Brent Bryan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Brent Bryan has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christopher J. Miller
NOAO Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719
1 shared publication - Christopher R. Genovese
Carnegie Mellon University
1 shared publication - Christos Faloutsos
Carnegie Mellon University
1 shared publication - Frederick Eberhardt
Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences University of California 94720 Berkeley Berkeley CA
1 shared publication - Jeff Schneider
Machine Learning Department Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh 15213 PA
1 shared publication Larry Wasserman
Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue 15213 Pittsburgh PA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2008
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- No. 10636382,p. 346-355
Compact Similarity Joins
Similarity joins have attracted significant interest, with applications in geographical information systems, astronomy, marketing analyzes, and anomaly detection. However, all the past algorithms, although highly fine-tuned, suffer an output explosion if the query range is even moderately large relative to the local data density. Under such circumstances, the response time and the search effort are both almost quadratic in the database size, which is often prohibitive. We solve this problem by providing two algorithms that find a compact representation of the similarity join result, while retaining all the information in the standard join. Our algorithms have the following characteristics: (a) they are at least as fast as the standard similarity join algorithm, and typically much faster, (b) they generate significantly smaller output, (c) they provably lose no information, (d) they scale well to large data sets, and (e) they can be applied to any of the standard tree data structures. Experiments on real and realistic point-sets show that our algorithms are up to several orders of magnitude faster.
- 1 April 2008
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- No. 10636382,p. 346-355
Compact Similarity Joins
Similarity joins have attracted significant interest, with applications in geographical information systems, astronomy, marketing analyzes, and anomaly detection. However, all the past algorithms, although highly fine-tuned, suffer an output explosion if the query range is even moderately large relative to the local data density. Under such circumstances, the response time and the search effort are both almost quadratic in the database size, which is often prohibitive. We solve this problem by providing two algorithms that find a compact representation of the similarity join result, while retaining all the information in the standard join. Our algorithms have the following characteristics: (a) they are at least as fast as the standard similarity join algorithm, and typically much faster, (b) they generate significantly smaller output, (c) they provably lose no information, (d) they scale well to large data sets, and (e) they can be applied to any of the standard tree data structures. Experiments on real and realistic point-sets show that our algorithms are up to several orders of magnitude faster.
- Open Access
Mapping the Cosmological Confidence Ball Surface
We present a new technique to compute simultaneously valid confidence intervals for a set of model parameters. We apply our method to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe's (WMAP) Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, exploring a seven dimensional space (tau, Omega_DE, Omega_M, omega_DM, omega_B, f_nu, n_s). We find two distinct regions-of-interest: the standard Concordance Model, and a region with large values of omega_DM, omega_B and H_0. This second peak in parameter space can be rejected by applying a constraint (or a prior) on the allowable values of the Hubble constant. Our new technique uses a non-parametric fit to the data, along with a frequentist approach and a smart search algorithm to map out a statistical confidence surface. The result is a confidence ``ball'': a set of parameter values that contains the true value with probability at least 1-alpha. Our algorithm performs a role similar to the often used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which samples from the posterior probability function in order to provide Bayesian credible intervals on the parameters. While the MCMC approach samples densely around a peak in the posterior, our new technique allows cosmologists to perform efficient analyses around any regions of interest: e.g., the peak itself, or, possibly more importantly, the 1-alpha confidence surface.
Open AccessMapping the Cosmological Confidence Ball Surface
We present a new technique to compute simultaneously valid confidence intervals for a set of model parameters. We apply our method to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe's (WMAP) Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, exploring a seven dimensional space (tau, Omega_DE, Omega_M, omega_DM, omega_B, f_nu, n_s). We find two distinct regions-of-interest: the standard Concordance Model, and a region with large values of omega_DM, omega_B and H_0. This second peak in parameter space can be rejected by applying a constraint (or a prior) on the allowable values of the Hubble constant. Our new technique uses a non-parametric fit to the data, along with a frequentist approach and a smart search algorithm to map out a statistical confidence surface. The result is a confidence ``ball'': a set of parameter values that contains the true value with probability at least 1-alpha. Our algorithm performs a role similar to the often used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which samples from the posterior probability function in order to provide Bayesian credible intervals on the parameters. While the MCMC approach samples densely around a peak in the posterior, our new technique allows cosmologists to perform efficient analyses around any regions of interest: e.g., the peak itself, or, possibly more importantly, the 1-alpha confidence surface.