Jessica L. Pepper
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jessica L. Pepper has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Helen Elizabeth Nuttall
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, United Kingdom
4 shared publications - Theodoros M. Bampouras
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
3 shared publications - Bo Yao
Lancaster University
2 shared publications - Jason J. Braithwaite
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, UK
2 shared publications - Barrie Usherwood
Department of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 326, 121671
Age-related changes in the attentional modulation of multisensory integration in relation to balance maintenance
- 21 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in NeuroImage
- Vol. 326, 121671
Open AccessAge-related changes in the attentional modulation of multisensory integration in relation to balance maintenance
- Open Access
Age-Related Changes in Functional Balance Ability Predict Alpha Activity During Multisensory Integration
The increased multisensory integration and weaker attentional control experienced by older adults during audiovisual processing can result in inaccurate perceptions of their dynamic, everyday environment. These inaccurate representations of our environment can contribute to increased fall risk in older adults. A neural correlate of the attentional difference between younger and older adults could be oscillatory alpha activity (8-12Hz), indexing inhibitory processes during multisensory integration. The current study investigated whether age-related changes in alpha activity underlie weaker attentional control in older adults during a multisensory task, and if alpha associates with fall risk. Thirty-six younger (18-35 years old) and thirty-six older (60-80 years old) adults completed a cued-spatial-attention stream-bounce task, assessing audiovisual integration when attending to validly-cued or invalidly-cued locations, at 0ms or 300ms stimulus-onset asynchronies. Oscillatory alpha activity was recorded throughout using EEG to index participants’ inhibitory abilities. Functional ability and balance were measured to index fall risk. Multiple linear regression models revealed that even when attending to the validly-cued location, less accurate multisensory integration was exhibited by older adults compared to younger adults, suggesting that older adults demonstrate weaker top-down modulation of multisensory integration through failing to inhibit task-irrelevant information. However, alpha power across the trials did not predict the extent of multisensory integration within the task. A significant interaction between age and functional ability scores predicted alpha power, suggesting that older adults may rely on attentional mechanisms for functional ability more than younger adults do. Potential implications in the design of clinical treatments to reduce falls are discussed.
Open AccessAge-Related Changes in Functional Balance Ability Predict Alpha Activity During Multisensory Integration
The increased multisensory integration and weaker attentional control experienced by older adults during audiovisual processing can result in inaccurate perceptions of their dynamic, everyday environment. These inaccurate representations of our environment can contribute to increased fall risk in older adults. A neural correlate of the attentional difference between younger and older adults could be oscillatory alpha activity (8-12Hz), indexing inhibitory processes during multisensory integration. The current study investigated whether age-related changes in alpha activity underlie weaker attentional control in older adults during a multisensory task, and if alpha associates with fall risk. Thirty-six younger (18-35 years old) and thirty-six older (60-80 years old) adults completed a cued-spatial-attention stream-bounce task, assessing audiovisual integration when attending to validly-cued or invalidly-cued locations, at 0ms or 300ms stimulus-onset asynchronies. Oscillatory alpha activity was recorded throughout using EEG to index participants’ inhibitory abilities. Functional ability and balance were measured to index fall risk. Multiple linear regression models revealed that even when attending to the validly-cued location, less accurate multisensory integration was exhibited by older adults compared to younger adults, suggesting that older adults demonstrate weaker top-down modulation of multisensory integration through failing to inhibit task-irrelevant information. However, alpha power across the trials did not predict the extent of multisensory integration within the task. A significant interaction between age and functional ability scores predicted alpha power, suggesting that older adults may rely on attentional mechanisms for functional ability more than younger adults do. Potential implications in the design of clinical treatments to reduce falls are discussed.
