MMMark McKone

Mark McKone

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Mark McKone has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Kathryn W. Ruckart

    Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

    2 shared publications
  • Annalize Sussman

    Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

    1 shared publication
  • Courteney McClutchy

    College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, Florida

    1 shared publication
  • Isabella Cornea

    School of Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics Wake Forest University Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA

    1 shared publication
  • Jacline G. Phillips

    Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

    1 shared publication
  • Jennifer Gabbard

    Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology (A.Z., J.B., J.G.), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • The Efficacy of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block for Chronic Cough: A Scoping Review

    by Courteney McClutchy, Mark McKone, Annalize Sussman, Julia Barry, S. Carter Wright, Lyndsay L. Madden, Kathryn Ruckart


  • Efficacy of Speech-Language Pathology Interventions for Globus Pharyngeus: A Scoping Review

    by Kathryn W. Ruckart, Mark McKone, Jacline G. Phillips, Maris O. Krekelberg, K. Annalize Sussman, Lyndsay L. Madden


  • Open Access

    Evaluating the pragmatic characteristics of advance care planning outcome measures in dementia clinical trials: A scoping review

    by Jennifer L. Gabbard, Joan G. Carpenter, Natalie C. Ernecoff, Kimberly Mournighan, Isabella Cornea, Mark McKone, Laura C. Hanson

    Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that involves discussing a person's goals, values, and preferences; it is particularly important for persons living with dementia (PLWD) given that dementia is incurable and progressive. To ensure results that will impact real‐world practices, ACP outcome measures must be psychometrically strong, meaningful to key partners, and pragmatic to collect. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of outcome measures utilized in ACP randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling PLWD or their care partners and evaluated their pragmatic characteristics. Methods: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for peer‐reviewed ACP RCTs enrolling PLWD or their care partners from 2011 to 2021. We abstracted characteristics of primary and secondary outcome measures, including pragmatic characteristics using an adapted Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale and ACP outcome domains using the standardized ACP Outcome Framework (i.e., process, action, healthcare, or quality of care). Results: We included 21 ACP RCTs. Trials included 103 outcome measures (39 primary and 64 secondary), of which 11% measured process, 14% measured action, 49% measured healthcare, and 26% measured quality of care. Twenty‐four (23%) outcome measures were highly pragmatic, the majority of which (67%) reflected healthcare outcome measures. Sixty‐one (59%) outcomes were assessed as highly relevant to PLWD or their care partners. Only 20% ( n = 21) of outcome measures were embedded into clinical practice. Most (62%) RCTs were conducted in nursing homes, and 33% were focused PLWD with advanced stage disease. Conclusions: In RCTs testing ACP interventions to support PLWD, only 23% of outcome measures were highly pragmatic, and most of these measured healthcare utilizations. Outcome assessments were rarely integrated into the EHR during routine clinical care. New outcome measures that address the lived experience of PLWD and their care partners plus have high pragmatic characteristics are needed for embedded pragmatic clinical trials.