Laura C. Zwiers
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Laura C. Zwiers has a total of 59 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David S. Y. Ong
Affiliations Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
4 shared publications - Diederick E. Grobbee
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
4 shared publications Brianna M. Goodale
Ava Femtec, Zurich, Switzerland
2 shared publicationsDiederick E. Grobbee
Department of Global Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 shared publicationsGeorge S. Downward
Department of Global Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 shared publicationsMarianna Mitratza
Department of Global Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health
- Vol. 3 (4) , 100264
Increasing Retention in a Large-Scale Decentralized Clinical Trial: Learnings From the COVID-RED Trial
- 11 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health
- Vol. 3 (4) , 100264
Open AccessIncreasing Retention in a Large-Scale Decentralized Clinical Trial: Learnings From the COVID-RED Trial
- Open Access
Clinical Course, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Administration of mRNA-1273 Vaccination: A Protocol for a Federated Real-World Evidence Vaccine Safety Study Using Data from Five European Data Sources
Background: Myocarditis and pericarditis are recognised risks following COVID-19 vaccination, including the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Most cases occur shortly following the second dose of this vaccine, and incidence is highest among young males. However, little is known about risk factors beyond age and sex and about the longer-term clinical course. This study aims to identify possible risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination, to characterise the clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis, both associated with mRNA-1273 vaccination and not associated with vaccination, and to identify risk factors for severe outcomes (i.e., cardiac or thromboembolic complications, severe hospital outcomes, all-cause hospital readmission, and death). Methods: This study is being conducted within the Vaccine Monitoring Collaboration for Europe (VAC4EU) association using routinely collected healthcare data from five data sources from four European countries (Denmark, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom). The study is being performed using a common data model, and all analyses are performed separately in each data source in a federated manner following a common protocol. A case–cohort analysis set is identified within each data source for identifying potential risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using logistic regression analysis. The clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis is being assessed using a cohort study design and describes all cases (i.e., cases associated with mRNA-1273 and unexposed cases). Cox regression analysis is applied to assess the associations between risk factors and several follow-up outcomes. Conclusions: This protocol describes the study methodology of an international collaborative initiative with the aim of assessing the risk factors and clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using a federated network of five European data sources.
Open AccessClinical Course, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Administration of mRNA-1273 Vaccination: A Protocol for a Federated Real-World Evidence Vaccine Safety Study Using Data from Five European Data Sources
Background: Myocarditis and pericarditis are recognised risks following COVID-19 vaccination, including the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Most cases occur shortly following the second dose of this vaccine, and incidence is highest among young males. However, little is known about risk factors beyond age and sex and about the longer-term clinical course. This study aims to identify possible risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination, to characterise the clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis, both associated with mRNA-1273 vaccination and not associated with vaccination, and to identify risk factors for severe outcomes (i.e., cardiac or thromboembolic complications, severe hospital outcomes, all-cause hospital readmission, and death). Methods: This study is being conducted within the Vaccine Monitoring Collaboration for Europe (VAC4EU) association using routinely collected healthcare data from five data sources from four European countries (Denmark, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom). The study is being performed using a common data model, and all analyses are performed separately in each data source in a federated manner following a common protocol. A case–cohort analysis set is identified within each data source for identifying potential risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using logistic regression analysis. The clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis is being assessed using a cohort study design and describes all cases (i.e., cases associated with mRNA-1273 and unexposed cases). Cox regression analysis is applied to assess the associations between risk factors and several follow-up outcomes. Conclusions: This protocol describes the study methodology of an international collaborative initiative with the aim of assessing the risk factors and clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using a federated network of five European data sources.
- Open Access
- 5 June 2025
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 20 (6) , e0325116
Remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections using a wearable-based algorithm: Results from the COVID-RED study, a prospective randomised single-blinded crossover trial
Background: Rapid and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially during the pre- or asymptomatic phase, could aid in reducing virus spread. Physiological parameters measured by wearable devices can be efficiently analysed to provide early detection of infections. The COVID-19 Remote Early Detection (COVID-RED) trial investigated the use of a wearable device (Ava bracelet) for improved early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections in real-time. Trial design: Prospective, single-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, randomised controlled crossover trial. Methods: Subjects wore a medical device and synced it with a mobile application in which they also reported symptoms. Subjects in the experimental condition received real-time infection indications based on an algorithm using both wearable device and self-reported symptom data, while subjects in the control arm received indications based on daily symptom-reporting only. Subjects were asked to get tested for SARS-CoV-2 when receiving an app-generated alert, and additionally underwent periodic SARS-CoV-2 serology testing. The overall and early detection performance of both algorithms was evaluated and compared using metrics such as sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 17,825 subjects were randomised within the study. Subjects in the experimental condition received an alert significantly earlier than those in the control condition (median of 0 versus 7 days before a positive SARS-CoV-2 test). The experimental algorithm achieved high sensitivity (93.8–99.2%) but low specificity (0.8–4.2%) when detecting infections during a specified period, while the control algorithm achieved more moderate sensitivity (43.3–46.4%) and specificity (66.4–65.0%). When detecting infection on a given day, the experimental algorithm also achieved higher sensitivity compared to the control algorithm (45–52% versus 28–33%), but much lower specificity (38–50% versus 93–97%). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential role of wearable devices in early detection of SARS-CoV-2. The experimental algorithm overestimated infections, but future iterations could finetune the algorithm to improve specificity and enable it to differentiate between respiratory illnesses. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register number NL9320.
