP2A induced the expression of PRDX1 and beta-catenin. LMP2A also increased the expression of both cyclin B1 and cyclin D1. Conclusion: In NPC cells, PRDX1 and beta-catenin were regulated through LMP2A expression, which reduced cell growth through cell cycle–related gene expression. This study suggests that LMP2A could be a target molecule for inhibiting cancer progression in NPC cells infected with EBV.
- 27 March 2024
- Published by International Institute of Anticancer Research in Anticancer Research
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1425-1440
Role of Peroxiredoxin 1 Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Background/Aim: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common cancer in Southern China, is associated with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection. Although many therapies for NPC have been established, the definite role of EBV in NPC remains unclear. Therefore, this work focuses on LMP2A, a latent EBV gene, and investigates whether LMP2A is related to peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) in EBV-positive NPC. Materials and Methods: The mRNA and protein expression levels of LMP2A, PRDX1, and beta-catenin were compared in patient samples. To identify molecular mechanisms, EBV-negative NP69 and EBV-positive C666-1 NPC cell lines were used. After making an agar cell block for cell slides, the intensity of LMP2A expression was observed visually. To measure the level of reactive oxygen species, both fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry were used. To investigate the intracellular signaling molecular mechanisms with and without the LMP2A gene, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were used. Results: Both patient samples and cells of nasopharyngeal carcinoma infected with EBV had increased expression of LMP2A compared with controls, and high ROS levels were identified. Cell viability assay showed that LMP2A promoted cell growth by regulating gene expression. Furthermore, LMP2A induced the expression of PRDX1 and beta-catenin. LMP2A also increased the expression of both cyclin B1 and cyclin D1. Conclusion: In NPC cells, PRDX1 and beta-catenin were regulated through LMP2A expression, which reduced cell growth through cell cycle–related gene expression. This study suggests that LMP2A could be a target molecule for inhibiting cancer progression in NPC cells infected with EBV.
- Open Access
- 26 August 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 101 (34) , e30160
Effect of performing preoperative echocardiography in patients with cardiovascular risk on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study
Although echocardiography is widely used for preoperative cardiac risk evaluation, few studies have analyzed the effect of performing preoperative echocardiography on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes. We investigated the effect of performing echocardiography on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes in patients with cardiovascular risk. We retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone major abdominal surgery and satisfied 2 or more of the following criteria: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, age ≥70 years, and previous cardiac disease. Patients were categorized into a group in which preoperative echocardiography was performed (echo) and a group in which it was not (non-echo). The primary outcomes were postoperative 30-day mortality and incidence of cardiovascular complications. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, intraoperative incidence of hypotension, use of vasopressors, and findings on intraoperative invasive hemodynamic monitoring. There were no differences in 30-day mortality, incidence of postoperative cardiovascular complications, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative events between the groups. Only the incidence of cardiac output monitoring was lower in the echo group than in the non-echo group (59.6% vs 73.9%). Preoperative echocardiography does not affect postoperative outcomes, but it has the potential to affect intraoperative anesthetic management such as invasive hemodynamic monitoring during surgery.
- 26 August 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 101 (34) , e30160
Open AccessEffect of performing preoperative echocardiography in patients with cardiovascular risk on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study
Although echocardiography is widely used for preoperative cardiac risk evaluation, few studies have analyzed the effect of performing preoperative echocardiography on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes. We investigated the effect of performing echocardiography on intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes in patients with cardiovascular risk. We retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone major abdominal surgery and satisfied 2 or more of the following criteria: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, age ≥70 years, and previous cardiac disease. Patients were categorized into a group in which preoperative echocardiography was performed (echo) and a group in which it was not (non-echo). The primary outcomes were postoperative 30-day mortality and incidence of cardiovascular complications. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, intraoperative incidence of hypotension, use of vasopressors, and findings on intraoperative invasive hemodynamic monitoring. There were no differences in 30-day mortality, incidence of postoperative cardiovascular complications, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative events between the groups. Only the incidence of cardiac output monitoring was lower in the echo group than in the non-echo group (59.6% vs 73.9%). Preoperative echocardiography does not affect postoperative outcomes, but it has the potential to affect intraoperative anesthetic management such as invasive hemodynamic monitoring during surgery.