Bi-Xun Li

Bi-Xun Li

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Bi-Xun Li has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Cheng-En Deng

    Department of Urology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China

    1 shared publication
  • Kun-Peng Bu

    Department of Comprehensive Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China

    1 shared publication
  • Lu-Huai Feng

    Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Nephrology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, China

    1 shared publication
  • Shuang Ren

    Department of Comprehensive Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China

    1 shared publication
  • Zhenhua Yang

    Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Digestive Carcinoma Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

    by Lu-Huai Feng, Kun-Peng Bu, Shuang Ren, Zhenhua Yang, Bi-Xun Li, Cheng-En Deng

    Purpose: Digestive carcinomas remain a major health burden worldwide and are closely related to type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a digestive carcinoma risk prediction model to identify high-risk individuals among those with type 2 diabetes. Patients and Methods: The prediction model was developed in a primary cohort that consisted of 655 patients with type 2 diabetes. Data were collected from November 2013 to December 2018. Clinical parameters and demographic characteristics were analyzed by logistic regression to develop a model to predict the risk of digestive carcinomas; then, a nomogram was constructed. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. The results were internally validated by a bootstrapping procedure. The independent validation cohort consisted of 275 patients from January 2019 to December 2019. Results: Predictors in the prediction nomogram included sex, age, insulin use, and body mass index. The model showed good discrimination (C-index 0.747 [95% CI, 0.718– 0.791]) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P=0.541). The nomogram showed similar discrimination in the validation cohort (C-index 0.706 [95% CI, 0.682– 0.755]) and good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P=0.418). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram would be clinically useful. Conclusion: We developed a low-cost and low-risk model based on clinical and demographic parameters to help identify patients with type 2 diabetes who might benefit from digestive cancer screening.