- Open Access
- 26 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Vol. 85 (6) , 1905-1919
Age-related changes to the attentional modulation of temporal binding
During multisensory integration, the time range within which visual and auditory information can be perceived as synchronous and bound together is known as the temporal binding window (TBW). With increasing age, the TBW becomes wider, such that older adults erroneously, and often dangerously, integrate sensory inputs that are asynchronous. Recent research suggests that attentional cues can narrow the width of the TBW in younger adults, sharpening temporal perception and increasing the accuracy of integration. However, due to their age-related declines in attentional control, it is not yet known whether older adults can deploy attentional resources to narrow the TBW in the same way as younger adults. This study investigated the age-related changes to the attentional modulation of the TBW. Thirty younger and 30 older adults completed a cued-spatial-attention version of the stream-bounce illusion, assessing the extent to which the visual and auditory stimuli were integrated when presented at three different stimulus-onset asynchronies, and when attending to a validly cued or invalidly cued location. A 2 × 2 × 3 mixed ANOVA revealed that when participants attended to the validly cued location (i.e., when attention was present), susceptibility to the stream-bounce illusion decreased. However, crucially, this attentional manipulation significantly affected audiovisual integration in younger adults, but not in older adults. These findings suggest that older adults have multisensory integration-related attentional deficits. Directions for future research and practical applications surrounding treatments to improve the safety of older adults’ perception and navigation through the environment are discussed.
- 26 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Vol. 85 (6) , 1905-1919
Open AccessAge-related changes to the attentional modulation of temporal binding
During multisensory integration, the time range within which visual and auditory information can be perceived as synchronous and bound together is known as the temporal binding window (TBW). With increasing age, the TBW becomes wider, such that older adults erroneously, and often dangerously, integrate sensory inputs that are asynchronous. Recent research suggests that attentional cues can narrow the width of the TBW in younger adults, sharpening temporal perception and increasing the accuracy of integration. However, due to their age-related declines in attentional control, it is not yet known whether older adults can deploy attentional resources to narrow the TBW in the same way as younger adults. This study investigated the age-related changes to the attentional modulation of the TBW. Thirty younger and 30 older adults completed a cued-spatial-attention version of the stream-bounce illusion, assessing the extent to which the visual and auditory stimuli were integrated when presented at three different stimulus-onset asynchronies, and when attending to a validly cued or invalidly cued location. A 2 × 2 × 3 mixed ANOVA revealed that when participants attended to the validly cued location (i.e., when attention was present), susceptibility to the stream-bounce illusion decreased. However, crucially, this attentional manipulation significantly affected audiovisual integration in younger adults, but not in older adults. These findings suggest that older adults have multisensory integration-related attentional deficits. Directions for future research and practical applications surrounding treatments to improve the safety of older adults’ perception and navigation through the environment are discussed.
- Open Access
- 25 July 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1126
Age-Related Changes to Multisensory Integration and Audiovisual Speech Perception
Multisensory integration is essential for the quick and accurate perception of our environment, particularly in everyday tasks like speech perception. Research has highlighted the importance of investigating bottom-up and top-down contributions to multisensory integration and how these change as a function of ageing. Specifically, perceptual factors like the temporal binding window and cognitive factors like attention and inhibition appear to be fundamental in the integration of visual and auditory information—integration that may become less efficient as we age. These factors have been linked to brain areas like the superior temporal sulcus, with neural oscillations in the alpha-band frequency also being implicated in multisensory processing. Age-related changes in multisensory integration may have significant consequences for the well-being of our increasingly ageing population, affecting their ability to communicate with others and safely move through their environment; it is crucial that the evidence surrounding this subject continues to be carefully investigated. This review will discuss research into age-related changes in the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms of multisensory integration and the impact that these changes have on speech perception and fall risk. The role of oscillatory alpha activity is of particular interest, as it may be key in the modulation of multisensory integration.
- 25 July 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 13 (8) , 1126
Open AccessAge-Related Changes to Multisensory Integration and Audiovisual Speech Perception
Multisensory integration is essential for the quick and accurate perception of our environment, particularly in everyday tasks like speech perception. Research has highlighted the importance of investigating bottom-up and top-down contributions to multisensory integration and how these change as a function of ageing. Specifically, perceptual factors like the temporal binding window and cognitive factors like attention and inhibition appear to be fundamental in the integration of visual and auditory information—integration that may become less efficient as we age. These factors have been linked to brain areas like the superior temporal sulcus, with neural oscillations in the alpha-band frequency also being implicated in multisensory processing. Age-related changes in multisensory integration may have significant consequences for the well-being of our increasingly ageing population, affecting their ability to communicate with others and safely move through their environment; it is crucial that the evidence surrounding this subject continues to be carefully investigated. This review will discuss research into age-related changes in the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms of multisensory integration and the impact that these changes have on speech perception and fall risk. The role of oscillatory alpha activity is of particular interest, as it may be key in the modulation of multisensory integration.