Dongjun Lee
Dongjun Lee has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jaekwang Kim
Sungkyunkwan University
6 shared publications - Donggeun Ko
AiM Future, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 shared publications B.J. Kim
Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
1 shared publicationD.I. Sung
1 shared publication- Dae Ho Yoon
School of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Dong-Min Jeon
Department of Photonics and Nanoelectronics and BK21 FOUR ERICA-ACE Center, Hanyang University ERICA 3 , Ansan, Gyeonggi-do 15588
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 30 June 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 598-610
C3: Capturing Consensus with Contrastive Learning in Group Recommendation
- 30 June 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 598-610
C3: Capturing Consensus with Contrastive Learning in Group Recommendation
- Open Access
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1231-1239
Hierarchical Contrastive Learning with Multiple Augmentations for Sequential Recommendation
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1231-1239
Open AccessHierarchical Contrastive Learning with Multiple Augmentations for Sequential Recommendation
- Open Access
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1290-1292
Debiasing Classifiers by Amplifying Bias with Latent Diffusion and Large Language Models
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1290-1292
Open AccessDebiasing Classifiers by Amplifying Bias with Latent Diffusion and Large Language Models
- Open Access
- 8 April 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1040-1042
Elevating CTR Prediction: Field Interaction, Global Context Integration, and High-Order Representations
Recommendation systems have been increasingly prevalent in online applications. For CTR prediction, attention based models are common as a means to efficiently learn interactions between attribute features. However, self-attention has limitations, such as not considering relationships between fields and causing partial information reflection when specific feature combinations have strong relationships. To enhance this, the research introduces interaction weights to capture field relationships and incorporates Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) and Squeeze and Excitation Networks (SENET) to include global information. Additionally, an extra module is added to address the challenge of creating explicit high-order representations. Experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms all state-of-the-art baseline models in CTR prediction across three public datasets.
- 8 April 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1040-1042
Open AccessElevating CTR Prediction: Field Interaction, Global Context Integration, and High-Order Representations
Recommendation systems have been increasingly prevalent in online applications. For CTR prediction, attention based models are common as a means to efficiently learn interactions between attribute features. However, self-attention has limitations, such as not considering relationships between fields and causing partial information reflection when specific feature combinations have strong relationships. To enhance this, the research introduces interaction weights to capture field relationships and incorporates Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) and Squeeze and Excitation Networks (SENET) to include global information. Additionally, an extra module is added to address the challenge of creating explicit high-order representations. Experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms all state-of-the-art baseline models in CTR prediction across three public datasets.
- Open Access
- 21 October 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4028-4032
AmpliBias: Mitigating Dataset Bias through Bias Amplification in Few-shot Learning for Generative Models
Deep learning models exhibit a dependency on peripheral attributes of input data, such as shapes and colors, leading the models to become biased towards these certain attributes that result in subsequent degradation of performance. In this paper, we alleviate this problem by presenting~\sysname, a novel framework that tackles dataset bias by leveraging generative models to amplify bias and facilitate the learning of debiased representations of the classifier. Our method involves three major steps. We initially train a biased classifier, denoted as f_b, on a biased dataset and extract the top-K biased-conflict samples. Next, we train a generator solely on a bias-conflict dataset comprised of these top-K samples, aiming to learn the distribution of bias-conflict samples. Finally, we re-train the classifier on the newly constructed debiased dataset, which combines the original and amplified data. This allows the biased classifier to competently learn debiased representation. Extensive experiments validate that our proposed method effectively debiases the biased classifier.
- 21 October 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4028-4032
Open AccessAmpliBias: Mitigating Dataset Bias through Bias Amplification in Few-shot Learning for Generative Models
Deep learning models exhibit a dependency on peripheral attributes of input data, such as shapes and colors, leading the models to become biased towards these certain attributes that result in subsequent degradation of performance. In this paper, we alleviate this problem by presenting~\sysname, a novel framework that tackles dataset bias by leveraging generative models to amplify bias and facilitate the learning of debiased representations of the classifier. Our method involves three major steps. We initially train a biased classifier, denoted as f_b, on a biased dataset and extract the top-K biased-conflict samples. Next, we train a generator solely on a bias-conflict dataset comprised of these top-K samples, aiming to learn the distribution of bias-conflict samples. Finally, we re-train the classifier on the newly constructed debiased dataset, which combines the original and amplified data. This allows the biased classifier to competently learn debiased representation. Extensive experiments validate that our proposed method effectively debiases the biased classifier.
- Open Access
- 18 July 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2661-2668
How Important is Periodic Model update in Recommender System?
In real-world recommender model deployments, the models are typically retrained and deployed repeatedly. It is the rule-of-thumb to periodically retrain recommender models to capture up-to-date user behavior and item trends. However, the harm caused by delayed model updates has not been investigated extensively yet. in this perspective paper, we formulate the delayed model update problem and quantitatively demonstrate the delayed model update actually harms the model performance by increasing the number of cold users and cold items increase and decreasing overall model performances. These effects vary across different domains having different characteristics. Upon these findings, we further argue that although the delayed model update has negative effects on online recommender model deployment, yet it has not gathered enough attention from research communities. We argue our verification of the relationship between the model update cycle and model performance calls for further research such as faster model training, and more efficient data pipelines to keep the model more up-to-date with the latest user behaviors and item trends.
- 18 July 2023
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2661-2668
Open AccessHow Important is Periodic Model update in Recommender System?
In real-world recommender model deployments, the models are typically retrained and deployed repeatedly. It is the rule-of-thumb to periodically retrain recommender models to capture up-to-date user behavior and item trends. However, the harm caused by delayed model updates has not been investigated extensively yet. in this perspective paper, we formulate the delayed model update problem and quantitatively demonstrate the delayed model update actually harms the model performance by increasing the number of cold users and cold items increase and decreasing overall model performances. These effects vary across different domains having different characteristics. Upon these findings, we further argue that although the delayed model update has negative effects on online recommender model deployment, yet it has not gathered enough attention from research communities. We argue our verification of the relationship between the model update cycle and model performance calls for further research such as faster model training, and more efficient data pipelines to keep the model more up-to-date with the latest user behaviors and item trends.
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Current Applied Physics
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1435-1440
Freestanding graphene writing on a silicon carbide wafer
- 1 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Current Applied Physics
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1435-1440
Freestanding graphene writing on a silicon carbide wafer
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
- Vol. 272-276, 1956-1958
Annealing effect on the barrier properties and TMR of magnetic tunneling junctions fabricated in various oxidation conditions
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
- Vol. 272-276, 1956-1958
Annealing effect on the barrier properties and TMR of magnetic tunneling junctions fabricated in various oxidation conditions