Loreto Sáez-Benito

Achieving clinical effectiveness with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requires a Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) above 65%. TTR is influenced by genetics (CYP2C9, VKORC1, CYP4F2), treatment adherence, and knowledge. The SAMe-TT2R2 algorithm is used to assess VKA treatment suitability. In this case report, SAMe-TT2R2 and pharmacogenetic analysis were used to improve oral anticoagulant management in a patient with poor control of INR. An 84-year-old, obese male with atrial fibrillation, undergoing acenocoumarol therapy, had a suboptimal TTR. An assessment with the SAMe-TT2R2 algorithm indicated a favorable profile for VKA use. An educational intervention on vitamin K-rich foods was conducted, and his physician was informed about the interaction between omeprazole and acenocoumarol, recommending its replacement with pantoprazole. This intervention was accepted by the physician and, three months post-intervention, the patient’s TTR improved to 100%. Poor adherence and limited knowledge contributed to treatment failures in patients with a good VKA profile. Pharmaceutical interventions significantly improved TTR management. Patients with favorable genetic and clinical profiles could achieve adequate control of their anticoagulant medication through these interventions. Predictive tools may help select patients who can effectively and safely use VKAs through pharmaceutical interventions.

Tacrolimus (TAC) is a narrow-therapeutic-range immunosuppressant drug used after organ transplantation. A therapeutic failure is possible if drug levels are not within the therapeutic range after the first year of treatment. Pharmacogenetic variants and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are involved. We describe a patient case of a young man (16 years old) with a renal transplant receiving therapy including TAC, mycophenolic acid (MFA), prednisone and omeprazole for prophylaxis of gastric and duodenal ulceration. The patient showed great fluctuation in TAC blood concentration/oral dose ratio, as well as pharmacotherapy adverse effects (AEs) and frequent diarrhea episodes. Additionally, decreased kidney function was found. A pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, including pharmacogenetic analysis, was carried out. The selection of the genes studied was based on the previous literature (CYP3A5, CYP3A4, POR, ABCB1, PXR and CYP2C19). A drug interaction with omeprazole was reported and the nephrologist switched to rabeprazole. A lower TAC concentration/dose ratio was achieved, and the patient’s condition improved. In addition, the TTT haplotype of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) and Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) gene variants seemed to affect TAC pharmacotherapy in the studied patient and could explain the occurrence of long-term adverse effects post-transplantation. These findings suggest that polymorphic variants and co-treatments must be considered in order to achieve the effectiveness of the immunosuppressive therapy with TAC, especially when polymedicated patients are involved. Moreover, pharmacogenetics could influence the drug concentration at the cellular level, both in lymphocyte and in renal tissue, and should be explored in future studies.

Introduction: Anticoagulation treatment with VKA presents an optimal risk-benefit balance in patients with a Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) >70%. Pharmacist integration in the primary health care team, using innovative tools such as the SAME-TT2R2 and pharmacogenetics information, could enhance the management of anticoagulated patients. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a medication review with follow up service by community pharmacists, in collaboration with Primary Care for patients treated with VKA. Methods and analysis: A randomized controlled study with blinded outcome assessment will be conducted. Patients treated with VKA with TTREthics and dissemination: The study design was approved by the ethical committee of Aragon. The trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov dated 25/05/2017: NCT03154489. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.

Background: Medication review with follow-up (MRF) is a service where community pharmacists undertake a medication review with monthly follow-up to provide continuing care. The ConSIGUE Program assessed the impact and implementation of MRF for aged polypharmacy patients in Spanish Community Pharmacies. The present paper reports on the clinical impact evaluation phase of ConSIGUE. Objective: The main objective of the study was to measure the effect of MRF on the primary outcome of the number of uncontrolled health problems. Secondary objectives were to analyze the drug-related problems (DRPs) identified as potential causes of ineffective or unsafe medications and the pharmacists’ interventions implemented during MRF provision. Methods: An open-label multi-centered cluster randomized study with comparison group (CG) was carried out in community pharmacies from 4 provinces in Spain during 6 months. The main inclusion criteria were patients over 64 years old, using 5 or more medicines. The intervention group (IG) received the MRF service (advanced medication review-type 3 MR) whereas patients in the CG received usual care. Results: 178 pharmacies recruited 1403 patients (IG= 688 patients; CG= 715 patients). During the 6 months of the study 72 patients were lost to follow up. The adjusted multi-level random effects models showed a significant reduction in the number of uncontrolled health problems over the periods in the IG (-0.72, 95% CI: -0.80, -0.65) and no change in the CG (-0.03, 95%CI: -0.10, 0.04). Main DRPs identified as potential causes of failures of uncontrolled health problems’ treatment were undertreated condition (559 DRPs; 35.81%), lack of treatment adherence (261 DRP; 16.67%) and risk of adverse effects (207 DRPs; 13.53%). Interventions performed by pharmacist to solve DRP mainly included the addition (246 interventions; 14.67%) and change (330 interventions; 19.68%) of a medicine and educational interventions on medicine adherence (231 interventions; 13.78%) and non-pharmacological interventions (369 interventions; 22.01%). Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the impact of community pharmacist on clinical outcomes for aged patients. It suggests that the provision of an MRF in collaboration with general medical practitioners and patients contributes to the improvement of aged polypharmacy patients’ health status and reduces their problems related with the use of medicines.

“Protégete del sol, protégete del Lupus”. Integración curricular en el grado de Farmacia a través de la Metodología aprendizaje Servicio

Background: cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPSs) encompass a variety of pharmacists' interventions to optimise pharmacotherapy. The clinical effectiveness of CPSs for aged patients remains controversial. Objective: to analyse and describe the evidence of the clinical effectiveness of CPSs in aged patients by means of performing a systematic review of systematic reviews. Methods: using the recommended methodology by Cochrane, a search was undertaken for systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness of CPSs in MEDLINE, EMBASE, DOAJ, SCIELO and COCHRANE LIBRARY. Reviews were assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Quality of the evidence in the reviews was ranked using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: a total of 14 systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were analysed. The overall quality of the reviews was moderate. High and moderate strength of evidence was found for the positive effect of certain CPSs on reducing the number and improving the appropriateness of medicines. There was conflicting evidence of the effect on adherence. There was limited evidence of high and moderate strength on clinical outcomes. No positive evidence was found on mortality, hospitalisations, functional capacity and cognitive function. No systematic reviews reported the effect on the level of control of health problems. Conclusions: certain types of CPSs reduce the number of medicines and improve the appropriateness of prescriptions. Longer follow-up periods and/or the use of surrogate clinical variables measuring the short-term impact are required to demonstrate the effect on clinical outcomes.