Siema Ramdas
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Siema Ramdas has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Marieke Slootman
Hogeschool INHOLLAND
3 shared publications - Louti Broeksma
Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Medicine, Research in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2 shared publications - Rashmi A. Kusurkar
Research in Education, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 shared publications - Amrita Das
VU Centre for Teaching & Learning, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Anne de la Croix
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education
1 shared publication - Anouk Wouters
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Educational Research
- Vol. 131
Teachers’ attitudes towards equity, diversity, and inclusion in higher education: A scoping review
- 9 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Educational Research
- Vol. 131
Open AccessTeachers’ attitudes towards equity, diversity, and inclusion in higher education: A scoping review
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 31 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Learning Environments Research
- Vol. 28 (2) , 307-322
Creating equitable learning environments by building on differences in higher education: design and implementation of the MIXED model
Creating truly equitable education is a challenge. Equity, diversity, and inclusion endeavours are often characterized by a depreciative deficit-thinking and a problem-based view on diversity. In this article, we present the MIXED model (Multi-perspective Inclusive eXchanges for Equity and Diversity), which can support lecturers in establishing an inclusive learning environment by building on different perspectives and talents in the (college) classroom. The model offers both inspiration and practical guidance as it describes a vision, strategies, and examples of learning activities for various classroom settings (online/offline, larger/smaller). We also describe the theoretical framework and the process of development and implementation. The MIXED model, developed at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, unpacks three phases in classroom dynamics. Feedback from lecturers indicates utilizing the model can lead to a more equitable learning environment. This approach aims to educate future academics and professionals who are capable of building on the different perspectives in diverse settings when resolving complex societal problems.
- 31 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Learning Environments Research
- Vol. 28 (2) , 307-322
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessCreating equitable learning environments by building on differences in higher education: design and implementation of the MIXED model
Creating truly equitable education is a challenge. Equity, diversity, and inclusion endeavours are often characterized by a depreciative deficit-thinking and a problem-based view on diversity. In this article, we present the MIXED model (Multi-perspective Inclusive eXchanges for Equity and Diversity), which can support lecturers in establishing an inclusive learning environment by building on different perspectives and talents in the (college) classroom. The model offers both inspiration and practical guidance as it describes a vision, strategies, and examples of learning activities for various classroom settings (online/offline, larger/smaller). We also describe the theoretical framework and the process of development and implementation. The MIXED model, developed at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, unpacks three phases in classroom dynamics. Feedback from lecturers indicates utilizing the model can lead to a more equitable learning environment. This approach aims to educate future academics and professionals who are capable of building on the different perspectives in diverse settings when resolving complex societal problems.
- Open Access
- 5 January 2024
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Perspectives on Medical Education
- Vol. 13 (1) , 229-238
Learning from the Experts: Stimulating Student Engagement in Small-group Active Learning
Introduction: Engaging students in small-group active learning methods is essential for their development. Yet, medical teachers frequently face difficulties in stimulating this engagement, resulting in students remaining passive or detached from the learning process. The aim of this study was to uncover ways in which expert medical teachers, proficient at cultivating high levels of student engagement, stimulate such engagement. This knowledge might inform faculty development initiatives, so that medical teachers can be better equipped to teach in a way that engages students. Methods: We conducted an interview study using a constructivist grounded theory approach, integrating elements from appreciative inquiry. The eleven participants were qualified medical teachers who repeatedly received high scores on student engagement. Each interview was transcribed, coded, and analyzed using constant comparison until theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: We constructed a grounded theory of expert teaching practice, describing student engagement as an integrated process consisting of three components: 1) aiming for a supportive learning environment; 2) employing a personal educational approach; and 3) facilitating the active learning process. Discussion: This study uncovered that there are multiple ways to stimulate high levels of student engagement. Although there was consensus on the importance of a supportive learning environment and the ability to facilitate the active learning process, participants recognized the contextual nature of student engagement and took on a reflective mindset to adapt strategies to their specific situations. These findings highlight the need for faculty development initiatives to adopt a comprehensive, context-sensitive approach that considers the complexity of student engagement.
- 5 January 2024
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Perspectives on Medical Education
- Vol. 13 (1) , 229-238
Open AccessLearning from the Experts: Stimulating Student Engagement in Small-group Active Learning
Introduction: Engaging students in small-group active learning methods is essential for their development. Yet, medical teachers frequently face difficulties in stimulating this engagement, resulting in students remaining passive or detached from the learning process. The aim of this study was to uncover ways in which expert medical teachers, proficient at cultivating high levels of student engagement, stimulate such engagement. This knowledge might inform faculty development initiatives, so that medical teachers can be better equipped to teach in a way that engages students. Methods: We conducted an interview study using a constructivist grounded theory approach, integrating elements from appreciative inquiry. The eleven participants were qualified medical teachers who repeatedly received high scores on student engagement. Each interview was transcribed, coded, and analyzed using constant comparison until theoretical saturation was achieved. Results: We constructed a grounded theory of expert teaching practice, describing student engagement as an integrated process consisting of three components: 1) aiming for a supportive learning environment; 2) employing a personal educational approach; and 3) facilitating the active learning process. Discussion: This study uncovered that there are multiple ways to stimulate high levels of student engagement. Although there was consensus on the importance of a supportive learning environment and the ability to facilitate the active learning process, participants recognized the contextual nature of student engagement and took on a reflective mindset to adapt strategies to their specific situations. These findings highlight the need for faculty development initiatives to adopt a comprehensive, context-sensitive approach that considers the complexity of student engagement.
- Open Access
- 31 July 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (8) , 777
Managing “Hot Moments” in Diverse Classrooms for Inclusive and Equitable Campuses
Classrooms are fundamental components of university campuses. The creation of inclusive and equitable campus environments is incumbent upon the teachers who need to navigate through “hot moments”, which typically refers to situations or incidents that generate intense emotions or strong reactions among the students or between the students and teachers. The literature suggests that many “hot moments” occur due to microaggressions in the classroom and that issues of difference, power, and privilege underlie “hot moments”. Based on qualitative research done with university teachers in a Dutch institution, our research shows that teacher-described “hot moments” can be analyzed under three interrelated dimensions: individual, interactional, and institutional. We suggest educators and higher education policy makers read through these experiences as a way to better understand the challenges their colleagues face, most often alone as the classroom’s leader; in the hope of advancing change efforts to create more inclusive and equitable class environments which will change how minoritized students experience university education.
- 31 July 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (8) , 777
Open AccessManaging “Hot Moments” in Diverse Classrooms for Inclusive and Equitable Campuses
Classrooms are fundamental components of university campuses. The creation of inclusive and equitable campus environments is incumbent upon the teachers who need to navigate through “hot moments”, which typically refers to situations or incidents that generate intense emotions or strong reactions among the students or between the students and teachers. The literature suggests that many “hot moments” occur due to microaggressions in the classroom and that issues of difference, power, and privilege underlie “hot moments”. Based on qualitative research done with university teachers in a Dutch institution, our research shows that teacher-described “hot moments” can be analyzed under three interrelated dimensions: individual, interactional, and institutional. We suggest educators and higher education policy makers read through these experiences as a way to better understand the challenges their colleagues face, most often alone as the classroom’s leader; in the hope of advancing change efforts to create more inclusive and equitable class environments which will change how minoritized students experience university education.