Shibao Guo

Reliable traits are needed for identification of tea (Camellia sinensis) cultivars, yet the stability of leaf morphology and color across leaf positions remains unclear. This study evaluated inter-cultivar variation and positional stability in leaf morphological, RGB color, and SPAD traits in six predominant cultivars. One-year-old shoots were sampled in a completely randomized design, and five fully expanded leaves below the apical bud were analyzed. SPAD values were measured with a chlorophyll meter, and scanned images were used to extract contour and RGB traits. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, correlation analysis, PCA, and discriminant analysis. Leaf morphology differed among cultivars and leaf positions, with significant cultivar-by-position interactions; however, the width-to-length ratio differed among cultivars but remained stable across positions in these cultivars. SPAD values increased with leaf position and were strongly associated with RGB components, being negatively correlated with R and G and positively correlated with B. Morphological traits explained 52.988% of total variance in PCA and yielded 64.6% overall classification accuracy, with LaoHan showing the highest accuracy (83.3%). Misclassification was concentrated among genetically similar cultivars. These findings suggest that stable leaf shape proportions and SPAD–RGB relationships provide useful descriptors, whereas genetic relatedness limits morphology-based cultivar identification under the present conditions.

The mitochondrial genome has become the most widely used genomic resource in resolving the insect phylogenetic relationships. In this study, we assess the interrelationships among the syrphid and pipunculid members of Syrphoidea using mitochondrial genome sequences of 152 taxa, 9 of which are newly reported and three are assembled from the existing transcriptome data. The Pipunculidae was found to be deeply nested members of Schizophora, which resulted in a nonmonophyletic Syrphoidea. In the monophyletic Syrphidae, unequivocal robust support was found for Microdontinae as the sister group of all other Syrphidae. The subfamily Eristalinae was nonmonophyletic. The Pipizinae was recovered as the sister group to the Syrphinae, albeit with strong support. As a whole, our results are concord with previously established hypotheses on Syrphoidea from the genome scale data. The mitochondrial genomes were successful in producing a robustly supported phylogenetic framework for the Syrphoidea.

In this study, we newly sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) of two phytophagous scarab beetles, and investigated the deep level relationships within Scarabaeidae combined with other published beetle mitogenome sequences. The complete mitogenomes ofDicronocephalus adamsiPascoe (Cetoniinae) andAmphimallonsp. (Melolonthinae) are 15,563 bp and 17,433 bp in size, respectively. Both mitogenomes have the typical set of 37 genes (13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, two ribosomal RNA genes) and an A+T-rich region, with the same gene arrangement found in the majority of beetles. The secondary structures for ribosomal RNA genes (rrnLandrrnS) were inferred by comparative analysis method. Results from phylogenetic analyses provide support for major lineages and current classification of Scarabaeidae. Amino acid data recovered Scarabaeidae as monophyletic. The Scarabaeidae was split into two clades. One clade contained the subfamilies Scarabaeinae and Aphodiinae. The other major clade contained the subfamilies Dynastinae, Rutelinae, Cetoniinae, Melolonthinae and Sericini. The monophyly of Scarabaeinae, Aphodiinae, Dynastinae, Cetoniinae and Sericini were strongly supported. The Scarabaeinae was the sister group of Aphodiinae. The Cetoniinae was sister to the Dynastinae + Rutelinae clade. The Melolonthinae was a non-monophyletic group. The removal of fast-evolving sites from nucleotide dataset using a pattern sorting method (OV-sorting) supported the family Scarabaeidae as a monophyletic group. At the tribe level, the Onthophagini was non-monophyletic with respect to Oniticellini. Ateuchini was sister to a large clade comprising the tribes Onthophagini, Oniticellini and Onitini. Eurysternini was a sister group of the Phanaeini + Ateuchini clade.