G. Laskowski
Research Subjects
Research Interests
G. Laskowski has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Harshal D. Akolekar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India
1 shared publication - Nicholas Hutchins
University of Melbourne
1 shared publication - Richard D. Sandberg
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
1 shared publication - Vittorio Michelassi
Baker Hughes, a GE Company, Florence 50127, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 30 September 2019
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Turbomachinery
- Vol. 141 (10)
Machine-Learnt Turbulence Closures for Low-Pressure Turbines With Unsteady Inflow Conditions
The design of low-pressure turbines (LPTs) must account for the losses generated by the unsteady interaction with the upstream blade row. The estimation of such unsteady wake-induced losses requires the accurate prediction of the incoming wake dynamics and decay. Existing linear turbulence closures (stress–strain relationships), however, do not offer an accurate prediction of the wake mixing. Therefore, machine-learnt, nonlinear turbulence closures (models) have been developed for LPT flows with unsteady inflow conditions using a zonal-based model development approach, with an aim to enhance the wake mixing prediction for unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes calculations. High-fidelity time-averaged and phase-lock averaged data at a realistic isentropic Reynolds number and two reduced frequencies, i.e., with discrete incoming wakes and with wake “fogging,” have been used as reference data for a machine learning algorithm based on gene expression programing to develop models. Models developed via phase-lock averaged data were able to capture the effect of certain prominent physical phenomena in LPTs such as wake–wake interactions, whereas models based on the time-averaged data could not. Correlations with the flow physics lead to a set of models that can effectively enhance the wake mixing prediction across the entire LPT domain for both cases. Based on a newly developed error metric, the developed models have reduced the a priori error over the Boussinesq approximation on average by 45%. This study thus aids blade designers in selecting the appropriate nonlinear closures capable of mimicking the physical mechanisms responsible for loss generation.
- 30 September 2019
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Turbomachinery
- Vol. 141 (10)
Machine-Learnt Turbulence Closures for Low-Pressure Turbines With Unsteady Inflow Conditions
The design of low-pressure turbines (LPTs) must account for the losses generated by the unsteady interaction with the upstream blade row. The estimation of such unsteady wake-induced losses requires the accurate prediction of the incoming wake dynamics and decay. Existing linear turbulence closures (stress–strain relationships), however, do not offer an accurate prediction of the wake mixing. Therefore, machine-learnt, nonlinear turbulence closures (models) have been developed for LPT flows with unsteady inflow conditions using a zonal-based model development approach, with an aim to enhance the wake mixing prediction for unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes calculations. High-fidelity time-averaged and phase-lock averaged data at a realistic isentropic Reynolds number and two reduced frequencies, i.e., with discrete incoming wakes and with wake “fogging,” have been used as reference data for a machine learning algorithm based on gene expression programing to develop models. Models developed via phase-lock averaged data were able to capture the effect of certain prominent physical phenomena in LPTs such as wake–wake interactions, whereas models based on the time-averaged data could not. Correlations with the flow physics lead to a set of models that can effectively enhance the wake mixing prediction across the entire LPT domain for both cases. Based on a newly developed error metric, the developed models have reduced the a priori error over the Boussinesq approximation on average by 45%. This study thus aids blade designers in selecting the appropriate nonlinear closures capable of mimicking the physical mechanisms responsible for loss generation.