Rebecca Roth

The inositol triphosphate-associated, ER transmembrane proteins inositol triphosphate receptor-associated guanylate kinase substrate (IRAG) and lymphoid restricted membrane protein (LRMP) are isoform-specific regulators of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide–sensitive isoform 4 (HCN4) channel. LRMP prevents cAMP-dependent potentiation of HCN4, while IRAG mimics the effect of cAMP on the channel. We previously showed that regulation by LRMP requires both the N terminus of HCN4 as well as a unique set of residues in the cAMP transduction center of HCN4, which is comprised of the N-terminal HCN domain (HCND), the C-linker, and the S4–S5 linker. However, it remains unknown if the homologous IRAG requires similar structural features to mimic cAMP-dependent potentiation, or if the site and mechanism of action are different between the two regulators. Using patch-clamp electrophysiology, we determined that the initial 43 amino acids of IRAG are necessary and sufficient to confer regulation of HCN4. Similar to LRMP, IRAG also requires a portion of the N terminus of HCN4 to confer its regulatory effects. Also like LRMP, two point mutations in the C-linker region, near where the C-linker of one subunit contacts its neighboring subunit, were able to eliminate the effect of IRAG. Taken together, these findings suggest a model whereby IRAG and LRMP make complex interactions with a number of intracellular domains of HCN4. For both proteins, regulation of HCN4 requires a portion of the N terminus and at least some portions of the structural domains required to convert the binding of cAMP to the cyclic nucleotide–binding domain (CNBD) to a change in channel gating.

The inositol triphosphate-associated, ER transmembrane proteins IRAG and LRMP are isoform specific regulators of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-sensitive isoform 4 (HCN4) channel. LRMP prevents cAMP-dependent potentiation of HCN4, while IRAG mimics the effect of cAMP on the channel. We previously showed that regulation by LRMP requires both the N-terminus of HCN4 and a unique orientation of the HCN4 cAMP transduction center, which is comprised of the N-terminal HCN domain, the C-linker, and the S4-S5 linker. However, it remains unknown if the homologous IRAG requires similar structural features to mimic cAMP-dependent potentiation, or if the site and mechanism of action are different between the two regulators. Using patch clamp electrophysiology, we determined that the initial 43 amino acids of IRAG are necessary and sufficient to confer regulation of HCN4. Similar to LRMP, IRAG also requires a portion of the N-terminus of HCN4 to confer its regulatory effects. Also similar to LRMP, two point mutations in the C-linker region, which are the only sequence differences in that region between HCN4 and the other HCN isoforms, were able to eliminate the effect of IRAG suggesting the unique orientation of the cAMP transduction center in HCN4 is likely important for IRAG function. Taken together, these findings suggest a model whereby IRAG and LRMP interact with the channel in similar regions, although potentially in unique ways, and act on the cAMP transduction center with LRMP inhibiting the coupling of this region to gating and IRAG strengthening it. SUMMARY: The ER transmembrane protein IRAG binds to and potentiates HCN4 channels. This study demonstrates that IRAG regulation of HCN4 requires only the first 43 amino acids of IRAG and involves contributions from the N-terminus and cAMP transduction center of HCN4.

Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels are pivotal for cellular signaling, and mutations in Nav channels can lead to excitability disorders in cardiac, muscular, and neural tissues. A major cluster of pathological mutations localizes in the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), resulting in either gain-of-function, loss-of-function effects, or both. However, the mechanism behind this functional diversity of mutations at equivalent positions remains elusive. Through hotspot analysis, we identified three gating charges (R1, R2, and R3) as major mutational hotspots in VSDs. The same amino acid substitutions at equivalent gating-charge positions in VSDI and VSDII of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 show differential gating property impacts in electrophysiology measurements. We conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on wild-type channels and six mutants to elucidate the structural basis of their differential impacts. Our 120-µs MD simulations with applied external electric fields captured VSD state transitions and revealed the differential structural dynamics between equivalent R-to-Q mutants. Notably, we observed transient leaky conformations in some mutants during structural transitions, offering a detailed structural explanation for gating-pore currents. Our salt-bridge network analysis uncovered VSD-specific and state-dependent interactions among gating charges, countercharges, and lipids. This detailed analysis revealed how mutations disrupt critical electrostatic interactions, thereby altering VSD permeability and modulating gating properties. By demonstrating the crucial importance of considering the specific structural context of each mutation, our study advances our understanding of structure–function relationships in Nav channels. Our work establishes a robust framework for future investigations into the molecular basis of ion channel–related disorders.

Voltage-gated sodium (Na _v ) channels are pivotal for cellular signaling and mutations in Na _v channels can lead to excitability disorders in cardiac, muscular, and neural tissues. A major cluster of pathological mutations localizes in the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), resulting in either gain-of-function (GoF), loss-of-function (LoF) effects, or both. However, the mechanism behind this functional divergence of mutations at equivalent positions remains elusive. Through hotspot analysis, we identified three gating charges (R1, R2, and R3) as major mutational hotspots in VSDs. The same amino-acid substitutions at equivalent gating-charge positions in VSD _I and VSD _II of the cardiac sodium channel Na _v 1.5 show differential gating-property impacts in electrophysiology measurements. We conducted 120 µs molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on wild-type and six mutants to elucidate the structural basis of their differential impacts. Our μs-scale MD simulations with applied external electric fields captured VSD state transitions and revealed the differential structural dynamics between equivalent R-to-Q mutants. Notably, we observed transient leaky conformations in some mutants during structural transitions, offering a detailed structural explanation for gating-pore currents. Our salt-bridge network analysis uncovered VSD-specific and state-dependent interactions among gating charges, countercharges, and lipids. This detailed analysis elucidated how mutations disrupt critical electrostatic interactions, thereby altering VSD permeability and modulating gating properties. By demonstrating the crucial importance of considering the specific structural context of each mutation, our study represents a significant leap forward in understanding structure- function relationships in Na _v channels. Our work establishes a robust framework for future investigations into the molecular basis of ion channel-related disorders.

Proteins critical for synaptic transmission are non-uniformly distributed and assembled into regions of high density called subsynaptic densities (SSDs) that transsynaptically align in nanocolumns. Neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 are essential presynaptic adhesion molecules that non-redundantly control NMDAR- and AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission, respectively, via transsynaptic interactions with distinct postsynaptic ligands. Despite their functional relevance, fundamental questions regarding the nanoscale properties of individual neurexins, their influence on the subsynaptic organization of excitatory synapses and the mechanisms controlling how individual neurexins engage in precise transsynaptic interactions are unknown. Using Double Helix 3D dSTORM and neurexin mouse models, we identify neurexin-3 as a critical presynaptic adhesion molecule that regulates excitatory synapse nano-organization in hippocampus. Furthermore, endogenous neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 form discrete and non-overlapping SSDs that are enriched opposite their postsynaptic ligands. Thus, the nanoscale organization of neurexin-1 and neurexin-3 may explain how individual neurexins signal in parallel to govern different synaptic properties.