- 5 June 2025
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 20 (6) , e0325116
Open AccessRemote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections using a wearable-based algorithm: Results from the COVID-RED study, a prospective randomised single-blinded crossover trial
Background: Rapid and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially during the pre- or asymptomatic phase, could aid in reducing virus spread. Physiological parameters measured by wearable devices can be efficiently analysed to provide early detection of infections. The COVID-19 Remote Early Detection (COVID-RED) trial investigated the use of a wearable device (Ava bracelet) for improved early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections in real-time. Trial design: Prospective, single-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, randomised controlled crossover trial. Methods: Subjects wore a medical device and synced it with a mobile application in which they also reported symptoms. Subjects in the experimental condition received real-time infection indications based on an algorithm using both wearable device and self-reported symptom data, while subjects in the control arm received indications based on daily symptom-reporting only. Subjects were asked to get tested for SARS-CoV-2 when receiving an app-generated alert, and additionally underwent periodic SARS-CoV-2 serology testing. The overall and early detection performance of both algorithms was evaluated and compared using metrics such as sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 17,825 subjects were randomised within the study. Subjects in the experimental condition received an alert significantly earlier than those in the control condition (median of 0 versus 7 days before a positive SARS-CoV-2 test). The experimental algorithm achieved high sensitivity (93.8–99.2%) but low specificity (0.8–4.2%) when detecting infections during a specified period, while the control algorithm achieved more moderate sensitivity (43.3–46.4%) and specificity (66.4–65.0%). When detecting infection on a given day, the experimental algorithm also achieved higher sensitivity compared to the control algorithm (45–52% versus 28–33%), but much lower specificity (38–50% versus 93–97%). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential role of wearable devices in early detection of SARS-CoV-2. The experimental algorithm overestimated infections, but future iterations could finetune the algorithm to improve specificity and enable it to differentiate between respiratory illnesses. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register number NL9320.
- Open Access
- 21 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-14
Federated learning as a smart tool for research on infectious diseases
The use of real-world data has become increasingly popular, also in the field of infectious disease (ID), particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic emerged. While much useful data for research is being collected, these data are generally stored across different sources. Privacy concerns limit the possibility to store the data centrally, thereby also limiting the possibility of fully leveraging the potential power of combined data. Federated learning (FL) has been suggested to overcome privacy issues by making it possible to perform research on data from various sources without those data leaving local servers. In this review, we discuss existing applications of FL in ID research, as well as the most relevant opportunities and challenges of this method. References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus until July 2023. We searched for studies using FL in different applications related to ID. Thirty references were included and divided into four sub-topics: disease screening, prediction of clinical outcomes, infection epidemiology, and vaccine research. Most research was related to COVID-19. In all studies, FL achieved good accuracy when predicting diseases and outcomes, also in comparison to non-federated methods. However, most studies did not make use of real-world federated data, but rather showed the potential of FL by using data that was manually partitioned. FL is a promising methodology which allows using data from several sources, potentially generating stronger and more generalisable results. However, further exploration of FL application possibilities in ID research is needed.
- 21 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-14
Open AccessFederated learning as a smart tool for research on infectious diseases
The use of real-world data has become increasingly popular, also in the field of infectious disease (ID), particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic emerged. While much useful data for research is being collected, these data are generally stored across different sources. Privacy concerns limit the possibility to store the data centrally, thereby also limiting the possibility of fully leveraging the potential power of combined data. Federated learning (FL) has been suggested to overcome privacy issues by making it possible to perform research on data from various sources without those data leaving local servers. In this review, we discuss existing applications of FL in ID research, as well as the most relevant opportunities and challenges of this method. References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus until July 2023. We searched for studies using FL in different applications related to ID. Thirty references were included and divided into four sub-topics: disease screening, prediction of clinical outcomes, infection epidemiology, and vaccine research. Most research was related to COVID-19. In all studies, FL achieved good accuracy when predicting diseases and outcomes, also in comparison to non-federated methods. However, most studies did not make use of real-world federated data, but rather showed the potential of FL by using data that was manually partitioned. FL is a promising methodology which allows using data from several sources, potentially generating stronger and more generalisable results. However, further exploration of FL application possibilities in ID research is needed.
- Open Access
- 8 January 2024
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Global Heart
- Vol. 19 (1)
Correction: COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors
Global Heart is the official and primary publication of the World Heart Federation, offering a platform for the dissemination of knowledge on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programmes in the area of cardiovascular disease. Global Heart welcomes research results, points of view and educational material on the prevention, treatment and control of cardiovascular disease with a special focus on low and middle-income countries which are facing the brunt of epidemiological transition.Global Heart strongly encourages authors to adhere to CONSORT, STROBE, STARD, and PRISMA guidelines for reporting of clinical trials, observational studies, diagnostic test accuracy papers, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Authors are required for submission to download and complete the appropriate Equator Network checklist: http://www.equator-network.org/.
- 8 January 2024
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Global Heart
- Vol. 19 (1)
Open AccessCorrection: COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors
Global Heart is the official and primary publication of the World Heart Federation, offering a platform for the dissemination of knowledge on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programmes in the area of cardiovascular disease. Global Heart welcomes research results, points of view and educational material on the prevention, treatment and control of cardiovascular disease with a special focus on low and middle-income countries which are facing the brunt of epidemiological transition.Global Heart strongly encourages authors to adhere to CONSORT, STROBE, STARD, and PRISMA guidelines for reporting of clinical trials, observational studies, diagnostic test accuracy papers, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Authors are required for submission to download and complete the appropriate Equator Network checklist: http://www.equator-network.org/.
- Open Access
- 31 July 2023
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Global Heart
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1
COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors
This article details a correction to: Zwiers LC, Ong DSY, Grobbee DE. COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors. Global Heart. 2023; 18(1): 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1252
- 31 July 2023
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Global Heart
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1
Open AccessCOVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors
This article details a correction to: Zwiers LC, Ong DSY, Grobbee DE. COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Towards Identification of Risk Factors. Global Heart. 2023; 18(1): 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1252